| Date |
Text |
| 2023-03-27 11:41:16 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER |
| | 561-822-1462 |
| | PROJECT: 515 FERN ST Z22090013 |
| | MARCH 27, 2023 |
| | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND |
| | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE |
| | TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON |
| | SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS |
| | SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, |
| | MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE THE ARBORISTS |
| | REPORT RATING THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL |
| | FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS. |
| | 11/29/22: SABAL PALMS QUALIFYING AS GOOD CONDITION ARE |
| | TO BE SHOWN AS RELOCATE. #6, 11, 12, 22, AND 23. |
| | CORRECT #65 AND 66 TO JACARANDA. |
| | PER A SITE VISIT ON 11/29, IT APPEARS TREES HAVE BEEN |
| | REMOVED FROM THE SITE WITHOUT A PERMIT BEING ISSUED. |
| | |
| | 2. SATISFIED. FOR THE REQUIRED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, |
| | PTYCHOSPERMA ELEGANS CANNOT BE COUNTED AS A LARGE PALM |
| | TOWARD TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENT. |
| | |
| | 3. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET TREES AT |
| | MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR |
| | EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED |
| | PER SECTION 94-113. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS: |
| | ??? SATISFIED. THE NEW ROAD REQUIRES STREET TREE |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR BOTH SIDES. |
| | ??? SATISFIED. PALMS CAN BE ADDED TO THE STREETSCAPE |
| | BUT ARE NOT COUNTED TOWARD THE SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT. |
| | MAXIMUM SPACING IS 30 FEET. FERN ST DOES NOT MEET THE |
| | SPACING REQUIREMENTS AND THE WEST SIDE OF THE NEW ROAD |
| | MUST PROVIDE 10 TREES. |
| | 11/29/22: 30 FOOT MAXIMUM SPACING OF SHADE TREES IS |
| | POSSIBLE ON FERN STREET. |
| | ??? SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST BE IN THE REQUIRED 4 |
| | FOOT WIDTH PLANTING STRIP ADJACENT TO THE CURB ON FERN |
| | ST. |
| | 11/29/22: PLANTING STRIP MUST BE PROVIDED AROUND THE |
| | STREET TREES. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4. SATISFIED. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM HEIGHT |
| | OF 20 FEET. PROVIDE SPECIES LIVE OAKS OR CATHEDRAL |
| | CULTIVAR INSTEAD OF HIGH RISE CULTIVAR. |
| | |
| | 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND DETAIL FOR THE |
| | REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE PER SECTION |
| | 94-113 AND PROVIDE THE TYPICAL DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION. |
| | THE DETAIL PROVIDED ON SHEET LP-6 DOES NOT MATCH CITY |
| | DETAIL. THE AREA MUST BE 9 X14 FT PARALLEL TO THE CURB |
| | FOR EACH TREE CONSISTING OF PLANTING AREA AND/OR |
| | STRUCTURAL SOIL. ROOT BARRIERS WILL CUT OFF THE |
| | STRUCTURAL SOIL, SO UTILITIES MUST BE COORDINATED I.E. |
| | GAS LINE ALONG FERN. |
| | |
| | 6. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ON THE PLANT LIST: |
| | ??? SATISFIED. JAPANESE BLUEBERRY TOPIARY AND GREEN |
| | ISLAND FICUS TOPIARY MUST BE MOVED FROM THE TREE LIST |
| | TO THE SHRUB LIST. |
| | ??? SATISFIED. COCONUT IS NOT A FLORIDA NATIVE PLANT. |
| | ??? SATISFIED. CLUSIA GUTTIFERA CAN BE COUNTED AS A |
| | FLORIDA NATIVE PLANT. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 7. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND |
| | SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES CLEARLY ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. |
| | SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF |
| | UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND |
| | PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING. DRAINAGE LINES APPEAR |
| | TO BE IN CONFLICT WITH TREES IN THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE |
| | PLAZA. |
| | |
| | |
| | 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND |
| | MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL |
| | EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED. |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/29/22: |
| | 9. SATISFIED. CLARIFY THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREA ALONG |
| | THE WEST PROPERTY LINE AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED |
| | LANDSCAPING. PALMS MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR REQUIRED |
| | TREES. LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN FOR |
| | THE ACCESS LAYOUT. |
| | |
| | 10. SATISFIED. THE PLAN APPEARS TO SHOW THE 5 FOOT |
| | LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON THE 360 ROSEMARY PROPERTY BEING |
| | REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A SIDEWALK. THIS WOULD |
| | REQUIRE AMENDING THE APPROVED LANDSCAPING FOR 360 |
| | ROSEMARY. |
| | |
| | |
| | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL |
| | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON |
| | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. |
| | |
| | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE |
| | RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH |
| | THIS PETITION. |
| | |
| | |
| | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREETSCAPE |
| | LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A |
| | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. |
| | |
| |
Print |
