| Date |
Text |
| 2022-10-13 03:19:24 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS |
| | 1) PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED TRAFFIC STUDY |
| | 2) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER |
| | 3) PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) |
| | MEASURES |
| | SITE COMMENTS |
| | 4) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR |
| | SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND WHEEL |
| | PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT COLORS. |
| | PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS IN A SEPARATE SHEET. SUCH PLAN(S) |
| | CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION |
| | REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T1.2, |
| | T-3.0). CURRENT ANALYSIS IS INSUFFICIENT. |
| | 5) PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF |
| | REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA |
| | AND BICYCLE ONES |
| | 6) ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, CLEARLY |
| | SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE |
| | BACK OF THE SIDEWALK |
| | 7) IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO, PROVIDE A DETAILED |
| | OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. ALSO, ANY VALET OPERATIONS SHOULD |
| | BE KEPT INTERNAL TO THE PROPERTY, NO PICK-UP/DROP-OFF |
| | ON PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY |
| | 8) DOES THE QUADRILLE PLAZA DR EXTENSION COMPLY WITH |
| | FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENTS IN TERM OF |
| | DISTANCE FROM RAILROAD TRACKS AND GATE ARMS? |
| | 9) PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF METERED STALLS THAT ARE BEING |
| | REMOVED OR RELOCATED |
| | 10) THERE IS A LACK OF ON-STREET PARKING AND |
| | PICK-UP/DROP OFF ZONES IN THE AREA; MOREOVER, THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS REMOVING SEVERAL STALLS ON FERN |
| | AND EVERNIA. THUS, PROVIDE ON-STREET METERED PARKING |
| | ALONG THE PROPOSED NEW ROADWAY |
| | 11) EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE PARKING AREA ALONG FERN |
| | 12) EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE STRETCH OF ROAD NORTH OF THE |
| | SOUTH-WESTERN SERVICE DRIVEWAY |
| | 13) PROVIDE A CIRCULATION DIAGRAM FOR LEVEL 2 |
| | 14) THE SINGLE ELECTRIC CAR PARKING ON LEVEL 2 NEARBY |
| | THE ACCESS GATES IS NOT FEASIBLE, EITHER REMOVE IT OR |
| | PROVIDE A TURN-AROUND SPACE |
| | 15) SHOWCASE AND INSERT THE VALUE FOR EACH SLOPE ON |
| | LEVEL 1. SHEET A1.01 |
| | 16) IS THERE A SLOPE BY THE GARAGE ENTRY GATES ON LEVEL |
| | 2? SHEET A1.02 |
| | 17) INSTALL AND SHOW DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT |
| | MARKINGS THROUGHOUT THE GARAGE FLOORS |
| | 18) PER CITY CODE SEC 94-111(C)(1): IN THOSE CASES |
| | WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO A WALL, |
| | FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION, THE |
| | STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE |
| | FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF |
| | THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A |
| | MINIMUM OF TWO FEET. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR EVERY STALL |
| | NEARBY A WALL OR OBSTRUCTION IN SHEET A1.02 TO A1.06. |
| | 19) PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 8-FEET WIDE PEDESTRIAN |
| | WALKABLE AREA THROUGHOUT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. |
| | PROVIDE 15-FEET WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG EVERNIA, SO TO STAY |
| | CONSISTENT WITH THE WESTERN PORTION FRONTING THE 360 |
| | BUILDING. THIS IS CLEARLY SHOWN IN SHEET R0.02. |
| | 20) THE EXISTING BICYCLE LANE CONFIGURATION SHOULD BE |
| | UNCHANGED. THE 2-FEET BUFFER BETWEEN THE EDGE OF THE |
| | BIKE LANE AND THE EXISTING STALLS/PROPOSED NEW CURB |
| | MUST BE KEPT. SHOWCASE SUCH DIMENSION IN THE |
| | TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN |
| | 21) INSTALL SHARROW MARKINGS ALONG THE NEW ROADWAY |
| | 22) IF FEASIBLE, PROVIDE A PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ON FERN, |
| | JUST EAST OF THE QUADRILLE PLAZA DR EXTENSION |
| | 23) PROVIDE A MID-BLOCK CROSSING ON FERN, JUST EAST OF |
| | THE SERVICE DRIVEWAY |
| | 24) PROVIDE A MID-BLOCK CROSSING ON THE QUADRILLE PLAZA |
| | DR EXTENSION |
| | 25) PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIRECTIONALITY FOR EACH OF THE |
| | SERVICE DRIVEWAYS. ARE THEY ONE-WAY OR TWO-WAY? |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
