| Date |
Text |
| 2023-06-23 10:42:22 | CASE NO. PB 950JJJJJJ |
| | ROSEMARY SQUARE D BLOCK GARAGE MODIFICATIONS |
| | 655 HIBISCUS STREET |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446, |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO |
| | (2) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THESE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY AUGUST 23, 2023), |
| | THE PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE |
| | CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL |
| | REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 1) THERE ARE THREE NEW ADA PARKING SPACES SHOWN ON THE |
| | GROUND LEVEL OF THE GARAGE. THESE THREE SPACES NEED TO |
| | SHOW THAT THERE IS AN UNOBSTRUCTED ACCESSIBLE PATH TO |
| | AN ADA COMPLIANT SIDEWALK THAT DOES NOT FORCE A USER |
| | BEHIND A PARKING SPACE THAT IS NOT THE ONE THEY PARKED |
| | IN. IF THE INTENT IS FOR THE ADA PARKING SPACES TO |
| | CHANNEL THE USER TO THE EXISTING SIDEWALK ON THE |
| | EXTERIOR OF THE GARAGE, THEN YOU MUST PROVIDE THE |
| | SIDEWALK DIMENSION TO VERIFY THAT THE SIDEWALK IS WIDE |
| | ENOUGH TO COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM ADA WIDTH. IF THE ADA |
| | ROUTE OUT OF THE GARAGE FOR THE ADA SPACE ALONG THE |
| | SOUTHERN WALL IS TO EXIT ALONG THE SCOOTER PARKING, |
| | THEN THE PROPER WIDTH ALONG THE FENCE MUST BE PROVIDED |
| | AS WELL AS SHOWING THAT THE CURBS AND SIDEWALK ACROSS |
| | THE GARAGE ENTRANCE MUST BE ADA COMPLIANT (CURRENTLY |
| | THEY ARE NOT). ADDITIONALLY, THE PLANS MUST CLEARLY |
| | SHOW THAT THE BOLLARDS THAT CURRENTLY SEPARATE THE |
| | PARKING SPACES FROM THE SIDEWALK ARE REPOSITIONED SO |
| | THAT THEY PERMIT THE FULL UNOBSTRUCTED WIDTH OF THE ADA |
| | ACCESS AISLES TO THE SIDEWALK IF THIS IS THE ROUTE TO |
| | THE SIDEWALK. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PARKING SPACE |
| | ADJACENT TO THE STAIRWELL WALL IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE |
| | ONE (1) ADDITIONAL FOOT OF WIDTH TO ACCOMMODATE THE |
| | OPENING OF DOORS. THIS DIMENSION SHALL BE CLEARLY SHOWN |
| | ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 2) PROVIDE DIMENSIONED PLANS FOR THE AREAS THAT ARE |
| | BEING CHANGED SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY: |
| | |
| | A. THERE IS SUFFICIENT SPACE FOR THE NEW EV, ADA AND |
| | REGULAR SPACES ALONG THE EAST WALL OF THE GROUND LEVEL. |
| | B. THERE IS A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET FOR CAR QUEUING |
| | BETWEEN THE NEW GATE AND THE WALKWAY AT THE ENTRANCE TO |
| | THE GARAGE. |
| | C. THE NEW ADA SPACES AND THEIR ACCESS AISLES COMPLY |
| | WITH MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. |
| | **** NO DIMENSIONS WERE PROVIDED ON THE PLANS FOR ANY |
| | OF THE NEWLY STRIPED AREAS ON ANY FLOOR. **** |
| | |
| | 3) STAFF COUNTED THE PARKING SPACES AS SHOWN ON THE |
| | GARAGE FLOOR PLANS, AND THE INCONSISTENCIES LISTED |
| | BELOW EXIST. NOTE: PARKING SPACE COUNTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED ON EVERY LEVEL, EITHER WITH COUNTS FOR THE ROW |
| | OR MARKING EACH SPACE INDIVIDUALLY. |
| | |
| | A. THE GROUND LEVEL PARKING COUNT TABLE CORRECTLY LISTS |
| | 105 TOTAL PARKING SPACES BUT NEEDS TO LIST THE CAR |
| | SHARE SPACE AS ITS OWN LINE ITEM, NOT AS PART OF THE |
| | STANDARD STALL COUNT. |
| | B. THE LEVEL 2 PARKING COUNT TABLE INCORRECTLY LISTS 19 |
| | MORE TOTAL PARKING SPACES THEN ARE SHOWN. |
| | C. ON LEVEL 2, THERE IS A NOTATION THAT POINTS TO A |
| | REGULAR PARKING SPACE THAT STATES "NEW HANDICAP |
| | PARKING" THIS IS NOT SHOWN AS AN ADA SPACE, NOR IS IT |
| | COUNTED ON THE PARKING TABLE. |
| | D. THE LEVEL 2 PARKING COUNT TABLE MUST HAVE A SEPARATE |
| | LINE ITEM FOR THE GATED RESIDENT PARKING SPACES FROM |
| | THE STANDARD PARKING SPACE. THIS WILL ALLOW STAFF TO |
| | EASILY IDENTIFY THESE PARKING SPACES FOR THE PARKING |
| | COUNTS. |
| | E. IF THERE ARE TO BE ADDITIONAL GATED RESIDENT SPACES |
| | AS SHOWN ON PERMIT 22060603, THESE NEED TO BE CLEARLY |
| | SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND REFLECTED IN THE TABLE. |
| | F. THE COMBINED PARKING COUNT TABLE LISTS 700 SPACE, |
| | BUT STAFF COUNTS 701 PARKING SPACES. THIS TABLE NEEDS |
| | TO HAVE LINE ITEMS FOR THE VARIOUS PARKING TYPES (EX. |
| | BELOW). NOTE: THIS TABLE NEEDS TO REFLECT THE FINAL |
| | RESIDENT COUNTS FROM COMMENT #4. |
| | LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5 |
| | STANDARD 85 88 152 151 149 |
| | ADA 6 4 4 4 4 |
| | EV (INC. 1 ADA EV) 13 0 0 0 0 |
| | CAR SHARE 1 0 0 0 0 |
| | RESIDENT ONLY 0 40 0 0 0 |
| | TOTAL 105 132 156 155 153 |
| | |
| | 4) THE PARKING COUNT CHART PROVIDED BY JORDAN RATHLEV |
| | NEEDS TO EXCLUDE ALL THE SPACES THAT ARE RESERVED FOR A |
| | PARTICULAR USER GROUP AS THESE MAY NOT BE COUNTED |
| | TOWARD MEETING THE OVERALL RS DEVELOPMENT PARKING. THE |
| | EXCLUDED SPACES INCLUDE THE RESIDENT SPACES, THE CAR |
| | SHARE SPACE, AND THE NON-ADA EV SPACES. |
| | |
| | STAFF REQUIRES CLARIFICATION ON THE NUMBER OF RESIDENT |
| | SPACES THAT ARE LOCATED WITHIN D GARAGE. THE PLANS |
| | SUBMITTED WITH THE MINOR PD AMENDMENT SHOW 40 RESIDENT |
| | SPACES ON LEVEL 2. THE RATHLEV TABLE LISTS 55 SAPODILLA |
| | RESIDENT SPACES WITHIN THE GARAGE. THE PLANS SUBMITTED |
| | WITH PERMIT 22060603 SHOW AN "EXISTING" GATE ON LEVEL 4 |
| | (WHICH DOES NOT APPEAR ON THE MINOR PD AMENDMENT PLAN, |
| | AND FOR WHICH PLANNING STAFF COULD NOT FIND A PERMIT) |
| | THAT IS PROPOSED TO BE MOVED TO LEVEL 3. THE "EXISTING" |
| | GATE SEPARATES 150+ PARKING SPACES FROM GENERAL |
| | AVAILABILITY, WHILE THE "PROPOSED"? GATE SEPARATES 400+ |
| | SPACES FROM GENERAL AVAILABILITY. WHILE THESE ARE |
| | PRESUMABLY PARKING SPACES FOR 575 RESIDENTS, THIS NEEDS |
| | BETTER ACCOUNTING ON THE PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE |
| | INSTALLATION OF THE GATE ARM RESULTS IN PARKING SPACES |
| | THAT ARE NO LONGER ACCESSIBLE AND THUS THE NUMBER OF |
| | AVAILABLE SPACES MUST BE SHOWN DECREASING ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 5) ALL RESIDENT ONLY SPACES MUST BE CLEARLY DESIGNATED |
| | ON THE PLAN. THIS MAY BE BY MARKING THE SPACES |
| | INDIVIDUALLY OR WITHIN A BOX, SIMILAR TO HOW THEY ARE |
| | GATED. |
| | |
| | 6) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE 20-FOOT DIMENSION FROM |
| | THE ENTRY GATE; HOWEVER, THIS VERIFIES THAT THE |
| | SIDEWALK WILL BE BLOCKED, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. THE |
| | 20-FOOT DEPTH MY NOT ENCROACH THE SIDEWALK. |
| | |
| | 7) PLEASE CLARIFY THE USERS OF THE NEW ACCESS POINT. |
| | THE NOTES STATE THAT THERE WILL BE TICKET AND CARD |
| | READERS AND A PAY STATION; HOWEVER, IT ONLY SHOWS A |
| | CARD READER. THESE FEATURES NEED TO BE SHOWN AS PART OF |
| | THE CHANGES AS PART OF THIS MINOR PD AMENDMENT. THIS |
| | WAS BRIEFLY DISCUSSED AT THE COORDINATION MEETING ON |
| | JUNE 22, 2023. |
| | |
| | 8) PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE MATERIAL THAT WILL BE |
| | INSTALLED IN THE LANDSCAPE AREA. A HEDGE WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED ALONG THE GARAGE WHERE THE DRIVEWAY IS BEING |
| | REMOVED. IRRIGATION WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED THE NEW |
| | LANDSCAPED AREA. **** NO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS WERE |
| | SUBMITTED WITH THE MINOR PD AMENDMENT. **** |
| | |
| | 9) PROVIDE A SURVEY THAT INCLUDES THE WIDTH OF THE |
| | SIDEWALK OUTSIDE OF THE GARAGE'S EASTERN WALL. |
| | |
| | 10) THE PARKING LAYOUT APPROVED AS PART OF THE MINOR PD |
| | AMENDMENT SHALL BE REFLECTED ON PERMIT 22060603 FOR THE |
| | GARAGE IMPROVEMENTS. THERE ARE CURRENTLY NUMEROUS |
| | DISCREPANCIES, SOME ARE LISTED ON THE PERMIT COMMENTS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
