| Date |
Text |
| 2022-10-04 09:49:26 | CASE NO. PB 950JJJJJJ |
| | ROSEMARY SQUARE D BLOCK GARAGE MODIFICATIONS |
| | 655 HIBISCUS STREET |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446, |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO |
| | (2) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THESE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY DECEMBER 4, 2022), |
| | THE PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE |
| | CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL |
| | REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($60). |
| | |
| | 1) PROVIDE DIMENSIONED PLANS FOR THE AREAS THAT ARE |
| | BEING CHANGED SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY: |
| | |
| | A. THERE IS SUFFICIENT SPACE FOR THE NUMBER OF NEW EV |
| | AND REGULAR SPACES ALONG THE WEST WALL OF LEVEL 1. |
| | B. THERE IS A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET FOR CAR QUEUING |
| | BETWEEN THE NEW GATE AND THE WALKWAY AT THE ENTRANCE TO |
| | THE GARAGE. |
| | C. THE NEW ADA SPACES AND THEIR ACCESS AISLES COMPLY |
| | WITH MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2) STAFF COUNTED THE PARKING SPACES ON THE PLAN, AND |
| | THEY DO NOT MATCH THE NUMBERS ON THE TABLES. |
| | |
| | A. THERE ARE MORE PARKING SPACES ON LEVEL 1 THAN LISTED |
| | ON THE TABLE. |
| | B. LEVEL 2 NEEDS TO SHOW THE ACCESS CONTROL AS IT |
| | EXISTS TO SAPODILLA AVENUE. THE PARKING COUNT THEN |
| | NEEDS TO REFLECT THE ACCURATE CONDITIONS. |
| | C. THERE ARE LESS SPACES ON LEVEL 5 THAN LISTED ON THE |
| | TABLE. |
| | |
| | 3) THE PARKING COUNT CHART DOES NOT MATCH THE LATEST |
| | CHART PROVIDED BY JORDAN RATHLEV. ALL THE |
| | PLANS/PROVIDED INFORMATION NEEDS TO SHOW ACCURATE, |
| | CONSISTENT INFORMATION, ESPECIALLY DUE TO THE UPCOMING |
| | INCREASE IN SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT IS PROPOSED IN THE NEAR |
| | FUTURE. PLEASE INCLUDE AN UPDATED RATHLEV CHART. |
| | |
| | 4) THE NON-ADA EV SPACES MUST BE SHOWN AS A SEPARATE |
| | LINE ITEM FROM THE STANDARD STALLS. THESE SPACES MAY |
| | NOT BE A SUBSET OF THE GENERAL PARKING, BUT RATHER ARE |
| | THEIR OWN CATEGORY. |
| | |
| | 5) THE RESIDENT ONLY SPACES MUST BE DESIGNATED ON THE |
| | PLAN. THIS MAY BE BY MARKING THE SPACES INDIVIDUALLY OR |
| | WITHIN A BOX, SIMILAR TO HOW THEY ARE GATED. |
| | |
| | 6) ANY VALET SPACES MUST BE INDICATED ON THE PLANS AND |
| | PROVIDED AS A LINE ITEM ON THE TABLE. |
| | |
| | 7) THE PLANS SEEM TO INDICATE THAT THE EV CHARGING UNIT |
| | WILL NOT BE LOCATED AT THE HEAD OF THE PARKING SPACES, |
| | BUT RATHER THE MIDDLE OF THE SPACES. THE EV CHARGING |
| | UNIT CANNOT BE LOCATED SO AS TO IMPEDE DOOR OPENING. |
| | |
| | 8) THERE ARE TWO SETS OF EV SPACES SHOWN ON THE PLANS. |
| | ONE SET APPEARS TO BE THE 10 EV PARKING SPACES REQUIRED |
| | BY THE ROSEMARY SQUARE CENTER SUBDISTRICT REQUIREMENTS |
| | AND ONE SET APPEAR TO BE THE PROPOSED FPL EV CHARGERS. |
| | IS THIS CORRECT? |
| | |
| | 9) THE PERMIT FOR THE FPL EV CHARGING STATIONS INCLUDES |
| | TRANSFORMERS AND OTHER EQUIPMENT BOTH INSIDE AND |
| | OUTSIDE OF THE GARAGE. IF THIS PERMIT IS COVERING THE |
| | FPL EV INFRASTRUCTURE, THEN THESE NEED TO BE SHOWN ON |
| | THIS MINOR AMENDMENT, OTHERWISE FPL WILL NEED TO SUBMIT |
| | A MINOR AMENDMENT SHOWING THESE ITEMS. STAFF |
| | RECOMMENDATION IS TO INCLUDE THEM WITH THIS |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 10) THE CITY HAS ON FILE AN APPROVED PERMIT FOR THREE |
| | TESLA CHARGING STATIONS IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF |
| | LEVEL 1 OF THE GARAGE. DO THESE STILL EXIST? IF SO, |
| | THEY NEED TO BE CLEARLY DESIGNATED ON THE PLANS AS WELL |
| | AS ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PARKING TABLE. |
| | |
| | 11) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE CENTER SUBDISTRICT REQUIRED |
| | REQUIRES ONE CAR SHARE SPACE IN THIS GARAGE. PLEASE |
| | INDICATE WHERE IT IS TO BE LOCATED AND REFLECT THIS |
| | ACCORDINGLY ON THE PARKING TABLE. |
| | |
| | 12) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE CENTER SUBDISTRICT PROHIBITS EV |
| | CHARGING STATIONS ON THE ROOF (LEVEL 5) OF THE GARAGE. |
| | THE TWO EV SPACES SHOWN ON LEVEL 5 OF THE GARAGE NEED |
| | TO BE MOVED TO A LOWER LEVEL. |
| | |
| | 13) PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE MATERIAL THAT WILL BE |
| | INSTALLED IN THE LANDSCAPE AREA. A HEDGE WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED ALONG THE GARAGE WHERE THE DRIVEWAY IS BEING |
| | REMOVED. IRRIGATION WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED THE NEW |
| | LANDSCAPED AREA. |
| | |
| | 14) STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE EV |
| | CHARGERS OR THE CLOSING OF THE ENTRY DRIVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
