| Date |
Text |
| 2022-09-07 11:05:36 | 9/7/22 ? FAILED |
| | |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING: |
| | A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED |
| | MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG |
| | WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN). |
| | C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF |
| | 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED |
| | AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED: |
| | F. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE |
| | STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. |
| | G. PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION LETTERS FROM |
| | PUBLIC UTILITIES (CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC |
| | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, AT&T TELECOMMUNICATION, FLORIDA |
| | PUBLIC UTILITIES, FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, AND |
| | COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS) CONFIRMING THAT THE |
| | PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS |
| | OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR |
| | SERVICES. |
| | H. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD OF COMPLIANCE RESPONSE |
| | TO THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS |
| | (ZLDR) SUBSECTION 94-273(D)(54). |
| | I. PLEASE PROVIDE PICTURES FROM ALL ANGLES OF THE |
| | SUBJECT PROPERTY. |
| | J. PLEASE PROVIDE LETTERS OF SUPPORT AND OBJECTION FROM |
| | THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS. |
| | K. PLEASE SUBMIT AN INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | L. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT |
| | INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED |
| | MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL. |
| | M. PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETED PUBLIC NOTICE MAILER |
| | AFFIDAVIT WHEN MAILERS HAVE BEEN SENT OUT. |
| | |
| | REVIEW COMMENT MUST BE ADDRESSED: |
| | 1. THE BUILDING ENVELOPE/FOOTPRINT OF THE ?EXISTING ONE |
| | STORY STRUCTURE? PROPOSED TO BE CONVERTED TO AN |
| | ?EXERCISE STUDIO AND HEALTH CLUB? IS GREATER IN SIZE ON |
| | THE SURVEY AND PLANS THAN THE ?3,465 SQUARE FEET? |
| | INDICATED IN THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL. THEREFORE, |
| | PLEASE CORRECT THE PLANS, JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, AND |
| | OTHER SUBMITTED MATERIALS |
| | IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING THIS INFORMATION, |
| | ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 2. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SECTION 94-486, THE |
| | MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | PROPOSED USE IS AS REQUIRED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING |
| | ADMINISTRATOR. THEREFORE, OBTAIN CONFIRMATION FROM THE |
| | PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE REQUIRED |
| | NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES AND PLEASE REVISE THE |
| | DIFFERENT PLANS, JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, AND OTHER |
| | SUBMITTED MATERIALS |
| | IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING THIS INFORMATION, |
| | ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 3. PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, BY |
| | IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING THE PROPOSED |
| | PARKING SPACES ENTIRELY ON THE SUBJECT PARCEL NUMBER |
| | 74434316150010070. |
| | 4. THE PROPOSED PARKING SPACES ARE NOT IN COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE MINIMUM OFF-STREET PARKING DIMENSIONAL |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(N), |
| | THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, |
| | ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 5. PLEASE FURTHER EXPLAIN/CLARIFY THE PROPOSED VALET |
| | PARKING OPERATIONS. |
| | 6. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(Q), |
| | PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE REQUIRED |
| | BICYCLE PARKING ON THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 7. THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS |
| | FRONT SETBACK REQUIREMENT ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR |
| | SUBSECTION 94-304(B)(2), THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE |
| | PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 8. PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, AND RELOCATE |
| | THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE FURTHER SOUTH CLOSER TO |
| | THE HOGANS STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| | 9. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE HOGANS STREET ON THE SURVEY |
| | AND PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 10. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE REMOVAL OF |
| | THE EXISTING CURB CUTS/DRIVE ACCESSES ALONG 20TH STREET |
| | ON THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS OF |
| | VEHICLE/BICYCLE PARKING (STANDARD, COMPACT, ADA), |
| | LOADING, ADA RAMPS, DRIVEWAYS, DUMPSTERS AND SIGNS. |
| | 12. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SECTION 94-611, THE |
| | SUBJECT PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010070 IS A DOUBLE |
| | FRONTAGE LOT. |
| | 13. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION |
| | 94-273(D)(54)(B)(7), A LANDSCAPE BUFFER AT LEAST FIVE |
| | FEET WIDE SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG ALL PROPERTY LINES, |
| | THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 14. THE PROPOSED WALL (DEMONSTRATED ON THE SUBJECT |
| | PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010070) EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM |
| | HEIGHT OF FIVE (5) FEET AND IS CLOSER THAN THE MINIMUM |
| | SIX (6) INCHES DISTANCE REQUIREMENT ALONG THE SIDE LOT |
| | LINE ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION |
| | 94-273(D)(54)(B)(14), THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE |
| | PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 15. THE PROPOSED WALL (DEMONSTRATED ON THE SUBJECT |
| | PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010070) WITHIN THE REQUIRED |
| | FRONT SETBACKS EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 48 INCHES |
| | ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-302(B)(1), |
| | THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 16. THE PROPOSED WALL (DEMONSTRATED ON THE SUBJECT |
| | PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010070) WITHIN 20 FEET OF THE |
| | RESIDENTIAL FRONT PROPERTY LINES EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM |
| | HEIGHT OF 30 INCHES ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION |
| | 94-443(A)(1), THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, |
| | ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 17. THE PROPOSED WALL (DEMONSTRATED ON THE ADJACENT |
| | PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010010) WITHIN THE REQUIRED |
| | FRONT SETBACK EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 48 INCHES |
| | ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-302(C)(1), |
| | THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 18. THE PROPOSED WALL (DEMONSTRATED ON THE ADJACENT |
| | PARCEL NUMBER 74434316150010010) IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE AT INTERSECTIONS |
| | REQUIREMENT ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-305(E), |
| | THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 19. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION, |
| | HEIGHT AND INTENSITY OF ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON THE |
| | PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 20. PLEASE PROVIDE THE HOURS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE |
| | PROPOSED ?EXERCISE STUDIO AND HEALTH CLUB? USE. |
| | 21. PLEASE PROVIDE THE OWNERSHIP PROVISIONS FOR THE |
| | PROPOSED OFF-SITE PARKING SPACES ACCORDING THE ZLDR |
| | SUBSECTION 94-273(D)(54)(B)(15). |
| | |
| | |
| | KEVIE DEFRANC |
| | PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-822-1449 |
| | |
| |
Print |
