| Date |
Text |
| 2022-09-07 23:34:51 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS |
| | 1) PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED TRAFFIC STUDY |
| | 2) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER |
| | 3) DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS, |
| | TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES MAY BE |
| | REQUIRED |
| | |
| | SITE COMMENTS |
| | 4) PROVIDE A CLEAN TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN |
| | FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION RELATED |
| | FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, PARKING |
| | STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, GATES, |
| | CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER & DRIVEWAY |
| | SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED |
| | AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD BE NAMED T-1.0 |
| | 5) IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB |
| | DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, |
| | PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS |
| | SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | 6) PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN. |
| | INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. THE |
| | SITE PLAN IS PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND |
| | SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T-1.1 OR T-2.0) |
| | 7) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR |
| | SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND WHEEL |
| | PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT COLORS. |
| | SITE PLAN(S) CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART OF THE |
| | TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY |
| | (E.G. T1.2, T-3.0) |
| | 8) PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND SPECS SHEETS FOR |
| | EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G. |
| | CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAL, |
| | ETC.) |
| | 9) IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN PLAN, PROVIDE A |
| | TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED |
| | ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF METERED |
| | STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED, IF ANY |
| | 10) ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, CLEARLY |
| | SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE |
| | BACK OF THE SIDEWALK |
| | 11) FOR SAFETY AND OPERATIONAL PURPOSES, NO NEW |
| | ON-STREET PARKING STALLS ADJACENT TO THE BIKE LANE AND |
| | IN THE PROXIMITY OF AN INTERSECTION SHALL BE ALLOWED. |
| | PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLANS ACCORDINGLY |
| | 12) PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETE PARKING TABLE, SHOWCASING |
| | THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING STALLS, |
| | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. PROVIDE CITY CODE |
| | REFERENCE FOR THE CALCULATION |
| | 13) THE PROPOSED FULL-ACCESS DRIVEWAY ON 15TH ST SHOULD |
| | BE EXIT-ONLY, WHILE CONVERTING THE PROPOSED WESTERN |
| | EXIT-ONLY DRIVEWAY TO A FULL-ACCESS ONE. MOREOVER, THE |
| | EASTERN DRIVEWAY NEEDS TO BE 125 FEET AWAY FROM THE |
| | INTERSECTION, PER FDOT CORNER CLEARANCE REQUIREMENT. |
| | PLEASE SHOWCASE SUCH DISTANCE IN THE TRANSPORTATION |
| | PLAN |
| | 14) THE ALLEY MUST BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY ONLY. |
| | CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING INSTALLED |
| | AND SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH PUBLIC |
| | WORKS PERTAINING THE DIRECTIONALITY AND NOTIFY TRAFFIC |
| | ENGINEERING ABOUT THE FINAL DECISION |
| | 15) PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS ON 14TH ST MAY |
| | NOT MEET CORNER CLEARANCE REQUIREMENT (125 FEET). |
| | PLEASE SHOWCASE SUCH DISTANCE IN THE TRANSPORTATION |
| | PLAN |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
