| Date |
Text |
| 2023-06-09 15:14:32 | 6/9/23 ??? FAILED |
| | |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | 1. PER CITY CODE, PARKING WAIVERS FOR PDS CAN ONLY BE |
| | GRANTED IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE |
| | 95, OR EAST OF AUSTRALIAN AVENUE BETWEEN OKEECHOBEE |
| | BOULEVARD AND BELVEDERE ROAD. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES |
| | NOT FALL WITHIN THIS AREA, THEREFORE ALL PARKING AND |
| | LOADING SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XV |
| | OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. [NOT |
| | SATISFIED - HOWEVER, SUBMITTED TEXT CHANGE (ZLDRS) |
| | APPLICATION ACKNOWLEDGED] |
| | 2. PER ARTICLE XV, NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES WAS |
| | CALCULATED INCORRECTLY 33 TOTAL PARKING SPACES ARE |
| | NEEDED (3 FOR THE OFFICE SPACE, 5 FOR THE FIRST 10,000 |
| | SQ FEET OF WAREHOUSE SPACE, 24.32 (ROUNDED UP TO 25) |
| | FOR THE REMAINING 98,292 SQ FEET OF WAREHOUSE SPACE.) |
| | [RESPONSE PROVIDED] |
| | 3. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS OPPOSITE ONE-WAY ROADS TO THE |
| | NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE BUILDING, AND TWO WAY ROADS TO |
| | THE EAST AND WEST. THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE FROM A |
| | TRAFFIC FLOW PERSPECTIVE. [SATISFIED] |
| | 4. PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | THE FOLLOWING STANDARD (ANY SOURCE OF ILLUMINATION |
| | LOCATED WITHIN A COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL PLANNED |
| | DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE FOOTCANDLE AT |
| | OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH DEVELOPMENT.) |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | 5. NOTE THAT THE FOLLOWING CPD STANDARD (OUTDOOR |
| | STORAGE FACILITIES ARE PROHIBITED IN ANY COMMERCIAL |
| | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, UNLESS OUTDOOR STORAGE IS |
| | EXPRESSLY APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION AS PART OF |
| | THE ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE COMMERCIAL PLANNED |
| | DEVELOPMENT. APPROVAL OF OUTDOOR STORAGE IN A |
| | COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT SHALL INCLUDE |
| | MITIGATION MEASURES TO PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTIES FROM |
| | THE IMPACTS OF THE OUTDOOR STORAGE). THEREFORE, IF YOU |
| | WISH TO PROCEED WITH THE OUTDOOR VEHICLE STORAGE, YOU |
| | WILL NEED TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL SCREENING ALONG THE |
| | PROPERTY LINES. [SATISFIED] |
| | 6. THE FLARES OF YOUR ACCESS POINTS SEEM TO EXTEND PAST |
| | THE PROPERTY LINES AND IN FRONT OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES. |
| | THIS WILL NEED TO BE CORRECTED. [RESPONSE PROVIDED] |
| | 7. PLEASE SHOW THAT THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE |
| | REQUIREMENTS ARE MET AT THE ROW ACCESS POINTS PURSUANT |
| | TO SUBSECTION 94-305(E). [SATISFIED] |
| | 8. THE ARROW IDENTIFYING THE BIKE RACK DOES NOT |
| | ACTUALLY POINT TO THE BIKE RACK. FURTHERMORE, THERE IS |
| | WHAT LOOKS TO BE A BIKE RACK AND CONCRETE PAD BELOW |
| | WHERE THE ARROW POINTS TO, IS THIS THE BIKE RACK? IF |
| | SO, THE BIKE RACK APPEARS TO BE FACING THE WRONG WAY. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | 9. TWO BIKE PARKING SPACES ARE NEEDED TO REFLECT THE |
| | REQUIRED PARKING AS CITY CODE REQUIRES 1 BIKE SPACE FOR |
| | EVERY 20 PARKING SPACES OR PORTION THEREOF. [RESPONSE |
| | PROVIDED] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE |
| | (3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG/.PDF |
| | FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, |
| | 09/23/22, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE |
| | 11/15/22 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS/REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC |
| | MEETING/COMMENT ISSUANCE (BY 11/08/22), THE PLANNING |
| | DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE CASE IS |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE |
| | A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | 10. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD OF COMPLIANCE RESPONSES |
| | TO THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY???S ZONING |
| | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR) SECTION 94-207. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE LETTERS FROM PUBLIC UTILITIES (AT&T |
| | TELECOMMUNICATION, FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES, FLORIDA |
| | POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, AND COMCAST CABLE |
| | COMMUNICATIONS) CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT |
| | DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE |
| | INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES. |
| | [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] |
| | 12. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE |
| | STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [SATISFIED] |
| | 13. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION |
| | LETTERS. [SATISFIED] |
| | 14. PLEASE PROVIDE THE AGREEMENTS, PROVISIONS OR |
| | COVENANTS WHICH GOVERN THE USE, MAINTENANCE AND |
| | CONTINUED PROTECTION OF THE PD AND ANY OF ITS COMMON |
| | AREAS OR FACILITIES. [RESPONSE PROVIDED] |
| | 15. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT |
| | INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED |
| | MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | 16. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY???S ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR) SUBSECTION |
| | 94-207(B)(9)(A)(1), PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE NAME |
| | OF THE DEVELOPER ON THE SITE PLANS, SHEETS SP-1 AND |
| | SP-2. [SATISFIED] |
| | 17. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED OUTDOOR |
| | STORAGE USE IN THE SITE TABULAR DATA TABLE ON THE SITE |
| | PLANS, SHEETS SP-1 AND SP-2. [SATISFIED] |
| | 18. PLEASE SUBMIT REVISED PLANS |
| | IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING CONSISTENT |
| | INFORMATION REGARDING THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PUBLIC |
| | SIDEWALK ALONG NORTH FLORIDA MANGO ROAD. [SATISFIED] |
| | 19. IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 94-243 OF THE ZLDR, THE |
| | MINIMUM LANDSCAPING AREA REQUIRED IS 20%. THEREFORE, |
| | PLEASE REVISE THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND PLANS, |
| | ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED] |
| | 20. PLEASE CORRECT THE SITE TABULAR DATA TABLE ON THE |
| | SITE PLANS, SHEETS SP-1 AND SP-2, TO IDENTIFY/INDICATE |
| | THE NUMBER OF THE LOADING SPACES PROVIDED AS |
| | DEMONSTRATED IN THE GRAPHICS/PLANS. [SATISFIED] |
| | 21. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 9., PLEASE |
| | CORRECT THE SITE TABULAR DATA TABLE ON THE SITE PLANS, |
| | SHEETS SP-1 AND SP-2, TO IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE NUMBER |
| | OF BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRED AND PROPOSED. [RESPONSE |
| | PROVIDED] |
| | 22. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE HEIGHT AND |
| | SIZE OF THE EXISTING/PROPOSED MARQUE SIGN ON THE |
| | DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED] |
| | 23. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE |
| | EXISTING/PROPOSED MARQUE SIGN SETBACK DIMENSION FROM |
| | PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS |
| | ACCORDING TO SUBSECTION 94-408(D) OF THE ZLDR. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | 24. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION |
| | OF ALL PUBLIC ART PROPOSED ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS, |
| | ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED] |
| | 25. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE EXISTING |
| | AND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS (OR OPERATIONAL EQUIVALENTS) |
| | WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE(S) ON THE |
| | DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED] |
| | 26. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION |
| | OF ANY SPECIAL UTILITY STRUCTURES SUCH AS VALVES, |
| | METERS, BACKFLOW CONNECTIONS, PUMP STATIONS, |
| | TRANSFORMERS, AND ALL ABOVE GROUND APPURTENANCES ON THE |
| | DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED] |
| | 27. IN ORDER FOR THE SUBJECT CASE TO PROCEED THROUGH |
| | THE REVIEW PROCESS, AN APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED CITY |
| | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION TEXT AMENDMENT |
| | (CRC 22-11 / Z22120037) MUST BE OBTAINED. [RESPONSE |
| | PROVIDED] |
| | 28. IN REFERENCE TO REVIEW COMMENT 11., IT HAS BEEN |
| | IDENTIFIED THAT THE LETTER FROM COMCAST CABLE |
| | COMMUNICATIONS REFERS TO A PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL OFFICE |
| | BUILDING. THEREFORE, PLEASE PROVIDE AN UPDATED LETTER |
| | FROM COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS. |
| | |
| | |
| | KEVIE DEFRANC |
| | SENIOR PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-822-1449 |
| | |
| |
Print |
