| Date |
Text |
| 2023-01-09 13:28:10 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE |
| | 11-22-2022 SUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | 1. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] THE CITY???S OFFICIAL VERTICAL |
| | DATUM IS NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF |
| | NAVD1988 AS LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 |
| | AT THE PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE |
| | VERTICAL REFERENCE AND DATUM CONVERSION TO NGVD1929 ON |
| | EACH ENGINEERING PLAN SHEET WITH ELEVATION INFORMATION. |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENT: ADD REQUESTED INFORMATION TO SHEETS |
| | C-200, C-201, C-600, C-601, T-1.0, T-1.1, T-2.0, T-2.1, |
| | |
| | 2. S. DIXIE HWY IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT. FDOT TO APPROVE |
| | ALL PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE R/W. |
| | |
| | 3. [SATISFIED ??? SEE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS BELOW] |
| | PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM CENTERLINE OF RIGHTS OF WAY |
| | AND THE EAST PROPERTY LINES TO THE BUILDING FACES. SHOW |
| | AND LABEL SURFACE FEATURES, GRADE BREAKS, GENERAL |
| | SURFACE SLOPES, FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION, RIGHT OF WAY |
| | LINES WITH THE STREET IDENTIFIED, DIMENSIONS FROM RIGHT |
| | OF WAY TO SURFACE FEATURES. IT APPEARS FFE ARE 1 FT OR |
| | HIGHER THAN R/W GRADES. |
| | |
| | 4. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FOR ALL |
| | DRIVEWAYS FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD TO 5 FEET |
| | PAST THE HIGH POINT OF THE DRIVEWAY. SHOW AND LABEL THE |
| | RIGHT OF WAY LINE, R/W STREET NAME, SURFACE FEATURES, |
| | SURFACE SLOPES, GRADE BREAKS, ETC. |
| | |
| | 5. [SATISFIED] SUGGEST PUTTING TRENCH DRAINS AT THE |
| | BACK OF SIDEWALKS (AND OUTSIDE THE R/W) TO REDUCE |
| | TRIPPING HAZARD. |
| | |
| | 6. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE SURFACE FLOW ARROWS ON THE |
| | GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 7. [SATISFIED] LABEL EXISTING UTILITIES (SIZE, |
| | MATERIAL). |
| | |
| | 8. [NOT SATISFIED ??? HATCHING NOT FOUND ON SHEETS |
| | T-1.1 (OR T-1.0)] SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS THAT |
| | MEET CITY DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 9. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE STRIPING PLAN FOR DISTURBED |
| | PAVEMENT AREAS. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS (11/22-2022 SUBMITTAL) |
| | |
| | 10. TWO SHEETS NUMBERED T-2.0 AND TWO SHEETS NUMBERED |
| | T-2.1. |
| | |
| | 11. PROVIDE SIGN LEGEND ON SHEETS T-1.0 AND T-1.1. |
| | |
| | 12. DEMOLITION PLAN SHEET C-200 CALLS OUT THE REMOVAL |
| | OF THE EXISTING FDOT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE ON S. DIXIE HWY |
| | SOUTH OF FLAMINGO DRIVE. THE CONCEPTUAL GRADING AND |
| | DRAINAGE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THE STRUCTURE BEING |
| | REPLACED. WILL IT BE CONVERTED TO A MANHOLE TOP? HOW |
| | WILL SURFACE RUNOFF ON S. DIXIE HWY ENTER THE DRAINAGE |
| | SYSTEM? |
| | |
| | 13. DEMOLITION PLAN SHEET C-201 CALLS OUT THE REMOVAL |
| | OF THE EXISTING FDOT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE ON S. DIXIE HWY |
| | SOUTH OF BARCELONA ROAD. THE CONCEPTUAL GRADING AND |
| | DRAINAGE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THE STRUCTURE BEING |
| | REPLACED. WILL IT BE CONVERTED TO A MANHOLE TOP? HOW |
| | WILL SURFACE RUNOFF ON S. DIXIE HWY ENTER THE DRAINAGE |
| | SYSTEM? |
| | |
| | 14. PROVIDE PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS FOR |
| | THE CURB AND GUTTER AND VALLEY GUTTER ON S. DIXIE |
| | HIGHWAY. FDOT MAY REQUIRE SPREAD CALCULATIONS TO SEE |
| | HOW MUCH OF THE TRAVEL MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE |
| | RELOCATION OF THE CURB AND GUTTER AND ELIMINATION OF |
| | DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. |
| | |
| | 15. PROVIDE PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS FOR |
| | THE CURB AND GUTTER AND VALLEY GUTTER ON FLAMINGO |
| | DRIVE. |
| | |
| | 16. SOUTH CURB LINE ON FLAMINGO DRIVE IS BEING MOVED |
| | TOWARD THE CENTERLINE BY ~5 FEET. HOW WILL THE PROPOSED |
| | CURB CONNECT INTO THE EXISTING CURB LINE EAST OF THE |
| | PROJECT SITE? |
| | |
| | 17 LABEL THE STREET NAMES ON THE SECTIONS ON SHEETS |
| | C-400 AND C-401. |
| | |
| | 18. SECTION A-A??? |
| | A. INDICATE WHERE THE TRAVEL LANE CONSTRUCTION WILL |
| | MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION. |
| | B. CONFIRM NONE OF THE SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPE WILL EXCEED |
| | 2 PERCENT. |
| | |
| | 19. SECTION B-B??? |
| | A. REVIEW THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE PROPOSED TRAVEL LANE |
| | (13 FEET FROM ROAD CENTERLINE TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT |
| | ADJACENT TO THE VALLEY GUTTER) AND PROPOSED PARKING (11 |
| | FEET FROM FACE OF D???CURB TO EDGE OF TRAVEL LANE ??? |
| | INCLUDES THE VALLEY GUTTER). IN PLAN VIEW, THE PROPOSED |
| | EDGE OF PAVEMENT IS 13.5 FEET FROM THE ROAD CENTERLINE |
| | AND 10.5 FEET FROM THE FACE OF PROPOSED D-CURB. |
| | B. CONFIRM NONE OF THE SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPE WILL EXCEED |
| | 2 PERCENT. |
| | C. THE EXISTING CROWN OF ROAD APPEARS TO BE 5 FEET |
| | SOUTH OF THE ROAD CENTERLINE. |
| | |
| | 20. SECTION C-C??? |
| | A. PLAN VIEW APPEARS TO SHOW A CURB ALONG THE WEST |
| | SIDE OF THE TRAVEL LANE. |
| | |
| | 21. SECTION E-E??? |
| | A. INDICATE WHERE THE TRAVEL LANE CONSTRUCTION WILL |
| | MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION. |
| | B. THE EXISTING ROAD CROWN APPEARS TO BE APPROX.. 4 |
| | FEET WEST OF THE ROAD CENTERLINE. |
| | |
| | 22. SECTION F-F??? |
| | A. INDICATE WHERE THE TRAVEL LANE CONSTRUCTION WILL |
| | MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION. |
| | |
| | 23. FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT, PROVIDE PLAN AND PROFILE |
| | SHEET OF THE RECONSTRUCTION OF BARCELONA ROAD FROM THE |
| | CENTERLINE OF S. DIXIE HWY TO APPROXIMATELY 230 FEET |
| | EAST OF THE S. DIXIE HWY CENTELINE. SHOW PROFILES OF |
| | ALL UTILITIES WITHIN THE R/W AND CROSS SECTIONS OF THE |
| | UTILITIES CROSSING THESE UTILITIES. |
| | |
| | TRACY WARD, PE |
| | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | 561-494-1120 (O) |
| | 561-351-0510 (M) |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
