| Date |
Text |
| 2022-09-06 09:20:00 | *** THE PROJECT AREA DOES NOT MATCH THE INFORMATION |
| | PROVIDED IN THE SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY AND AS A |
| | RESULT, THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROJECT ARE |
| | INCONSISTENT AND EXCEEDS THE STANDARDS/REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS). ADDITIONALLY, PER SEC. |
| | 94-207(A)(1)(B), THE DENSITY AND INTENSITY OF A PROJECT |
| | CANNOT EXCEED THE DENSITY AND INTENSITY STANDARDS |
| | PROVIDED IN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT |
| | POLICY 1.1.3. *** |
| | |
| | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) AS MENTIONED BY STAFF DURING THE PRE-APPLICATION |
| | MEETING WITH THE APPLICANT, PUBLIC OUTREACH ON THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IS CRITICAL (AND PRIOR TO |
| | THE FORMAL SUBMITTAL OF THE PROJECT). DOCUMENTATION OF |
| | ANY PUBLIC OUTREACH (AND RESULTS/FEEDBACK FROM THESE |
| | MEETINGS) WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS IS REQUIRED |
| | AND SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO PLANNING STAFF. |
| | |
| | 2.) THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE FAR IS 1.5 (RESIDENTIAL + |
| | NON-RESIDENTIAL). BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN |
| | THE PLAN SET, THE PROPOSED FAR FOR THE PROJECT IS 1.62, |
| | WHICH EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM AND IS NOT PERMITTED. PLEASE |
| | ADJUST PROJECT TO COMPLY. [ZLDR S.94-145(8)(D)] |
| | |
| | 3.) THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY HAS BEEN |
| | EXCEEDED. PER ZLDR S.94-145(9)(B), THE MAXIMUM |
| | ALLOWABLE DENSITY IS 32.27 DU/ACRE. THE PROPOSED |
| | PROJECT CURRENTLY HAS A DENSITY OF 32.7 DU/ACRE WHICH |
| | IS NOT PERMITTED. PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 4.) THE PROJECT DOES NOT APPEAR TO FACTOR IN THE |
| | BUILDING HEIGHT SETBACK ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL ZONING |
| | DISTRICTS. PER THE ZLDRS, IF A STRUCTURE ABUTS A |
| | RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT IN EXCESS OF 30 FT., THE |
| | FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL SETBACK SHALL BE PROVIDED: A) 1 |
| | FT. OF HEIGHT ABOVE 30 FT. FOR EACH 2 FT. OF SETBACK |
| | WHEN ABUTTING A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING |
| | DISTRICT AND B) 1 FT. OF HEIGHT ABOVE 30 FT. FOR EACH 1 |
| | FT. OF SETBACK WHEN ABUTTING ANY MULTIFAMILY |
| | RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT. THE BUILDING HEIGHT |
| | SETBACK IS IN ADDITION TO THE MINIMUM SETBACK |
| | REQUIREMENTS PROVIDED IN ZLDR S.94-145(2). [ZLDR |
| | S.94-145(6)] |
| | |
| | 5.) PROJECT INFORMATION IS INCONSISTENT THROUGHOUT THE |
| | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. PLEASE REVISE JUSTIFICATION |
| | STATEMENT TO ADDRESS ANY CORRECTIONS/INACCURACIES. |
| | |
| | 6.) JUSTIFICATION ON THE REQUESTED WAIVERS NEED TO BE |
| | EXPANDED TO IDENTIFY ANY MITIGATION MEASURES AND |
| | BENEFITS OF EACH WAIVER REQUEST TO THE GENERAL |
| | PUBLIC/SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD. |
| | |
| | 7.) TABLES PRESENTED WITHIN THE PLAN SET DOES NOT |
| | EFFECTIVELY PRESENT INFORMATION AND CAN BE IMPROVED |
| | AND/OR SIMPLIFIED. ALSO, DATA/CALCULATIONS PRESENTED |
| | ARE EITHER INCORRECT/INCOMPLETE OR DIFFICULT TO |
| | UNDERSTAND. PLEASE CONTACT STAFF FOR EXAMPLES ON DATA |
| | PRESENTATION (IF NECESSARY). |
| | |
| | 8.) PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS ARE NOT PERMITTED IN HISTORIC |
| | DISTRICTS. THEREFORE, ALL PD ASSOCIATED ZONING |
| | REQUIREMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED ON THE PARCEL(S) OF THE |
| | PROPOSED CPD. THERE APPEARS TO BE A PROPOSED LANDSCAPE |
| | BUFFER ON THE PROPERTY OF 309 BARCELONA (WITHIN THE EL |
| | CID HISTORIC DISTRICT). THIS IS NOT PERMITTED. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-207(A)(2)] |
| | |
| | 9.) REQUIRED OWNER'S CONSENT FORMS HAVE NOT BEEN |
| | PROPERTY EXECUTED. PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 10.) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW |
| | LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION IS |
| | REQUIRED (561-684-4030). ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED IN |
| | THE TPS LETTER MUST MATCH PROJECT INFORMATION FOR |
| | CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 11.) INFORMATION IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY (PREPARED BY |
| | BRYAN G. KELLEY, P.E., OF SIMMONS AND WHITE, DATED |
| | 8/8/2022) IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE PROJECT INFORMATION |
| | PRESENTED IN THE PLAN SET (I.E. BUILDING SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE; ALSO, RESIDENTIAL DENSITY PROPOSED (59 UNITS) |
| | IS NOT PERMITTED AS IT EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE |
| | DENSITY). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 12.) INFORMATION IN THE SHARED PARKING STATEMENT |
| | (PREPARED BY BRYAN G. KELLEY, P.E., OF SIMMONS AND |
| | WHITE, DATED 8/8/2022) IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE PROJECT |
| | INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THE PLAN SET (I.E. BUILDING |
| | SQUARE FOOTAGE; ALSO, RESIDENTIAL DENSITY PROPOSED (59 |
| | UNITS) IS NOT PERMITTED AS IT EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM |
| | ALLOWABLE DENSITY). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 13.) A NEW SCAD LETTER FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY IS REQUIRED. THE SCAD LETTER INCLUDED IN |
| | THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CONTAINS OUTDATED INFORMATION |
| | AND IS EXPIRED. INFORMATION IN THE SCAD LETTER MUST |
| | MATCH THE PROJECT INFORMATION FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 14.) THE HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES, INCLUDING EXEMPT ITEMS |
| | OR EQUIPMENT, SHALL NOT EXCEED LIMITATIONS PRESCRIBED |
| | BY THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA) WITHIN |
| | DESIGNATED FLIGHT APPROACH PATTERNS OF AIRPORTS OR |
| | RELATED AVIATION FACILITIES. ALTHOUGH STAFF DOES NOT |
| | BELIEVE THIS WILL BE AN ISSUE, PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER |
| | FROM THE FAA INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS NO |
| | HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION. [ZLDR S.94-306(B)] |
| | |
| | 15.) AN ADDRESS LIST, RADIUS MAP AND EXECUTED ADDRESS |
| | LIST AFFIDAVIT IS REQUIRED PER THE INSTRUCTIONS ON PAGE |
| | 4 OF THE 2022 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. THIS INFORMATION |
| | WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 16.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC |
| | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR |
| | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE |
| | COLLECTION SERVICES. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF WEST |
| | PALM BEACH ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561-494-1117). |
| | |
| | 17.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| | CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH |
| | INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE |
| | PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES. |
| | |
| | 18.) PER SEC. 94-207(B)(10)(C), THE APPLICATION SHALL |
| | INCLUDE THE PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT WHICH |
| | IDENTIFIES THE ANTICIPATED PROJECT START AND COMPLETION |
| | DATES, STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT (IF ANY), AND THE AREA AND |
| | LOCATION OF COMMON OPEN SPACE TO BE PROVIDED AT EACH |
| | STAGE. THIS INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED IN THE |
| | APPLICATION SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 19.) ALL PLAN SHEETS SHALL MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY. NOT |
| | ALL PLAN SHEETS MATCH. PLEASE ENSURE ALL PLAN SHEETS |
| | MATCH PRIOR TO THE RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1) ANY PETITION FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE |
| | ACCOMPANIED BY A MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF THE |
| | DEVELOPMENT COMPRISED OF THE ELEMENTS LISTED IN SEC. |
| | 94-207(B)(9) AND THE SITE PLAN CHECKLIST ON PAGE 16/30 |
| | OF THE 2022 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. THE MASTER |
| | DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS REQUIRED TO SHOW THE PROJECT IN |
| | RELATIONSHIP TO ITS IMMEDIATE SURROUNDINGS AND WITH |
| | EXISTING STRUCTURES. IT IS ALSO CRITICAL TO INCLUDE ALL |
| | RELEVANT INFORMATION/DATA IN THE PLAN (I.E. |
| | BUILDING/STRUCTURAL SETBACKS, CRITICAL DIMENSIONS, |
| | BICYCLE PARKING, ZONING AND WAIVER TABULARS, ETC.). |
| | |
| | 2.) A WAIVER TABULAR, SPECIFYING EACH WAIVER REQUESTED |
| | FOR THE PROJECT AND ANY PERTINENT INFORMATION (I.E. |
| | REFERENCE CODE SECTION, INFORMATION ON |
| | REQUIRED/PROPOSED, ETC.) SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PLAN |
| | SET FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | 3.) THE FOLLOWING SHEETS ARE MISSING FROM THE PLAN SET |
| | (REFERENCE: COVER SHEET A0.00): A) OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM |
| | (A0.04) B) BUILDING SECTION (A3.01) |
| | |
| | 4.) MORE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED ON THE CALCULATIONS |
| | FOR THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDINGS (MAXIMUM IS |
| | 60%; PROVIDED 68%). ILLUSTRATE WITH DIAGRAMS WHERE |
| | NECESSARY. [ZLDR S.94-145(3)] |
| | |
| | 5.) MORE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED ON THE CALCULATIONS |
| | FOR MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY IMPERMEABLE SURFACE |
| | (MAXIMUM IS 85%); NO INFORMATION ON THE PROVIDED |
| | IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE. ILLUSTRATE WITH DIAGRAMS |
| | WHERE NECESSARY TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-145(4)] |
| | |
| | 6.) MORE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED ON THE MINIMUM OPEN |
| | SPACE AND LANDSCAPE AREA CALCULATIONS. ILLUSTRATE WITH |
| | DIAGRAMS WHERE NECESSARY. [ZLDR S.94-145(5)] |
| | |
| | 7.) PLANS MUST CLEARLY SHOW THE PROVIDE BUILDING |
| | SETBACKS FOR THE PROJECT. THE BUILDING SETBACK IS |
| | MEASURED FROM THE OUTSIDE WALL(S) OF THE BUILDING TO |
| | THE PROPERTY LINE(S). ADDITIONALLY, INCLUDE DIMENSIONS |
| | FOR ALL STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED |
| | TO BALCONIES, CORNICES, BUTTERS, EAVES AND ROOF |
| | OVERHANG PROJECTIONS; STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS SHALL NOT |
| | EXTEND FARTHER THAN 33 FT. INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK. |
| | [ZLDR S.94-305(B)(2)] |
| | |
| | 8.) ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS SHOW AWNINGS. AWNINGS |
| | SHALL NOT PROJECT MORE THAN 4 FT. INTO ANY REQUIRED |
| | SETBACK OR BE SUPPORTED BY ANY MEANS OTHER THAN |
| | ATTACHMENT TO THE BUILDING. IF AWNINGS ARE PROPOSED, |
| | THE AWNING MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED/IDENTIFIED IN THE |
| | PLANS; THE OUTLINE FOR THE AWNING MUST HAVE DIMENSIONS |
| | TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDRS. ADDITIONALLY, |
| | IF THE AWNING ENCROACHES BEYOND THE PROPERTY LINE AND |
| | INTO A RIGHT-OF-WAY, ADDITIONAL APPROVALS FROM THE |
| | REGULATING AGENCY WILL BE REQUIRED. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-305(B)(5)] |
| | |
| | 9.) AT ANY ROAD INTERSECTIONS, VISIBILITY SHALL NOT BE |
| | OBSCURED BY THE CONSTRUCTION, PLACEMENT, OR MAINTENANCE |
| | OF A STRUCTURE WALL, SIGN, FENCE, BERM, PLANT MATERIAL, |
| | SHRUBS OR ANY SIMILAR ITEM BETWEEN 18 INCHES OR 8 FT. |
| | WITHIN THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE. BASED ON STAFF?S REVIEW |
| | OF THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS, THERE ARE AWNINGS |
| | ILLUSTRATED ON THE BUILDING WHICH APPEARS TO ENCROACH |
| | INTO THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR |
| | CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS AND PLAN SET. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-305(E)] |
| | |
| | 10.) IN NON-RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, NO FENCE, HEDGE OR |
| | WALL SHALL EXCEED 8 FT. IN HEIGHT WITHIN THE REQUIRED |
| | SIDE AND REAR SETBACKS. FENCES/WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED |
| | 48 INCHES IN HEIGHT WITHIN THE REQUIRED FRONT SETBACK. |
| | SHOW HEIGHT (AND DETAIL, IF APPLICABLE) OF ALL WALL |
| | SEGMENTS PROPOSED WITHIN THE PROJECT TO DEMONSTRATE |
| | COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-302(C)] |
| | |
| | 11.) THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS TO A PUBLIC |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY IS TWO (2). THERE APPEARS TO BE THREE (3) |
| | ACCESS POINTS FOR THE EL FLAMINGO BUILDING ALONG |
| | FLAMINGO DRIVE. PLEASE ADDRESS. [ZLDR S.94-312(1)(A)] |
| | |
| | 12.) THE PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM |
| | REQUIREMENTS FOR SEPARATION OF ACCESS POINTS. PLEASE |
| | ADDRESS. [ZLDR S.94-312(2)] |
| | |
| | |
| | PARKING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PARKING CALCULATIONS REQUIRE FURTHER BREAKDOWN OF |
| | USES (I.E. NUMBER OF SEATS, SQUARE FOOTAGES, RESERVED |
| | SPACES, ETC.). TO CLEARLY SHOW PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND |
| | HOW THEY?VE BEEN MET. ALSO, THE PARKING CALCULATIONS |
| | PROVIDED ARE INACCURATE AND MUST BE CORRECTED FOR |
| | ACCURACY (I.E. RETAIL SQUARE FOOTAGE; WHERE?S THE |
| | GALLERY?). |
| | |
| | 2.) SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS (PREPARED BY BRYAN G. |
| | KELLEY, P.E., OF SIMMONS & WHITE, DATED 8/8/2022) AND |
| | CALCULATIONS APPEAR TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 94-484. ADDITIONALLY, PARKING |
| | SPACES WHERE ARE RESERVED FOR USE BY SPECIFIED |
| | INDIVIDUALS OR CLASSES OF INDIVIDUALS SHALL NOT BE |
| | COUNTED TOWARDS MEETING THE SHARED PARKING |
| | REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE |
| | ZLDRS. [ZLDR S.94-484] |
| | |
| | 3.) PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF TURNAROUND SPACES |
| | IN THE PARKING GARAGE(S) WHERE NECESSARY TO ADDRESS |
| | ADEQUATE VEHICULAR CIRCULATION. |
| | |
| | 4.) PROVIDE AN AUTO-TURN DIAGRAM FOR LOADING. PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT CONFIGURATION WHICH REQUIRE BACKING DIRECTLY |
| | ONTO A STREET FROM A PARKING OR LOADING SPACE FOR A |
| | MIXED-USE PROJECT IS PROHIBITED IN ALL RESIDENTIAL AND |
| | NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS. THERE SHALL BE A |
| | MINIMUM OF 10 FT. BETWEEN ACCESS DRIVES. ALSO, PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MENTIONS THE |
| | AUTO-TURN DIAGRAM WHICH HAS NOT BEEN FOUND. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-485(J)] |
| | |
| | 5.) ALL NECESSARY DIMENSIONS IN THE PARKING LAYOUT |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDRS. [ZLDR S.94-485(N)(2)] |
| | |
| | 6.) IN ADDITION TO THE PARKING LAYOUT FOR THE PROJECT, |
| | A PARKING STALL DETAIL IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS SHALL BE PROVIDED. THE DETAIL |
| | MUST BE INCLUDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | ZLDRS. [ZLDR S.94-485(N)] |
| | |
| | 7.) ARE ANY COMPACT PARKING SPACES PROPOSED IN THE |
| | PROJECT? IF SO, INFORMATION ON THE COMPACT PARKING |
| | SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED/COMPLY WITH THE COMPACT |
| | PARKING REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS. [ZLDR S.94-485(N)] |
| | |
| | 8.) IS THERE ANY ON-STREET PARKING PROPOSED FOR THE |
| | PROJECT? IF SO, PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION (I.E. |
| | LOCATION, DIMENSIONS, CALCULATIONS, ETC.). |
| | |
| | 9.) THERE IS INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION PROVIDED ON |
| | ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS |
| | (REQUIRED AND PROPOSED) AND SHOW LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE |
| | PARKING SPACES WITHIN THE PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE |
| | COMPLIANCE/CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-485(O)] |
| | |
| | 10.) REQUIRED/PROPOSED LOADING SPACE |
| | INFORMATION/CALCULATIONS MISSING FROM THE PLAN SET. |
| | [ZLDR S.94-485(P)] |
| | |
| | 11.) BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR THE PROJECT HAS |
| | NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. THE PLANS MUST SHOW THE |
| | CALCULATIONS (REQUIRED AND PROVIDED), LOCATION AND |
| | DETAIL CONSISTENT WITH THE ZLDRS AND THE CITY?S BICYCLE |
| | PARKING GUIDELINES (CONTACT STAFF FOR DOCUMENT). [ZLDR |
| | S.94-485(Q)] |
| | |
| | 12.) WHEEL STOPS ARE ILLUSTRATED FOR ALL TANDEM PARKING |
| | SPACES. TO ACCURATELY DEPICT THE FUNCTION OF THE TANDEM |
| | PARKING SPACES, THE WHEEL STOPS SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM |
| | THE OUTER STALL OF THE TANDEM PARKING. ALSO, PLANS MUST |
| | ALSO SHOW WHICH TANDEM SPACES ARE RESERVED FOR |
| | RESIDENTIAL AND WHICH ARE RESERVED FOR VALET (PER |
| | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT). |
| | |
| | 13.) A NOTE CLEARLY STATING THAT THE TANDEM PARKING |
| | SPACES WILL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND RESERVED FOR |
| | VALET/RESIDENTIAL SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) BUILDING HEIGHT INFORMATION INCOMPLETE IN THE |
| | ELEVATIONS. PLEASE PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE |
| | AND CONSISTENT WITH SEC. 94-145 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL |
| | DISTRICT), SEC. 94-306 (HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS) AND SEC. |
| | 94-611 (HEIGHT OF STRUCTURE). |
| | |
| | 2.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE FLOOR PLANS: A) |
| | PROVIDE A LEGEND THAT IDENTIFIES WHAT THE COLOR |
| | COORDINATION MEANS. B) NOT ALL SPACES IN THE FLOOR PLAN |
| | SHEETS HAVE BEEN LABELED. THIS IS CRITICAL TO DETERMINE |
| | IF THE SPACES SHOULD/SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE FAR |
| | CALCULATIONS. C) NOTATE NON AIR-CONDITIONED SPACES. IT |
| | IS IMPORTANT IN VERIFYING WHETHER OR NOT SPACES SHOULD |
| | BE INCLUDED IN THE FAR CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 3.) IN THE FAR BUILDING AREA TABLE (SHEET A0.03), WHAT |
| | ARE THE NOTATIONS IN THE PARENTHESIS? |
| | |
| | 4.) HOW MANY BEDROOMS ARE PROVIDED IN THE GROUND LEVEL |
| | FLATS? THE INFORMATION SHOULD BE NOTATED IN THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | |
| | LIGHTING/PHOTOMETRIC COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) NO LIGHTING/PHOTOMETRIC PLAN/INFORMATION PROVIDED |
| | WITH THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL. PER ZLDR |
| | S.94-207(D)(8), ANY SOURCE OF ILLUMINATION LOCATED WITH |
| | A CPD SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE FOOTCANDLE AT OR BEYOND THE |
| | BOUNDARIES OF SUCH DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | INFORMATION AND A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE |
| | COMPLIANCE; SETBACK DIMENSIONS FROM POLE FIXTURE(S) (IF |
| | APPLICABLE) TO THE PROPERTY LINE(S) SHALL ALSO BE |
| | PROVIDED. PHOTOMETRIC SPILLOVER BEYOND THE PROPERTY |
| | LINE(S) IS ALSO REQUIRED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 2.) PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING NOTE IN THE PLANS FOR |
| | CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING: ALL |
| | OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND |
| | SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT, OR GLARE AWAY FROM |
| | ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT |
| | RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES. |
| | |
| | |
| | SIGNAGE COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) THERE IS A CONFLICT WITH THE SIGNAGE INFORMATION |
| | PRESENTED FOR THE PROJECT. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT |
| | INCLUDES A WAIVER TO SIGNAGE (BUT NO SPECIFIC DETAILS); |
| | HOWEVER, THE PLAN SHEETS STATE: "ALL PROPOSED SIGANGE |
| | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE SIGNAGE REGULATIONS OF THE |
| | UNDERLYING ZONING DISTRICT." PLEASE ADDRESS FOR |
| | CONSISTENCY. THE APPLICATION MUST CLEARLY STATE WHAT IS |
| | THE WAIVER TO THE SIGN CODE REQUIREMENTS, MUST INCLUDE |
| | SIGNAGE PROPOSAL FOR THE PROJECT (SIGN PROGRAM, |
| | INCLUDING DIMENSIONS, ETC.), JUSTIFICATION, MITIGATION |
| | MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) AND BENEFIT TO THE COMMUNITY |
| | IF A WAIVER IS BEING SOUGHT FOR SIGNAGE. |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR |
| | (4) PAPER COPIES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 |
| | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND |
| | DOCUMENTS. THREE (3) HARD COPY SETS SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | IN FULL COLOR. |
| | |
| | * ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE |
| | ($600). |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (5661) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTES: |
| | |
| | * DEDICATION, RESERVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF PROPERTY |
| | FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, STREETS, SCHOOLS, PARKS, MASS |
| | TRANSIT FACILITIES OR OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES MAY BE |
| | REQUIRED AS A CONDITION OR REQUIREMENT OF THE PLANNED |
| | DEVELOPMENT. [ZLDR S.94-207(B)(3)] |
| | |
| | * ALL UTILITIES, INCLUDING TELEPHONE, CABLE TELEVISION |
| | AND ELECTRICAL SERVICE SYSTEMS, SHALL BE INSTALLED |
| | UNDERGROUND. [ZLDR S.94-207(B)(5)] |
| | |
| | * OUTDOOR STORAGE FACILITIES ARE PROHIBITED. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-207(D)(9)] |
| | |
| | * DEVELOPMENT SHALL PROVIDE FOR ADEQUATE DRAINAGE AND |
| | STORMWATER |
| | |
| |
Print |
