| Date |
Text |
| 2023-03-28 12:36:14 | 3/28/23 ??? FAILED |
| | |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | F) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT |
| | DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE |
| | COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED. |
| | |
| | 1. PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT WAS INCORRECTLY |
| | NOTARIZED. [SATISFIED] |
| | 2. SURVEY WAS NOT SIGNED/SEALED AND DOES NOT HAVE THE |
| | TITLE ABSTRACT INFORMATION INCLUDED. [PARTIALLY |
| | SATISFIED] |
| | 3. FUTURE LAND USE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | SEE COMMENTS ISSUED BY ALEX HANSEN, CITY COMPREHENSIVE |
| | PLANNER. [SATISFIED] |
| | 4. FUTURE LAND USE LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED. SEE COMMENTS ISSUED BY ALEX HANSEN, CITY |
| | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNER. [SATISFIED] |
| | 5. PLEASE PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC |
| | OUTREACH, SUPPORT LETTERS, ETC. AS WELL AS ANY |
| | INFORMATION PERTAINING TO UPCOMING EFFORTS. [PARTIALLY |
| | SATISFIED] |
| | 6. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION/JUSTIFICATION REGARDING |
| | THE LOSS OF VERY VIABLE HOUSING UNITS, SPECIFICALLY |
| | HOUSING UNITS THAT APPEAR TO BE MORE AFFORDABLE, AND |
| | ARE OFTEN CONSIDERED AS THE "MISSING MIDDLE", |
| | ESPECIALLY DURING A TIME WHEN THE CITY IS EXPERIENCING |
| | SIGNIFICANT GROWTH AND A LACK OF SUCH HOUSING. THE |
| | "MISSING MIDDLE" IS OFTEN DEFINED AS HOUSING TYPES |
| | THAT..."PROVIDE DIVERSE HOUSING OPTIONS, SUCH AS |
| | DUPLEXES, FOURPLEXES, COTTAGE COURTS, AND MULTIPLEXES. |
| | THESE HOUSE-SCALE BUILDINGS FIT SEAMLESSLY INTO |
| | EXISTING RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS AND SUPPORT |
| | WALKABILITY, LOCALLY-SERVING RETAIL, AND PUBLIC |
| | TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS. THEY PROVIDE SOLUTIONS ALONG A |
| | SPECTRUM OF AFFORDABILITY TO ADDRESS THE MISMATCH |
| | BETWEEN THE AVAILABLE U.S. HOUSING STOCK AND SHIFTING |
| | DEMOGRAPHICS COMBINED WITH THE GROWING DEMAND FOR |
| | WALKABILITY." [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | 7. ALL OUTSTANDING PUBLIC UTILITIES LETTER SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | 8. PLEASE PROVIDE FIRM EVIDENCE OF THE UNIFIED CONTROL |
| | OF THE ENTIRE AREA WITHIN THE PETITION AND A STATEMENT |
| | FROM THE APPLICANT AS INDICATED IN THE SECTION P. OF |
| | THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE A MARKET STUDY/ANALYSIS EVALUATING |
| | THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO THE |
| | CITY, THE TIMING OF ANY PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, ETC. |
| | 10. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER 2., |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A SIGNED/SEALED SURVEY. |
| | 11. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER 5., |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE ALL THE SIGNED LETTERS OF SUPPORT FROM |
| | THE RESIDENTS IDENTIFIED IN THE EXCEL FILE (???500 FT |
| | SUPPORT??? SPECIFIC SHEET). |
| | |
| | |
| | KEVIE DEFRANC |
| | SENIOR PLANNER ??? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-822-1449 |
| | |
| |
Print |
