| Date |
Text |
| 2023-05-08 11:46:47 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS |
| | 1) SATISFIED. SCHEDULE A METHODOLOGY MEETING TO DISCUSS |
| | AND SETUP A QUEUE ANALYSIS THAT PROPERLY CAPTURES THE |
| | EXISTING QUEUEING ISSUE AT THE FACILITY AND PROVIDES A |
| | BASELINE TO COMPARE WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. |
| | MOREOVER, AN INTERSECTION ANALYSIS OF OLIVE AND |
| | SOUTHERN BLVD MAY BE NEEDED AND DATA COLLECTION SHOULD |
| | BE PERFORMED DURING THE REAL PEAK HOUR AT THE FACILITY |
| | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER |
| | |
| | SITE COMMENTS |
| | 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE |
| | PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION |
| | RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, |
| | PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, |
| | GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER & |
| | DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY |
| | LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD BE NAMED |
| | T-1.0 |
| | 4) SATISFIED. IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE |
| | BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT |
| | MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF |
| | THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING |
| | PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. SUCH |
| | PLAN IS PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE |
| | NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T-1.1 OR T-2.0) |
| | 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE |
| | TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND |
| | WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT |
| | COLORS. PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS IN A SEPARATE SHEET. SUCH |
| | PLAN(S) CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART OF THE |
| | TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY |
| | (E.G. T1.2, T-3.0) |
| | 7) SATISFIED. WILL THE DRIVEWAY ON SOUTHERN BLVD BE |
| | OPEN FOR CUSTOMERS TO ENTER THE FACILITY? BASED ON THE |
| | CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN, IT SEEMS THAT VEHICLES |
| | ENTERING FROM THE SOUTHERN BLVD DRIVEWAY ARE NOT ABLE |
| | OR FORBIDDEN TO TURNAROUND AND ENTER THE CARWASH QUEUE. |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | 8) SATISFIED. THERE IS A CONFLICT POINT BETWEEN |
| | VEHICLES ENTERING FROM THE SOUTHERN BLVD DRIVEWAY AND |
| | THE ONES EXITING THE CAR WASH FACILITY. ASSUMING |
| | ENTERING VEHICLES HAVE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE ONES FROM |
| | THE CAR WASH SHOULD COME TO A STOP, BEFORE HEADING |
| | SOUTH. THUS, PROPER PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNAGE (I.E. |
| | STOP/YIELD) SHOULD BE INSTALLED TO REGULATE INTERNAL |
| | CIRCULATION |
| | 9) SATISFIED. THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ON OLIVE DOES NOT |
| | SEEM TO MEET THE MINIMUM CORNER CLEARANCE DISTANCE. A |
| | VARIANCE MAY BE REQUIRED |
| | 10) SATISFIED. IT IS RECOMMENDED TO MAKE THE PROPOSED |
| | DRIVEWAY ON OLIVE AS ENTRY-ONLY, AND INSTALL ANOTHER |
| | DRIVEWAY EXIT-ONLY ON MALVERNE RD |
| | 11) SATISFIED. A RIGHT-TURN STORAGE/DECELERATION LANE |
| | SHOULD BE INSTALLED ALONG OLIVE NORTH OF THE DRIVEWAY, |
| | SO TO PROVIDE EXTRA STACKING AND REDUCE THE POSSIBILITY |
| | OF QUEUE SPILLBACKS |
| | 12) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CROSSWALK ACROSS MALVERNE AT |
| | THE INTERSECTION WITH OLIVE AVE |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
