| Date |
Text |
| 2022-09-08 11:07:32 | |
| | 1) PLEASE SCHEDULE A METHODOLOGY MEETING TO DISCUSS AND |
| | SETUP A QUEUE ANALYSIS THAT PROPERLY CAPTURES THE |
| | EXISTING QUEUEING ISSUE AT THE FACILITY AND PROVIDES A |
| | BASELINE TO COMPARE WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. |
| | MOREOVER, AN INTERSECTION ANALYSIS OF OLIVE AND |
| | SOUTHERN BLVD MAY BE NEEDED AND DATA COLLECTION SHOULD |
| | BE PERFORMED DURING THE REAL PEAK HOUR AT THE FACILITY |
| | 2) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER |
| | 3) PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE |
| | GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION RELATED |
| | FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, PARKING |
| | STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, GATES, |
| | CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER & DRIVEWAY |
| | SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED |
| | AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD BE NAMED T-1.0 |
| | 4) IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB |
| | DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, |
| | PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS |
| | SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | 5) PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN. |
| | INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. SUCH |
| | PLAN IS PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE |
| | NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T-1.1 OR T-2.0) |
| | 6) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR |
| | SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND WHEEL |
| | PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT COLORS. |
| | PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS IN A SEPARATE SHEET. SUCH PLAN(S) |
| | CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION |
| | REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T1.2, |
| | T-3.0) |
| | 7) WILL THE DRIVEWAY ON SOUTHERN BLVD BE OPEN FOR |
| | CUSTOMERS TO ENTER THE FACILITY? BASED ON THE |
| | CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN, IT SEEMS THAT VEHICLES |
| | ENTERING FROM THE SOUTHERN BLVD DRIVEWAY ARE NOT ABLE |
| | OR FORBIDDEN TO TURNAROUND AND ENTER THE CARWASH QUEUE. |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | 8) THERE IS A CONFLICT POINT BETWEEN VEHICLES ENTERING |
| | FROM THE SOUTHERN BLVD DRIVEWAY AND THE ONES EXITING |
| | THE CAR WASH FACILITY. ASSUMING ENTERING VEHICLES HAVE |
| | THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE ONES FROM THE CAR WASH SHOULD |
| | COME TO A STOP, BEFORE HEADING SOUTH. THUS, PROPER |
| | PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNAGE (I.E. STOP/YIELD) SHOULD |
| | BE INSTALLED TO REGULATE INTERNAL CIRCULATION |
| | 9) THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ON OLIVE DOES NOT SEEM TO MEET |
| | THE MINIMUM CORNER CLEARANCE DISTANCE. A VARIANCE MAY |
| | BE REQUIRED |
| | 10) IT IS RECOMMENDED TO MAKE THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ON |
| | OLIVE AS ENTRY-ONLY, AND INSTALL ANOTHER DRIVEWAY |
| | EXIT-ONLY ON MALVERNE RD |
| | 11) A RIGHT-TURN STORAGE/DECELERATION LANE SHOULD BE |
| | INSTALLED ALONG OLIVE NORTH OF THE DRIVEWAY, SO TO |
| | PROVIDE EXTRA STACKING AND REDUCE THE POSSIBILITY OF |
| | QUEUE SPILLBACKS |
| | 12) PROVIDE A CROSSWALK ACROSS MALVERNE AT THE |
| | INTERSECTION WITH OLIVE AVE |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
