| Date |
Text |
| 2023-06-20 00:51:26 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS |
| | 1) NOT SATISFIED. GIVEN THE CHANGE IN SQUARE FOOTAGE, |
| | CIRCULATION AND DRIVEWAY CONFIGURATION. PROVIDE AN |
| | UPDATED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. LATEST RESUBMISSION DID NOT |
| | PROVIDE A REVISED OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT PLAN |
| | 2) PLEASE PROVIDE FURTHER NARRATIVE AND ELABORATION |
| | PERTAINING THE EXPECTED QUEUES WITHIN THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT AS WELL AS THE SURROUNDING ROADWAY NETWORK. |
| | THE LATTER IS SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACTED DURING PICK-UP |
| | OPERATIONS, DUE TO PARENTAL VEHICLES ARRIVING AHEAD OF |
| | TIME CAUSING QUEUE SPILLBACKS AND TRAVEL LANES BLOCKAGE |
| | ON N FLAGLER DRIVE |
| | 3) THE CONCLUSION IN THE REPORT IS BASED ON A TRIVIAL |
| | EVALUATION, INSTEAD OF TRAFFIC ENGINEERING PRINCIPLES |
| | AND METHODOLOGIES. THUS, PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE |
| | QUEUE ANALYSIS, INCLUSIVE OF PROPERLY CALCULATED |
| | DISCHARGE RATES |
| | |
| | SITE COMMENTS |
| | 4) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN TRANSPORTATION |
| | SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING |
| | TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, |
| | DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, |
| | DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, |
| | CORNER & DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) |
| | PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD |
| | BE NAMED T-1.0. PROPOSED TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL EXHIBIT IS |
| | INCOMPLETE |
| | 5) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE |
| | SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, |
| | PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE |
| | OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT. PROPOSED TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL EXHIBIT IS |
| | INCOMPLETE |
| | 6) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT |
| | MARKING PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE |
| | SITE. THE SITE PLAN IS PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION |
| | REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T-1.1 OR |
| | T-2.0). THE PROPOSED TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL EXHIBIT DOES |
| | NOT CONTAIN THE REQUESTED INFORMATION |
| | 7) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE |
| | TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND |
| | WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT |
| | COLORS. SITE PLAN(S) CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART |
| | OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED |
| | ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T1.2, T-3.0). NO REVISED PLANS IN |
| | LATEST SUBMISSION |
| | 8) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND |
| | SPECS SHEETS FOR EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION |
| | FEATURES (E.G. CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT |
| | MARKING, SIGNAL, ETC.). PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME |
| | AND SHEET NUMBER, AS THE PROPOSED TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL |
| | EXHIBIT DOES NOT CONTAIN THE REQUESTED INFORMATION |
| | 9) NOT SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE TWO EASILY |
| | ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 |
| | FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH |
| | THE FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC) |
| | TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V / |
| | 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE INSERT THIS FEATURE IN THE |
| | T-1.0 OR T1.1 SITE PLAN. IDEALLY, ONE STATION SHOULD BE |
| | LOCATED ON OLIVE, WHILE THE OTHER ON FLAGLER |
| | 10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE |
| | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, |
| | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. NO REVISED PLANS IN |
| | LATEST SUBMISSION |
| | 11) SATISFIED. IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN PLAN, |
| | PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND |
| | PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE NUMBER |
| | OF METERED STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED, |
| | IF ANY |
| | 12) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, |
| | CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE |
| | FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK |
| | 13) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY BUS STOPS BEING IMPACTED? |
| | 14) SATISFIED. UNLESS THE ANGLE PARKING STALLS OF THE |
| | EASTERN PARKING LOT BY THE INTRACOASTAL ARE REVERSED, |
| | IT IS RECOMMENDED TO CHANGE DIRECTIONALITY. ENTRY |
| | DRIVEWAY SHOULD BE ON THE NORTH, WHILE EXIT ONE TO THE |
| | SOUTH |
| | 15) SATISFIED. SOME OF THE STALLS AND DRIVE AISLE OF |
| | THE EASTERN PARKING LOT BY THE INTRACOASTAL ARE NOT |
| | CODE COMPLIANT. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY |
| | 16) NOT SATISFIED. PICK-UP/DROP OFF AREA FOR THE |
| | ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SHOULD BE RELOCATED TO THE NORTHERN |
| | SIDE OF THE PARKING LOT, SO TO PROVIDE A LONGER STAKING |
| | DISTANCE. THERE IS A DISCREPANCY WITH THE PSP-1 SITE |
| | PLAN AND THE ONE SHOWN IN THE OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. NO |
| | REVISED PLANS IN LATEST SUBMISSION |
| | 17) SATISFIED. PICK-UP/DROP OFF AREA FOR THE EARLY |
| | CHILDHOOD SCHOOL SHOULD BE RELOCATED FURTHER SOUTH BY |
| | THE MIDDLE SCHOOL DROP OFF, SO TO PROVIDE A LONGER |
| | STAKING DISTANCE |
| | 18) NOT SATISFIED. THE FOUR PARKING STALLS BY THE |
| | 1-STORY GYMNASIUM SHOULD BE EITHER REMOVED, AND |
| | REPLACED BY A SIDEWALK SO TO PROVIDE LONGER STAKING BY |
| | DESIGNATING THE AREA FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD SCHOOL |
| | PICK-UP/DROP-OFF, OR CONVERTED TO ADA, AS THEY ARE THE |
| | CLOSEST AND SAFEST ONES TO THE ENTRANCE. THE REMOVAL OF |
| | SUCH STALLS WAS EXPLAINED AND AGREED UPON, AS BESIDES |
| | INCREASING THE QUEUE STACK, IT ALSO HELPS REDUCING |
| | CONFLICT POINTS AND INCREASING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY |
| | 19) NOT SATISFIED. INSTALL HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS |
| | ACROSS 7TH AND 8TH ST AT THE INTERSECTION OF FLAGLER |
| | DR. PLEASE PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS AND SHOWCASE THE ITEM |
| | ON THE PLANS |
| | 20) SATISFIED. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET SIDEWALK |
| | ALONG THE NORTHERN SIDE OF 7TH ST |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
