| Date |
Text |
| 2022-11-11 02:42:02 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS |
| | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DETAILED TRAFFIC STUDY. A |
| | METHODOLOGY MEETING SHALL BE SCHEDULED PRIOR TO |
| | DRAFTING THE ANALYSIS. |
| | 2) PLEASE INSERT PERTINENT SUMMARY TABLES AND FIGURES |
| | WITHIN THE MAIN BODY OF THE REPORT, SUCH AS DRIVEWAY |
| | VOLUMES, SITE LOCATION, TRIP GENERATION, LOS SUMMARY, |
| | ETC. APPENDIX SHOULD BE USED AND REFERENCED FOR LARGE |
| | TABLES AND FIGURES SUCH AS SYNCHRO OUTPUTS, SIGNAL |
| | PLANS, BACKGROUND VOLUMES, ETC. SEVERAL SAMPLE TRAFFIC |
| | STUDIES HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. PLEASE REFER TO THOSE |
| | STUDIES FOR PROPER FORMATTING AND REFERENCING |
| | 3) PLEASE NAME AND/OR NUMBER EACH TABLE, FIGURE AND |
| | REFERENCED DOCUMENT |
| | 4) PLEASE INSERT PAGE NUMBERING THROUGHOUT THE REPORT, |
| | INCLUDING THE APPENDIX, AND UPDATE THE TABLE OF CONTENT |
| | ACCORDINGLY |
| | 5) PLEASE REVISE FIGURE 2. PERCENTAGES SHOULD BE PLACED |
| | MID-BLOCK AND PROPERLY ADD-UP. IT SEEMS ONLY 50% OF THE |
| | TRAFFIC IS COMING IN/OUT OF THE SITE |
| | 6) PLEASE REVISE FIGURE 3. TURNING MOVEMENTS WITH NO |
| | VOLUMES SHOULD BE REMOVED, DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES |
| | PROVIDED |
| | |
| | SITE COMMENTS |
| | 7) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN TRANSPORTATION |
| | SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING |
| | TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, |
| | DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, |
| | DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, |
| | CORNER & DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) |
| | PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD |
| | BE NAMED T-1.0. PLEASE PROVIDE A SPECIFIC SITE PLAN AS |
| | REQUESTED. SHEET A1 AND C5 DO NOT PROPERLY DEPICT NOR |
| | PROVIDE ALL THE REQUESTED ITEMS. MOREOVER, ITEMS |
| | IMPACTING PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT SUCH AS PLANTERS AND |
| | TRAFFIC/UTILITY POLES ALONG THE SIDEWALK AREAS MUST BE |
| | SHOWN; BASED ON THOSE ITEMS AND ALONG CHOKE POINTS, THE |
| | EFFECTIVE SIDEWALK WIDTH SHOULD BE PROPERLY SHOWN AND |
| | DIMENSIONED |
| | 8) NOT SATISFIED. IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE |
| | SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, |
| | PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, GARAGE ENTRANCES, |
| | ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE A SPECIFIC |
| | TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN AS REQUESTED |
| | 9) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGNAGE |
| | PLAN IS INCOMPLETE. PLEASE PROVIDE ALL EXISTING AND |
| | PROPOSED FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND |
| | ALONG ALL THE ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. THIS SITE PLAN |
| | CAN BE CONSIDERED PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND |
| | COULD BE EITHER INCLUDED IN THE T-1 SITE PLAN OR NAMED |
| | T-1.2. RESPONSE LETTER INDICATES SHEET C-7, CORRECT |
| | SHEET WOULD BE C-8. NONETHELESS, INSTALL A ONE-WAY SIGN |
| | ON THE EAST LEG OF THE ROSEMARY & 4TH ST INTERSECTION, |
| | STOP SIGN AND STOP BARS SHOULD BE INSTALLED AT EACH |
| | GARAGE AND DRIVEWAY EXITS, SERVICE DRIVEWAYS SHOULD BE |
| | INDICATED AD SIGNED AS SUCH, DEAD-END DRIVEWAYS SHOULD |
| | BE SIGNED AS SUCH. |
| | 10) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR |
| | GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND |
| | OUT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC |
| | ENVELOPES AND WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED |
| | IN DIFFERENT COLORS. SITE PLAN(S) CONTAINING THE |
| | ANALYSIS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PART OF THE |
| | TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T1.2, |
| | T-3). ENGINEERING SERVICES CAN PROVIDE SAMPLE AUTOTURN |
| | ANALYSES |
| | 11) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY |
| | ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 |
| | FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH |
| | THE FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC) |
| | TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V - |
| | 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE INSERT THIS ITEM IN THE T-1 OR |
| | T-2 SITE PLAN |
| | 12) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF |
| | THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS, PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND |
| | MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES. PLEASE PROVIDE A NUMBERED |
| | AND SPECIFIC LIST OF POTENTIAL TDMS IN THE TRAFFIC |
| | STUDY |
| | 13) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE |
| | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, |
| | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES |
| | 14) SATISFIED. IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN PLAN, |
| | PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND |
| | PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE NUMBER |
| | OF METERED STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED, |
| | IF ANY |
| | 15) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, |
| | CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE |
| | FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK |
| | 16) SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO, |
| | PROVIDE AN OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. DETAILS OF THE |
| | ANALYSIS SHOULD BE DISCUSSED DURING THE METHODOLOGY |
| | MEETING |
| | 17) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AND PROPERLY MARK A |
| | TURN-AROUND SPACE/STALL AT EACH DEAD-END OF THE GARAGE. |
| | FROM SHEET A2.1 IT IS NOT CLEAR WHERE AND IF THE |
| | LOADING ZONE IS CONNECTED TO THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE |
| | NORTHERN GARAGE. PLEASE CLARIFY, AS A TURN-AROUND SPACE |
| | MAY BE NEEDED AT THAT LOCATION OTHERWISE. SEVERAL |
| | DEAD-ENDS ARE MISSING OR THE TURN-AROUND SPACES ARE NOT |
| | PROPERLY MARKED |
| | 18) IN THE GARAGE PLANS, ALL THE DRIVE AISLES, RAMPS |
| | AND AT LEAST A SET OF PARKING SPACES IN EACH FLOOR |
| | SHOULD BE DIMENSIONED |
| | 19) PER CITY CODE SEC94-111(C)(1): ???IN THOSE CASES |
| | WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO A WALL, |
| | FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION, THE |
| | STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE |
| | FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF |
| | THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A |
| | MINIMUM OF TWO FEET.??? |
| | 20) HOW MANY GARAGE FLOORS ARE THERE? SHEET A2.3 SHOWS |
| | TWO UP-RAMPS FROM THE THIRD FLOOR, IS THERE A FOURTH? |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY OR CORRECT THE TEXT/ARROWS |
| | 21) INSTALL CROSSWALKS ON THE NORTHERN AND EASTERN LEG |
| | OF THE ROSEMARY AND 4TH ST INTERSECTION |
| | 22) SHEET C-8 POINTS AT GATE(S) AT THE EASTERN LEG OF |
| | THE ROSEMARY AND 4TH INTERSECTION. ARE THOSE PEDESTRIAN |
| | AND/OR VEHICULAR GATES? IF SO, THEY MAY NEED TO BE |
| | MOVED FURTHER EAST TO ACCOMMODATE THE PEDESTRIAN |
| | CROSSING |
| | 23) PROVIDE BIKE RACKS WITHIN OR NEARBY THE PUBLIC OPEN |
| | SPACE AREA |
| | 24) PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE |
| | REFER TO CITY CODE 86-246 FOR DETAILS. |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
