Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z22080012
Project Number Z22080012
Review Stop STORM
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2023-02-23 11:39:40THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 2/17/2023 SUBMITTAL:
  
 1. [NOT SATISFIED] THE CITY'S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM
 IS NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988
 AS LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE
 PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM
 CONVERSION TO NGVD1929 ON THE SURVEYS. SEVERAL OF THE
 SURVEYS LIST NAVD1988 AS THE VERTICAL DATUM BUT THERE
 MAY NOT BE ELEVATION DATA ON THE SURVEYS. EVERY SHEET
 WITH ELEVATION INFORMATION SHOULD LIST THE VERTICAL
 DATUM AND THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929.
  
 2. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE SCALE BAR ON THE
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. THE LISTED SCALES (1/8 INCH = 1
 FEET) ON THE FLOOR PLANS (SHEETS A2.2, ETC.) ARE DOUBLE
 THE SCALE OF WHAT IS PRESENTED ON THE DRAWINGS.
  
 3. [SATISFIED] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 4. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING
 UTILITY LINES (SIZE, MATERIAL, TYPE - STORM, SAN., WM,
 ETC.) ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS.
  
 5. [NOT SATISFIED - FENCE SHOULD BE REMOVED] PORTIONS
 OF NORTH AND EAST EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCING IS ON
 PROPERTY NOT OWNED BY THE APPLICANT.
  
 6. [SATISFIED] PORTION OF PROPOSED NORTH DRIVEWAY APRON
 TO W. RAILROAD AVE WILL BE ON PROPERTY NOT OWNED BY
 APPLICANT.
  
 7. [SATISFIED] PORTION OF ROADWAY, SIDEWALK AND
 DRAINAGE SYSTEM IN THE MIDDLE OF THE DEVELOPMENT IS
 LOCATED ON PROPERTY NOT OWNED BY THE APPLICANT.
  
 8. [NOT SATISFIED] PROPOSED SIDEWALK ON ADJACENT
 PROPERTY TO THE NORTH ALONG W. RAILROAD AVE DOES NOT
 ALIGN WITH THE EXISTING SIDEWALK.
  
 9. [NOT SATISFIED - RESPONSE TO COMMENT NOT FOUND]
 SIDEWALK EASEMENT WILL BE NEEDED FOR THE PROPOSED
 SIDEWALK ALONG THE SOUTH AND EAST PROPERTY LINES AND
 POSSIBLY THE SIDEWALK ENCROACHMENT ON THE WEST PROPERTY
 LINE.
  
 10. [SATISFIED] SHOW SIDEWALK CONNECTION AND CURB RAMP
 TO THE CROSSWALK ON 3RD STREET.
  
 11. [NOT SATISFIED] SIDEWALK EAST OF EAST DRIVEWAY TO
 3RD STREET WILL BE ON PROPERTY NOT OWNED BY THE
 APPLICANT NOR DOES THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK ALIGN WITH THE
 EXISTING SIDEWALK.
  
 12. [NOT SATISFIED] DRIVEWAY APRONS WITHIN THE RIGHT OF
 WAY SHOULD BE CONCRETE.
  
 13. [NOT SATISFIED] DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS WILL AFFECT
 EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 14. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FOR THE
 FOLLOWING. SHOW, IF APPLICABLE, RIGHT OF WAY LINE,
 STREET NAME, GRADE BREAKS, SURFACE FEATURES, DIMENSIONS
 FROM RIGHT OF WAY TO BACK OF SIDEWALK, FACE OF
 BUILDING, HIGH POINTS OF DRIVEWAYS, BACK OF CURB, ETC.
 A. ALL DRIVEWAY CONNECTIONS TO THE RIGHT OF WAY.
 SECTION TO EXTEND FROM CENTERLINE OF RIGHT OF WAY TO 5
 FEET BEYOND HIGH POINT OF DRIVEWAY.
 B. NORTH-SOUTH SECTION ON THE 4TH STREET DRIVE
 EXTENSION FROM FACE OF BUILDING TO FACE OF BUILDING.
 C. FROM CENTERLINE OF RIGHT OF WAY TO EACH BUILDING
 FACE.
 D. FROM NORTH FACE OF NORTH BUILDING TO THE EXISTING
 PARKING LOT ON THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH. THE SECTION
 TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE LONGER NORTH PROPERTY LINE.
  
 15. [NOT SATISFIED] DRAW THE OUTLINE OF THE
 EXFILTRATION TRENCH TO THE DESIGN WIDTH (EXFILTRATION
 TRENCH DETAIL SHOWS 8 FEET WIDE TRENCH) ON THE PLANS.
 FOR THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH ALONG W. RAILROAD AVE., THE
 TRENCH WILL BE THE WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK AND EXTEND
 FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO THE BUILDING FACE. FOR
 THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH ALONG THE EXTENSION OF 4TH
 STREET, THE CENTER OF THE PIPE IS LESS THAN 5 FEET FROM
 THE SOUTH BUILDING. BUILDING FOUNDATIONS WILL NEED TO
 BE DESIGNED SO THAT THE SLAB WILL NOT BE UNDERMINED
 WHEN THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH WILL BE REPLACED WHEN IT
 IS NO LONGER FUNCTIONING AS DESIGNED. ANY SLAB OR TREE
 ROOT BARRIER ADJACENT TO THE TRENCH WILL IMPEDE THE
 FLOW OUT THAT SIDE OF THE TRENCH AND SHOULD BE
 ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH EQUATION.
  
 16. [NOT SATISFIED - RESPONSE TO COMMENT NOT FOUND]
 CONSIDER THERE WILL BE PROPER VERTICAL CLEARANCE FOR
 MAINTAINING THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND REPLACING THE
 EXFILTRATION TRENCH SYSTEM WHEN IT IS NO LONGER
 FUNCTIONING AS DESIGNED WITHIN THE ENCLOSED PARKING
 AREAS OF THE BUILDING.
  
 17. [NOT SATISFIED - RESPONSE TO COMMENT NOT FOUND.]
 CONSIDER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN
 LIEU OR IN COMBINATION WITH THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH
 SYSTEM.
  
 18. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - SOME STRUCTURES ARE MISSING
 RIM ELEVATIONS] NUMBER THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR EASE
 OF REFERENCE. NO DESIGN INFORMATION (RIM, INVERT
 ELEVATIONS) IS PROVIDED.
  
 19. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - LABEL WAS REMOVED. ADD THE
 LABEL BACK TO THE PGD PLAN AND POINT TO THE RIGHT
 CONNECTION] THE OUTFALL CONNECTION TO CITY DRAINAGE
 SYSTEM APPEARS TO BE MISLABELED. IT IS SHOWN POINTING
 TO THE FIRST NORTH-SOUTH PIPE SOUTH OF THE 4TH STREET
 EXTENSION AND EAST OF THE BUILDING.
  
 20. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SIGNING AND PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS:
 A. [NOT SHOWN] STOP BAR AND SIGN NEEDED FOR SERVICE
 DRIVE DRIVEWAY AND GARAGE ACCESS DRIVEWAY TO W.
 RAILROAD AVE.
 B. [NOT SHOWN] STOP BAR AND SIGN NEEDED FOR THE TWO
 DRIVEWAYS TO 3RD STREET.
 C. [SATISFIED] DO NOT ENTER AND ONE-WAY SIGNS AT EAST
 END OF 4TH STREET EXTENSION DRIVE.
 D. [NOT SHOWN] ONE WAY SIGN AT WEST END OF 4TH STREET
 EXTENSION DRIVE.
 E. [NOT SHOWN] SHARED BIKE LANE SIGNS FOR N. ROSEMARY.
 F. [REVIEW COLOR OF CENTERLINE STRIPING] PROVIDE
 STRIPING PLAN FOR N. ROSEMARY AVE. IS THE PLAN TO NOT
 RESTORE THE NEIGHBORHOOD MUSICAL THEME PAVEMENT
 STRIPING?
  
 21. [NOT SATISFIED] SHEET C-9 INCLUDES A VEHICULAR AREA
 PAVER DETAIL. PLEASE IDENTIFY WHERE THESE AREAS ARE ON
 THE PGD PLAN.
 NEW COMMENTS (2/17/2023 SUBMITTAL)
  
 22. JUSTIFY THE OUTFALL DIAMETER LARGER THAN 15 INCHES.
  
 23. THE EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE THAT THE OUTFALL
 PIPE CONNECTS INTO MAY NOT BE BIG ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE
 THE NEW PIPE CONNECTION.
  
 24. IF THE PAVEMENT ADJACENT TO AN EXISTING CURB RAMP
 IS MODIFIED IN ANY MANNER (INCLUDING MILL AND
 RESURFACING), THE CURB RAMP IS TO BE RECONSTRUCTED TO
 MEET CURRENT ADA CRITERIA IF THE RAMP DOES NOT MEET ADA
 CRITERIA.
  
 25. ALL ONSITE DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE SHALL NOT
 ENCROACH INTO THE RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 CONDITIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL
 A. LIST VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCE AND CONVERSION
 EQUATION TO NGVD1929 ON ALL SHEETS WITH ELEVATION
 INFORMATION.
  
 B. SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING UTILITY LINES (SIZE,
 MATERIAL, TYPE ? STORM, SAN., WM, ETC.) ON THE
 ENGINEERING PLANS.
  
 C. SHOW THE PROPOSED SIDEWALKS BEHIND A LANDSCAPE STRIP
 TRANSITIONING TO THE EXISTING SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO THE
 CURB AT ALL PROPERTY LINES.
  
 D. DRIVEWAY APRONS WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY TO BE
 CONCRETE PER CITY DETAILS GC-5 AND GC-6.
  
 E. CALLOUT MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING DRAINAGE
 STRUCTURES THAT WILL BE IMPACTED BY THE DEVELOPMENT.
 VALLEY GUTTER MAY BE NEEDED ACROSS DRIVEWAY CONNECTIONS
 TO THE STREET.
  
 F. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS PER COMMENT #14 ABOVE.
 SIDEWALK AREA ACROSS DRIVEWAY APRONS TO BE MEET WIDTH
 AND ADA CRITERIA.
  
 G. COORDINATE LANDSCAPING AND STORMWATER SYSTEM DESIGN.
 THE PROPOSED WIDTH OF THE AXFILTRATION TRENCHES WILL
 TAKE UP MOST IF NOT ALL OF THE PLANTING AREA WHERE SOME
 OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES ARE LOCATED.
  
 H. EXFILTRATION TRENCHES LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING OR
 UNDERNEATH BUILDING SUFFICIENT VERTICAL CLEARANCE FOR
 MAINTENANCE VEHICLES TO CLEAN THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND
 FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT TO REPLACE THE EXFILTRATION
 TRENCHES WHEN THEY DO NOT FUNCTION AS DESIGNED.
  
 I. PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE TO BE IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH MUTCD. LABEL ALL PROPOSED MARKINGS AND SIGNS.
  
 J. SHOULD THE 4TH STREET EXTENSION EASEMENT BECOME
 PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
 DRAINAGE SYSTEM WITHIN THE R/W SHALL BECOME THE
 RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER.
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved