| Date |
Text |
| 2022-09-07 13:38:32 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 09.07.2022 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z22070043 |
| | CASE NO.: PB 1887A |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. PURSUANT TO THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION, THE FOLLOW |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED: |
| | |
| | 1.1. ONE (1) COPY OF THE MAP PROVIDED BY THE PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER?S OFFICE SHOWING THOSE |
| | PROPERTIES WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY |
| | LINE. |
| | |
| | 1.2. THE AFFIDAVIT ON PAGE 12 OF THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION SHALL BE SIGNED BY THE INDIVIDUAL WHO |
| | OBTAINED THE INFORMATION FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | PROPERTY APPRAISER?S MAPPING OFFICE. |
| | |
| | 2. REVISED LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 3. REVISED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | ACCORDING TO THE SITE PLAN, MODIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN |
| | MADE TO AT LEAST THE GROUND FLOOR LEVEL. ADDITIONALLY, |
| | DESPITE REVISIONS TO THE FLOOR PLANS, PLEASE CONFIRM |
| | THAT THE DATA TABLE IS CORRECT IN THAT THERE ARE NO |
| | MODIFICATIONS TO THE GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE, PERVIOUS, |
| | IMPERVIOUS, ETC. |
| | |
| | 4. SHEET SP-2 OF THE SITE PLAN SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 5. THERE ARE NUMEROUS MISTAKES THROUGHOUT THE |
| | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. |
| | |
| | 6. PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT IS BEING SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN |
| | IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 7. UPDATED UTILITY LETTER (EASEMENT CONSENT) FROM FPL |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED AS IT APPEARS THAT ADDITIONAL |
| | EASEMENTS ARE BEING GRANTED AND LANDSCAPING, WALLS, |
| | ETC. ARE PROPOSED WITHIN. |
| | |
| | 8. JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT NEEDS TO PROVIDE RESPONSES |
| | TO THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT STANDARDS IN SEC. |
| | 94-36(E)(5), AS WELL AS THE AMENDMENT STANDARDS IN SEC. |
| | 94-32 OF THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 9. SITE PLAN NEEDS TO SHOW AND DIMENSION THE SETBACK TO |
| | THE FA?ADE OF THE BUILDING, AS WELL AS SHOW AND |
| | DIMENSION ALL ENCROACHMENTS INTO THE SETBACK |
| | (BALCONIES, ETC.). |
| | |
| | 10. IT APPEARS THAT WITH THE TOWNHOUSE PATIOS, THE REAR |
| | LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS NOT BEING PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | 11. WITH THE REMOVAL OF THE STAGING ENCLOSURE FOR THE |
| | DUMPSTER ROLL-OUT, PLEASE EXPLAIN THE NEW PROCEDURE |
| | THAT IS PROPOSED. APPROVAL FROM THE CITY?S PUBLIC WORKS |
| | DEPARTMENT WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 12. ADDITIONAL DETAIL IS NEEDED REGARDING THE VARIOUS |
| | WALLS, ETC. AROUND THE TOWNHOUSE PATIOS. PURSUANT TO |
| | THE CITY?S ZLDRS, FENCES/WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 6 FEET |
| | IN HEIGHT WHEN LOCATED IN A SIDE/REAR SETBACK. |
| | |
| | 13. THE BIKE RACK THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED AT THE |
| | ENTRANCE TO THE BUILDING APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN REMOVED |
| | FROM THE PLAN. THERE IS A LABEL SHOWN ON THE REVISED |
| | PLAN ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE, BUT IT ISN?T |
| | POINTING TO ANYTHING. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF |
| | THE BIKE RACK. |
| | |
| | 14. PLEASE INDICATE THE NUMBER OF BIKE SPACES THAT ARE |
| | PROPOSED IN THE BIKE STORAGE FACILITY. |
| | |
| | 15. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE GENERATOR ACCESS THAT IS SHOWN |
| | ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. IS THE GENERATOR |
| | INSIDE THE BUILDING? |
| | |
| | 16. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL REGARDING THE POOL EQUIPMENT |
| | LOCATION. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT CAN ONLY ENCROACH 4 FEET |
| | INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK AND NEED TO BE SCREENED. |
| | |
| | 17. DETAILS WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED REGARDING THE |
| | ARTIFICIAL TURF, INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. 94-451 |
| | OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS. NOTE THAT ARTIFICIAL TURF CANNOT |
| | BE LOCATED WITHIN ANY REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFERS AND |
| | SHALL BE TREATED AS IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA. |
| | |
| | 18. ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE THERE IS A LABEL |
| | INDICATING THE ADJACENT BUILDING, BUT NO BUILDING |
| | FOOTPRINTS ARE SHOWN. THE PREVIOUS SITE PLAN INCLUDED |
| | ADJACENT BUILDINGS, AS WELL AS ROADWAY CONDITIONS ON |
| | THE WEST SIDE OF NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE, ETC. ALL OF THESE |
| | ELEMENTS NEED TO BE INCLUDED ON THE REVISED SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 19. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION AND NUMBER EACH OF THE |
| | BOAT SLIPS. |
| | |
| | 20. PLEASE CLARIFY WHY THE DEP PERMIT SHOWS THE ENTIRE |
| | LENGTH OF THE DOCK REMAINING INSIDE THE PROPERTY LINES, |
| | WHILE THE SITE PLAN SHOWS SEVERAL FEET OF THE DOCK |
| | EXTENDING EAST OF THE EASTERN-MOST PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | 21. DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE PROVIDED INDICATING THAT |
| | MARINE GRASSES, ETHNIC COMMUNITIES, AQUATIC PRESERVES, |
| | MANATEE SANCTUARIES, AND IMPORTANT ESTUARINE OR |
| | ECOLOGICAL FEATURES ARE NOT BEING AFFECTED |
| | SIGNIFICANTLY BY THE PROPOSED DOCK CONSTRUCTION. DOCKS |
| | SHALL NOT CONSTRICT WATER CIRCULATION IN LAKE WORTH. |
| | |
| | 22. PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE PLANS THAT THE DOCK |
| | WILL BE SUPPLIES WITH SANITARY PUMP OUT FACILITIES (2 |
| | RECEPTACLES ARE REQUIRED) AS WELL AS POTABLE WATER AND |
| | ELECTRICAL SERVICE. |
| | |
| | 23. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES THAT THE |
| | WAIVER REQUEST FOR THE LENGTH OF THE DOCK IS SO THAT |
| | CAN EXTEND TO THE EASTERN LIMITS OF THE SUBMERGED LAND; |
| | HOWEVER, THE SITE PLAN IS SHOWING THE DOCK EXTENDING |
| | BEYOND THE SUBMERGED LAND. |
| | |
| | 24. PLEASE CLARIFY THE ?SECURITY? PORTION OF THE |
| | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IS |
| | UNCLEAR. |
| | |
| | 25. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRICS FOR THE LIGHTING |
| | PROPOSED. PURSUANT TO THE ZLDRS, LIGHTING ON THE DOCK |
| | SHALL NOT LIGHT SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL REVISED PLANS AND/OR |
| | DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | F) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT |
| | DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE |
| | COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | TTY: 800.955.8771 |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
