| Date |
Text |
| 2023-05-07 15:47:08 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE |
| | 3/28/2023 SUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | 1. [NOT SATISFIED - DESPITE WHAT THE RESPONSE LETTER |
| | STATED, A REVISED SURVEY WAS NOT SUBMITTED.] THE CITY'S |
| | OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS |
| | ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS LONG AS THE CONVERSION |
| | EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE PROJECT LOCATION IS |
| | PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE VERTICAL DATUM CONVERSION TO |
| | NGVD1929 ON THE SURVEY. |
| | |
| | 2.[NOT SATISFIED - DESPITE WHAT THE RESPONSE LETTER |
| | STATED, NO CROSS SECTIONS WERE PROVIDED ON THE UPDATED |
| | CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN.] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM |
| | CENTERLINE OF RIGHTS OF WAY AND WEST PROPERTY LINE TO |
| | THE BUILDING FACES. SHOW AND LABEL SURFACE FEATURES, |
| | GRADE BREAKS, GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES, FINISHED FLOOR |
| | ELEVATION, RIGHT OF WAY LINES WITH THE STREET |
| | IDENTIFIED, DIMENSIONS FROM RIGHT OF WAY TO SURFACE |
| | FEATURES. NOTE THERE IS OVER A FOOT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN |
| | THE PROPOSED FFE AND THE EXISTING GRADES ON 10TH ST. |
| | |
| | 3. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - TREES PROPOSED OVER SANITARY |
| | SEWER LATERAL AND STAFF SUGGESTS INSTALLING ROOT |
| | BARRIERS TO PROTECT THE STORM PIPES FROM OTHER PROPOSED |
| | TREES.] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND |
| | COORDINATE PLANTINGS WITH THE UTILITIES. |
| | |
| | 4. [SATISFIED - DESPITE THAT THE RESPONSE LETTER STATED |
| | THAT THE PARKING SPACES WERE REDUCED IN LENGTH TO |
| | INCLUDE OVERHANG OF THE RAISED CURB AND HARDSCAPE |
| | AREAS, THE PARKING SPACES ARE DIMENSIONED TO BE 18 FEET |
| | DEEP TO THE FACE OF CURB.] CONSIDER REDUCING THE |
| | PARKING SPACE DEPTHS FROM 18.5 FEET TO 18 FEET |
| | (INCLUDING THE 2 FEET OF OVERHANG). |
| | |
| | 5. [SATISFIED] SOUTH DRIVEWAY ENCROACHING ONTO ADJACENT |
| | PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 6. [NOT SATISFIED - NO HATCHING SHOWN TO SHOW CONCRETE |
| | MATERIAL.] DRIVEWAY APRON WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY |
| | SHOULD BE CONCRETE. |
| | |
| | 7. [NOT SATISFIED - CURBING TYPE NOT CALLED OUT ON THE |
| | ENGINEERING PLAN.] INSTALL TYPE F CURB AND GUTTER ALONG |
| | THE FRONTAGE OF 10TH STREET. |
| | |
| | 8. [SATISFIED] REMOVE CONCRETE WALKWAY BETWEEN CURB AND |
| | SIDEWALK ON 10TH STREET. |
| | |
| | 9. [NOT SATISFIED] LABEL PROPOSED SIDEWALKS, CURB |
| | TYPES, ETC. ON- AND OFF-SITE THAT WILL INCLUDED WITH |
| | THIS PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 10. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - INCLUDE HATCH PATTERNS OF |
| | LANDSCAPE AREAS AND OF THE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE NORTH |
| | AND EAST SIDES OF THE BUILDING] ON ENGINEERING PLANS, |
| | INCLUDE ALL HATCHING PATTERNS IN THE SHEET LEGEND. THE |
| | LEGEND INCLUDES PROPOSED TRUEGRID. IDENTIFY WHERE THIS |
| | WILL BE INSTALLED AND PROVIDE DETAILS FOR IT. |
| | |
| | 11. [SATISFIED] STOP BAR AND SIGN WILL BE NEEDED. |
| | |
| | 12. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE EXISTING SPOT GRADES FOR |
| | THE ALLEY. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS (3/28.2023 UBMITTAL): |
| | |
| | 13. EXPLAIN FLARE LINE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE SOUTH |
| | DRIVEWAY TO THE PROPOSED SPOT GRADE 14.70 FT NAVD. |
| | |
| | 14. ADJUST SPOT GRADE LEADERS TO WHERE THE GRADES ARE |
| | TO BE SHOWN. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE IS A PROPOSED SPOT |
| | GRADE THE SAME AS THE GRATE ELEVATION OF S-205 BUT |
| | POINTING TO THE PAVEMENT 2 FEET EAST OF THE STRUCTURE. |
| | ANOTHER EXAMPLE, THERE IS A PROPOSED SPOT GRADE OF |
| | 16.20 FT NAVD POINTING TO THE SOUTH WALL OF THE |
| | BUILDING. OTHER PROPOSED SPOT GRADES IN THE PARKING |
| | SPACES ARE SHOWN 1.5 FEET FROM THE CURB. |
| | |
| | 15. WHEEL STOPS WILL BE NEEDED IN THE PARKING SPACES TO |
| | PREVENT VEHICLES FROM PARKING OVER THE SIDEWALK. |
| | |
| | 16. EXTEND THE HANDICAP PARKING ACCESS AISLE STRIPING |
| | ALL THE WAY TO THE END OF THE ACCESS AISLE. FBC SECTION |
| | 502.4 PROHIBITS CURB RAMPS WITHIN THE HANDICAP PARKING |
| | ACCESS AISLE. |
| | |
| | 17. COORDINATE THE OUTFALL PIPE FROM STRUCTURE S-201 |
| | WITH THE NORTH RAILROAD STREETSCAPE PLANS, INCLUDING |
| | THE LOCATION OF THE PIPE OPENING AT THE EXISTING |
| | STRUCTURE S-101 THAT THE OUTFALL PIPE CONNECTS TO. |
| | |
| | 18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS OF OTHER OFFSITE UTILITIES |
| | WITH THE NORTH RAILROAD STREETSCAPE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 19. PROVIDE SAFE SEPARATION BETWEEN STOP BAR AND BACK |
| | OF SIDEWALK. |
| | |
| | 20. PAVEMENT HATCHING FOR SOUTH DRIVEWAY APPEARS TO |
| | HIDE CURBING ALONG THE DRIVEWAY FLARES. |
| | |
| | 21. ENGINEERING PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN WITH |
| | REGARDS TO THE RECESSED DOOR OPENINGS. |
| | |
| | 22. PROVIDE DETAIL OF THE CONTROL STRUCTURE. NOTE THE |
| | CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF BLEEDERS WITH |
| | EXFILTRATION TRENCH SYSTEMS. |
| | |
| | |
| | TRACY WARD, PE |
| | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | 561-494-1120 (O) |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
