| Date |
Text |
| 2023-05-01 16:21:20 | 1. SETBACKS |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE SETBACK LINES ON ALL SITE PLAN AND |
| | ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS |
| | SETBACKS NEED TO BE RECALCULATED AND LABELED: |
| | - 7TH STREET IS FRONT, PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN ON THIS |
| | FRONTAGE REQUIRES 16??? SETBACK |
| | - NORTH RAILROAD AVENUE IS SIDE STREET, PRIMARY |
| | PEDESTRIAN REQUIRES 16??? SETBACK |
| | - REAR IS ALLEY, REQUIRES 5??? SETBACK |
| | - SIDE INTERIOR IS EAST PROPERTY LINE, REQUIRES 0? OR |
| | NFPA |
| | RESPONSE: PER A MEETING WITH STAFF THE SETBACKS ARE |
| | ALIGNED WITH THE APPLICANTS SITE PLAN PROGRAMMING WITH |
| | N. RAILROAD AS A FRONT SETBACK (0???); 7TH STREET AS A |
| | FRONT SETBACK (16???); ALLEY AT NORTH BOUNDARY AS SIDE |
| | INTERIOR (5??? 0??? PROVIDED EXISTING CONDITION); AND, |
| | EAST BOUNDARY AS REAR SETBACK (5??? FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL |
| | / 5??? PROPOSED FOR ADDITION). |
| | 1. ZONING REVIEW 5.1.23 ??? [NOT SATISFIED] |
| | DISCUSSION WAS REGARDING THE BPD-R SETBACKS WHICH HAVE |
| | A PROVISION SPECIFICALLY CALLING OUT RAILROAD AVE. |
| | SETBACKS. THE BPD-5 SUBDISTRICT DOES NOT CALL OUT |
| | RAILROAD AVE., HOWEVER BECAUSE THIS PROPERTY IS NOT IN |
| | A RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT THE SETBACKS ARE CALCULATED |
| | FROM BACK OF CURB, NOT PROPERTY LINE. |
| | SETBACKS STILL APPEAR TO BE MET, JUST NEED TO BE |
| | PROPERLY LABELED. |
| | RAILROAD AVE. IS A PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN STREET THEREFORE |
| | 16??? IS REQUIRED ON THIS FRONTAGE (FROM CURB) |
| | 7TH STREET IS A PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN SETBACK REQUIRES |
| | 16??? SETBACK (FROM CURB) |
| | ALLEY IS CONSIDERED REAR AND WOULD REQUIRE 5??? |
| | (EXISTING STRUCTURE WOULD BE CONSIDERED LEGAL |
| | NONCONFORMITY) |
| | SIDE INTERIOR IS EASTERN PROPERTY LINE, REQUIRES 0??? |
| | OR NFPA. |
| | |
| | 2. LANDSCAPING |
| | - 12% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT. HOW IS THIS BEING |
| | MET? PLEASE PROVIDE OPEN SPACE TYPE AND HOW IT MEETS |
| | THE STANDARDS OF THAT TYPE. SEE. TABLE IV-6 AND TABLE |
| | IV-7. |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPING DETAILS FOR N |
| | RAILROAD AVE. AND 7TH ST. FRONTAGES. |
| | RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. SEE SITE ANALYSIS EXHIBIT |
| | PROVIDED HEREIN. |
| | 2. ZONING REVIEW 5.1.23 ??? [NOT SATISFIED] |
| | PER SEC. 94-109 ??? OPEN SPACE, PRIVATE; IF PRIVATE |
| | OPEN SPACE IS LOCATED ON THE GROUND FLOOR AND LOCATED |
| | ALONG THE LOT FRONTAGE, IT SHALL BE DESIGNED IN |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS, AND |
| | IT SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE BY THE PUBLIC FOR PUBLIC USE. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE CLARIFICATION AND IDENTIFY ON SITE PLAN |
| | & LP-1 WHAT TYPOLOGY OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IS BEING |
| | PROVIDED PER SEC. 94-109 TABLE IV-6 AND TABLE IV-7 |
| | (I.E. PASSAGEWAY, GARDEN PLAZA, AND GARDEN COURTYARD); |
| | PLEASE BE SURE TO MEET THE STANDARDS OF TABLE IV-7 FOR |
| | THE SELECTED CLASSIFICATION. PLEASE REVISE SITE |
| | ANALYSIS EXHIBITS SHEET AND LP-1 ACCORDINGLY. |
| | MAX OVERHEAD COVER IS A PERCENTAGE; USUALLY 20% PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY HOW MUCH OF THIS SPACE IS BEING COVERED BY |
| | ROOFS OR OVERHEAD STRUCTURES. |
| | |
| | 3. TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENTS - PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | TRANSPARENCY CALCULATIONS; 50% ON N RAILROAD AND 50% ON |
| | 7TH |
| | RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. SEE SITE ANALYSIS EXHIBIT |
| | PROVIDED HEREIN. |
| | 3. ZONING REVIEW 5.1.23 ??? [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] |
| | TRANSPARENCY CALCULATIONS APPEAR TO BE MET, PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE MARKUP OF FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION THAT DIMENSIONS |
| | THE BUILDING FRONTAGE AND FENESTRATION/TRANSPARENCY |
| | (PLEASE REFERENCE SEC. 94-109 FIGURE IV-33) ONLY THE |
| | ACTIVE USES AND FIRST 10FT. OF HEIGHT FROM SIDEWALK |
| | ELEVATION NEEDS TO BE CALCULATED. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4. SITE PLAN MENTIONS PARKING REQUIREMENTS BEING MET |
| | WITH VALET SERVICE OFFSITE, PLEASE INDICATE WHERE THE |
| | OFF-SITE PARKING IS LOCATED. - IS ALL OF THE PARKING |
| | UNDER A VALET SERVICE? |
| | RESPONSE: PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE CENTRAL |
| | PARKING LOT; ON-STREET AND WITHIN THE TEMPORARY PARKING |
| | LOT LOCATED AT THE NORTH END OF THE PROJECT. EACH |
| | TENANT OR BUILDING WILL COORDINATE VALET PARKING |
| | SERVICES FOR THEIR RESPECTIVE CUSTOMERS. |
| | 4. ZONING REVIEW 5.1.23 ??? [SATISFIED] OFFSITE PARKING |
| | TO GO BEFORE DAC |
| | |
| | 5. WHERE IS THE GARBAGE ENCLOSURE LOCATED? DETAIL IS |
| | SHOWN ON SITE PLAN, BUT NO LOCATION INDICATED. PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY LOCATION AND OPERATION. |
| | RESPONSE: THE DUMPSTER DETAIL HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM |
| | THE PLAN. A TRASH ROOM THAT WILL ACCOMMODATE GARBAGE; |
| | RECYCLING AND BULK PICK UP ITEMS HAD BEEN FURNISHED AT |
| | THE NORTH END OF THE BUILDING ACCESSING THE ALLEY. |
| | 5. ZONING REVIEW 5.1.23 ??? [SATISFIED] ARE THE CANS TO |
| | BE ROLLED OUT TO THE ALLEY? BE SURE SANITATION IS OKAY |
| | WITH PROPOSAL. |
| | |
| | 6. WHERE IS THE LOADING OPERATION LOCATED? DETAIL IS |
| | SHOWN ON SITE PLAN, BUT NO LOCATION INDICATED. PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY LOCATION AND OPERATION. |
| | RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. THE SITE WILL BE ACCESSED FROM |
| | THE PUBLIC ALLEY FOR LOADING/UNLOADING AND TRASH |
| | REMOVAL. SEE UPDATED SITE PLAN INDICATING THE LOCATION |
| | OF THE SERVICE AREA OF THE BUILDING AND TRASH ROOM |
| | ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 6. ZONING REVIEW 5.1.23 ??? [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | 7. PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS SHOWS SOUTHEASTERN CORNER OF |
| | PROPERTY ALONG 7TH STREET WITH AREAS BELOW REQUIRED 0.6 |
| | FOOTCANDLES. |
| | RESPONSE: SEE UPDATED PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FOR |
| | MODIFICATIONS TO THE AREAS OF THE PLAN NOT IN |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE 0.6 FOOTCANDLE REQUIREMENT. |
| | 7. ZONING REVIEW 5.1.23 ??? [NOT SATISFIED] |
| | PHOTOMETRICS STILL SHOW AREAS AT 0.5 AT SOUTHEAST END |
| | OF PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 8. PLEASE INDICATE WHERE REQUIRED BIKE PARKING SPACES |
| | ARE LOCATED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: BICYCLE PARKING EXISTS WITHIN THE R-O-W (UP |
| | TO THREE BIKE RACKS ARE PROVIDED) IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO |
| | THE PUBLIC ENTRANCE TO THE SITE. SEE UPDATED SITE PLAN |
| | AND ASSOCIATED STREETSCAPE PLAN. |
| | 8. ZONING REVIEW 5.1.23 ??? [SATISFIED] BIKE PARKING |
| | FACILITATED IN ROW; REQUIREMENT FOR THE TABLE IS 1 |
| | SPACE FOR EVERY 100??? OF FRONTAGE; THEREFORE 2 SPACES |
| | REQUIRED. THOSE ARE IN ROW. |
| | |
| | 9. RENDERING SHOWS NORA NEIGHBORHOOD SIGNAGE ONSITE, |
| | PLEASE NOTE ANY SIGNAGE WILL BE UNDER A SEPARATE |
| | PERMIT. |
| | RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED |
| | 9. ZONING REVIEW 5.1.23 ??? [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | |
| | NEW ZONING COMMENTS 5.1.23: |
| | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE PROJECTION DETAILS OR DIMENSIONS FOR |
| | THE CANOPY ELEMENTS SHOWN ON THE ELEVATIONS. BE SURE |
| | THAT THESE ELEMENTS MEET THE STANDARDS IN SEC. 94-109 |
| | TABLE IV-5. ELEVATIONS PROVIDED, PLEASE SHOW |
| | PROJECTIONS. |
| | |
| | 2. ANY ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED |
| | FROM VIEW. PER SEC. 94-109 PROJECTION, VERTICAL: |
| | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND APPURTENANCES NECESSARY TO THE |
| | OPERATION OR MAINTENANCE OF THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE |
| | ITSELF SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COOLING TOWERS, |
| | ELEVATORS, STAIRS AND MECHANICAL PENTHOUSES, VENT |
| | STACKS AND ANTENNAS SHALL BE ENCLOSED AND SCREENED IN |
| | SUCH A MANNER THAT THE ENCLOSURE IS DESIGNED AS AN |
| | INTEGRAL PART OF THE OVERALL BUILDING DESIGN. |
| | |
| | 3. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ON THE GROUND CAN ENCROACH INTO |
| | SETBACKS A MAXIMUM OF 4FT MUST LEAVE AT LEAST 1FT. BE |
| | SURE THAT THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MEETS THIS |
| | ENCROACHMENT STANDARD. |
| | |
| | |
| | CHRIS KIMMERLY, AICP |
| | URBAN DESIGN PLANNER |
| | 822.1426 [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
