Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z22070019
Project Number Z22070019
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 1
Notes
Date Text
2022-08-11 11:24:58PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 08.11.2022
 PROJECT NO.: Z22070019
 CASE NO.: ISPR 22-06
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. NUMEROUS AMOUNTS OF INFORMATION IS MISSING FROM THE
 SITE DATA TABLE. PLEASE REFER TO THE SITE PLAN
 CHECKLIST CONTAINED WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 2. THE SQUARE FOOTAGES OF THE RETAIL USE DIFFER BETWEEN
 THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, THE PROJECT FACT SHEET,
 THE COUNTY?S TPS LETTER, ETC. ALL PLANS/DOCUMENTS SHALL
 BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CORRECT INFORMATION.
  
 3. PURSUANT TO COMMENTS BY JUSTIN STROH, PLANNING
 SPECIALIST II WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
 TRANSPORTATION (FDOT), A PRE-APPLICATION MEETING IS
 NECESSARY BEFORE THE APPLICANT CAN APPLY FOR A PERMIT
 FROM THE DEPARTMENT FOR ACCESS TO BROADWAY AVENUE
 (US-1). THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONTACT FDOT TO REQUEST AN
 ACCESS PRE-APPLICATION MEETING TO COORDINATE THE
 PROPOSED CONNECTIONS. CONTACT INFORMATION WILL BE
 PROVIDED BY EMAIL.
  
 4. WHY WAS THERE A SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY
 DETERMINATION (SCAD) ISSUED FOR A FUTURE LAND USE MAP
 AMENDMENT AND REZONING? THE SCAD SHOULD HAVE ONLY BEEN
 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER APPROVAL. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 REVISED/CORRECTED SCAD APPROVAL.
  
 5. THE OWNER?S CONSENT FORM IS INCOMPLETE AND DOES NOT
 PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE OWNER, THE AGENT/APPLICANT,
 ETC. PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETE AND ACCURATE OWNER?S
 CONSENT FORM.
  
 6. THE DOCUMENT FROM FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES (GAS) IS
 A DEMOLITION CLEARANCE. A LETTER FROM FPU IS TO BE
 PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DOES
 NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENT OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE
 WITH THEIR PROVISION OF SERVICES.
  
 7. A CONFIRMATION LETTER SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM AT&T
 INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT
 ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENT OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE
 WITH THEIR PROVISION OF SERVICES.
  
 8. YOUR LANDSCAPE PLANS APPEAR TO SHOW TREES WITH
 GRATES, ETC. ALONG BOTH STREET FRONTAGES, BUT THIS IS
 NOT DEPICTED ON THE CIVIL PLANS.
  
 9. THE SIDEWALK ALONG BROADWAY NEEDS TO BE A MINIMUM OF
 8 FEET CLEAR (NO OBSTRUCTIONS). THE ?FRONTAGE LINE?
 (NOT PROPERTY LINE) FOR THE PURPOSE OF MEASURING THE
 BUILDING SETBACK SHIFTS TO THE EDGE OF THE SIDEWALK. 65
 PERCENT OF THE BUILDING NEEDS TO BE WITHIN 5 FEET OF
 THIS ADJUSTED FRONTAGE LINE. PLEASE DEPICT ACCORDINGLY
 ON THE SITE PLAN.
  
 10. ALONG THE FRONTAGE, WHERE THERE IS NO BUILDING, A
 STREETWALL SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT IS 34-72 INCHES IN
 HEIGHT.
  
 11. THE REQUIRED REAR SETBACK (ALONG WEST PROPERTY
 LINE) IS 15 FEET.
  
 12. PLEASE CLARIFY THE EASEMENT LINE THAT IS SHOWN ON
 THE SITE PLAN ALONG BROADWAY AVENUE.
  
 13. PROVIDE THE DIMENSION FROM THE BUILDING TO THE
 CENTERLINE OF THE ADJACENT STREETS (BROADWAY ? 40 FOOT
 MINIMUM).
  
 14. WALLS SHALL BE LIMITED TO 2 MATERIALS.
  
 15. STOREFRONTS ARE REQUIRED ALONG BOTH STREET
 FRONTAGES AND SHALL HAVE GLAZING ALONG A MINIMUM OF 70
 PERCENT OF THE FA?ADE LENGTH BETWEEN 2 AND 8 FEET FROM
 THE GROUND. PLANS SHALL INDICATE SUCH DIMENSIONS, AND
 THE 51ST STREET FRONTAGE DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY
 STOREFRONT.
  
 16. THE DIRECTIONS INDICATED ON THE ELEVATIONS ARE
 INCORRECT (NORTH VS. SOUTH ? EAST VS. WEST).
  
 17. STORIES ABOVE THE FIRST FLOOR SHALL HAVE CLEAR
 GLAZED AREA AND OPENINGS BETWEEN 25 PERCENT AND 45
 PERCENT OF THE FACADE AREA. PLEASE PROVIDE SUCH
 CALCULATIONS.
  
 18. WINDOWS, EXCEPT STOREFRONTS, SHALL BE OPERABLE.
  
 19. WINDOWS SHALL BE RECESSED A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES,
 PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL.
  
 20. THE ELEVATION APPEARS TO SHOW AN OVERHEAD DOOR.
 THIS PRESENTS MULTIPLE CONCERNS WITH HOW THE PARKING IS
 ACCESSED, STACKING IN THE STREET, ETC.
  
 21. PLEASE CLARIFY THE FA?ADE TREATMENT ON THE GROUND
 FLOOR ALONG 51ST STREET WHERE THE PARKING IS LOCATED?
 THE PARKING NEEDS TO BE CONCEALED WITH A STREETWALL.
  
 22. THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT CLEARLY INDICATE THE
 OVERHANG PROJECTION ON THE FIRST FLOOR.
  
 23. MULTIPLE PLANS SHOW MULTIPLE PORTIONS OF THE
 BUILDING, OVERHANGS, ETC. EXTENDING OUTSIDE OF THE
 PROPERTY LINE. ALL BUILDINGS AND ASSOCIATED
 IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINE AND MEET
 THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS.
  
 24. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE TRASH BEING ROLLED OUT INTO
 A LANDSCAPE AREA/STREET.
  
 25. A MINIMUM OF 18 PARKING SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED,
 ONLY 16 ARE SHOWN.
  
 26. THE DRIVE AISLE IN THE PARKING AREA SHALL BE A
 MINIMUM OF 24 FEET WIDE.
  
 27. A TURN-AROUND SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE
 DEAD-END OF THE DRIVE AISLE.
  
 28. PARKING STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 29. AT LEAST 1 LOADING SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED (10 FEET
 X 25 FEET).
  
 30. BIKE RACKS SHALL BE PROVIDED (1 PER 20 PARKING
 SPACES). THE LOCATION SHALL BE INDICATED AND A DETAIL
 SHALL BE INCLUDED SHOWING THE TYPE OF RACK, THE
 DIMENSIONAL CLEARANCE TO SURROUNDING OBSTRUCTIONS, ETC.
  
 31. THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE SHOWS COLUMNS IN THE
 SPACE. THE SPACE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 12 FEET IN CLEAR
 WIDTH AND SHALL HAVE AN ADJACENT AISLE OF AT LEAST 5
 FEET IN CLEAR WIDTH.
  
 32. WHEEL STOPS SHALL BE 2 FEET FROM THE FRONT OF THE
 PARKING SPACE.
  
 33. THERE ARE NUMEROUS CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE LANDSCAPE
 PLANS AND THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF THE BUILDING,
 SPECIFICALLY THE OVERHANGS/PROJECTIONS AND THE PLANTING
 OF TREES, ETC.
  
 34. NO PORTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL EXTEND INTO THE
 VISIBILITY TRIANGLE BETWEEN A HEIGHT OF 18 INCHES AND 8
 FEET.
  
 35. PLEASE CLARIFY THE BUILDING SECTION LABELING THE
 ROOF DECK AS THE TERRACE LEVEL; IS THERE ACCESS TO THE
 ROOF (OTHER THAN MAINTENANCE)?
  
 36. PLEASE SHOW ON THE BUILDING SECTION/ELEVATIONS THE
 LOCATION AND SIZE OF THE ROOF-TOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
 TO SHOW THAT IT WILL BE COMPLETELY SCREENED FROM VIEW
 BY THE PROPOSED PARAPET.
  
 37. THE ELEVATIONS INDICATE A FENCE ALONG THE ADJACENT
 PROPERTY WEST AND SOUTH PROPERTY LINES, BUT THIS IS NOT
 SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. SUCH FENCING SHALL BE
 DIMENSIONED. ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE THERE SHALL
 BE A 72-INCH HIGH WALL (NOT FENCE).
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved