| Date |
Text |
| 2022-08-10 23:48:38 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS |
| | 1) PROVIDE FDOT ACCESS MANAGEMENT LETTER |
| | 2) PROVIDE COUNTY APPROVAL LETTER |
| | |
| | SITE COMMENTS |
| | 3) PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC SPECIFIC SET OF |
| | SITE PLANS, WITH EACH TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES |
| | (E.G. ROADWAY, DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, |
| | SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, SIGNS, PAVEMENT |
| | MARKINGS, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED |
| | THROUGHOUT THE CORRIDOR. THE CIVIL HORIZONTAL CONTROL |
| | PLANS, C4.00-4.03, ARE A STARTING POINT |
| | 4) IN THE SITE PLANS, BOTH SIDES OF EACH ROAD IMPACTED |
| | BY THE PROJECT, WITH CORRESPONDING TRANSPORTATION |
| | FEATURES SHOULD BE SHOWN |
| | 5) PROVIDE A NARRATIVE AND TABLES SUMMARIZING EXISTING |
| | CONDITIONS AND PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS FOR EACH BLOCK |
| | (I.E. NUMBER OF NEW OR REMOVED PARKING STALLS; |
| | MODIFICATIONS TO SIDEWALK, LANDSCAPE AND DRIVEWAY |
| | AREAS) |
| | 6) IF ANY OF THE EXISTING DRIVEWAYS ARE MODIFIED AS |
| | PART OF THE PROJECT, PLEASE PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS |
| | FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING |
| | IN/OUT OF THEM, WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND |
| | WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED. ANALYSIS |
| | SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE |
| | ANALYSIS |
| | 7) IDEALLY, TEN FEET WIDE SIDEWALKS SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | THROUGHOUT THE CORRIDOR, UNLESS PRECLUDED BY EXISTING |
| | ROAD OR BUILDING PHYSICAL CONSTRAINTS. IT IS NOT |
| | ACCEPTABLE THAT PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREAS ARE AT TIMES |
| | WIDER OR LARGER THAN ADJACENT PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES |
| | 8) PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS ALONG OKEECHOBEE |
| | BLVD DO NOT SEEM COMPLIANT WITH FDOT CORNER CLEARANCE |
| | AND INTERSECTION MINIMUM DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE |
| | REVISE AND PROPERLY SHOWCASE DIMENSIONS AND DISTANCES |
| | 9) WHEN POSSIBLE, DRIVEWAY CROSSINGS MUST BE AT GRADE |
| | WITH THE SIDEWALK |
| | 10) THERE ARE MULTIPLE AND EXTREMELY WIDE GARAGE |
| | DRIVEWAYS THROUGHOUT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THUS, |
| | PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS MUST BE DISCUSSED AND |
| | IMPLEMENTED (I.E. PEDESTRIAN REFUGEE ISLANDS, PAVEMENT |
| | MARKINGS, WARNING SIGNS, AUDIBLE NOTIFICATIONS) |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| 2022-08-10 23:18:17 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS |
| | 1) PROVIDE FDOT ACCESS MANAGEMENT LETTER |
| | 2) PROVIDE COUNTY APPROVAL LETTER |
| | |
| | SITE COMMENTS |
| | 3) PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC SPECIFIC SET OF |
| | SITE PLANS, WITH EACH TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES |
| | (E.G. ROADWAY, DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, |
| | SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, SIGNS, PAVEMENT |
| | MARKINGS, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED |
| | THROUGHOUT THE CORRIDOR. THE CIVIL HORIZONTAL CONTROL |
| | PLANS, C4.00-4.03, ARE A STARTING POINT |
| | 4) IN THE SITE PLANS, BOTH SIDES OF EACH ROAD IMPACTED |
| | BY THE PROJECT, WITH CORRESPONDING TRANSPORTATION |
| | FEATURES SHOULD BE SHOWN |
| | 5) PROVIDE A NARRATIVE AND TABLES SUMMARIZING EXISTING |
| | CONDITIONS AND PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS FOR EACH BLOCK |
| | (I.E. NUMBER OF NEW OR REMOVED PARKING STALLS; |
| | MODIFICATIONS TO SIDEWALK, LANDSCAPE AND DRIVEWAY |
| | AREAS) |
| | 6) IF ANY OF THE EXISTING DRIVEWAYS ARE MODIFIED AS |
| | PART OF THE PROJECT, PLEASE PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS |
| | FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING |
| | IN/OUT OF THEM, WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND |
| | WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED. ANALYSIS |
| | SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE |
| | ANALYSIS |
| | 7) IDEALLY, TEN FEET WIDE SIDEWALKS SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | THROUGHOUT THE CORRIDOR, UNLESS PRECLUDED BY EXISTING |
| | ROAD OR BUILDING PHYSICAL CONSTRAINTS. IT IS NOT |
| | ACCEPTABLE THAT PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREAS ARE AT TIMES |
| | WIDER OR LARGER THAN ADJACENT PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES |
| | 8) PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS ALONG OKEECHOBEE |
| | BLVD DO NOT SEEM COMPLIANT WITH FDOT CORNER CLEARANCE |
| | AND INTERSECTION MINIMUM DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE |
| | REVISE AND PROPERLY SHOWCASE DIMENSIONS AND DISTANCES |
| | 9) WHEN POSSIBLE, DRIVEWAY CROSSINGS MUST BE AT GRADE |
| | WITH THE SIDEWALK |
| | 10) THERE ARE MULTIPLE AND EXTREMELY WIDE GARAGE |
| | DRIVEWAYS THROUGHOUT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THUS, |
| | PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS MUST BE DISCUSSED AND |
| | IMPLEMENTED (I.E. PEDESTRIAN REFUGEE ISLANDS, PAVEMENT |
| | MARKINGS, WARNING SIGNS, AUDIBLE NOTIFICATIONS) |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
