Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z22070008
Project Number Z22070008
Review Stop TRAFFIC
Sequence Number 5
Notes
Date Text
2022-11-15 23:00:51APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS TO BE SATISFIED
 AT ENGINEERING PERMITTING:
 1) CORRECT THE DRIVEWAY ON PINE ST, WHICH IS
 OVEREXTENDING ON THE PEDESTRIAN AREA. TO BE REDUCED AND
 PROPER SIGN AND STOP BAR INSTALLED. FURTHER SAFETY
 MEASURES SUCH AS AUDIBLE OR VISIBLE WARNING MESSAGE
 AND/OR SIGNAGE SHOULD BE CONTEMPLATED
 2) REMOVE THE PARKING STALLS ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF
 FLAGLER BETWEEN BUTLER AND PINE
 3) RESTRIPE THAT BLOCK SO TO ACCOMMODATE A 5-FEET WIDE
 BIKE LANE, WITH A 2-FEET DOUBLE STRIPED BUFFER IN THE
 SOUTHBOUND DIRECTION AND A NORTHBOUND LEFT-TURN STORAGE
 LANE
 4) INSTALLATION OF NO-PARKING SIGNS ON BOTH SIDES OF
 PINE ST FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, AS THE
 TWO-WAY ROADWAY IS JUST 21-FEET WIDE
 5) INSTALLATION OF EAST-DIRECTIONAL NO-PARKING SIGNS ON
 BOTH SIDES OF BUTLER ST, 35-FEET UPSTREAM FROM THE
 PEDESTRIAN CROSSING/STOP BAR AT THE FLAGLER
 INTERSECTION. ALSO INSTALL 2-FEET WIDE CHEVRON-STYLE
 PAVEMENT MARKERS ALONG THE NO-PARKING ZONE CURB
 6) PROVIDE A PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN, AS MENTIONED IN
 THE TRAFFIC STUDY
 7) PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN ACCORDING TO
 CITY CODE SEC. 84-246
  
 PREVIOUS COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A REVISED FULL TRAFFIC STUDY,
 WITHOUT THE TRAFFIC-CONCURRENCY-PURPOSES-ONLY
 ASSUMPTION/CONDITION. A SECOND METHODOLOGY MEETING TO
 DISCUSS MITIGATION MEASURES SHALL BE SETUP, IF
 POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS AND LOS DETERIORATION ARE
 IDENTIFIED OR PREDICTED
 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE AVAILABLE
 3) SATISFIED. PLEASE NUMBER EACH TABLE IN THE TRAFFIC
 STUDY
 4) SATISFIED. IN THE TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
 SUMMARY TABLES PLEASE INSERT THE RESULTS FOR THE
 FOLLOWING SCENARIOS: EXISTING, FUTURE NO-PROJECT,
 FUTURE-WITH-PROJECT
 5) SATISFIED. IN A SEPARATE TABLE SHOWCASE EACH OF THE
 VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS (I.E. LEFT, RIGHT, STRAIGHT) THAT
 RESULTS IN A LEVEL OF SERVICE E OR F
 6) SATISFIED. THE QUEUE ANALYSIS SEEMS TO FOCUS ON
 DROP-OFF OPERATIONS ONLY, WHILE IGNORING POTENTIAL
 INSTANCES OF CONCURRENT PICK-UP ONES, WHICH ARE
 CONDUCTED AT THE SAME LOCATIONS. PLEASE ADDRESS OR
 FURTHER ELABORATE SUCH CASES
 7) SATISFIED. IN APPENDIX C, PLEASE SHOW THE VALET
 PATHS ALONG THE SECOND FLOOR OF THE GARAGE. THE TRAFFIC
 STUDY DATED 10.26.22 IS MISSING APPENDIX C MATERIAL
 8) SATISFIED. IN APPENDIX C OR SHEET A-102 CLEARLY MARK
 THE VALET STALLS. THE TRAFFIC STUDY DATED 10.26.22 IS
 MISSING APPENDIX C MATERIAL
 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC
 SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING
 TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS,
 DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER,
 DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, SIGNAGE & PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. SHEET
 C-400 IS A STARTING POINT.
 10) SATISFIED. IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, PLEASE
 SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS,
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE BETTER ROADWAY DETAILS ON
 THE OPPOSITE SIDE ALONG PINE AND BUTLER
 11) SATISFIED. PROVIDE STRIPING PLANS FOR EACH ROAD
 FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE
 BETTER ROADWAY DETAILS ALONG PINE AND BUTLER.
 12) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND
 WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED. ANALYSIS
 SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE
 PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE
 ANALYSIS. ANALYSIS SUBMITTED ON 8/26 IS NOT PROPER; THE
 CITY CAN PROVIDE A SAMPLE REFERENCE ANALYSIS. SHOWCASE
 MANEUVERING OF A BOX TRUCK IN AND OUT OF EACH OF THE
 PROPOSED LOADING ZONES. SHEET C-901 SHOWS SEVERAL
 ENCROACHMENTS ALONG EACH OF THE DEPICTED PATHS; PLEASE
 ELABORATE ON THE VEHICLE MOVEMENT/POSITION BY THE
 GARAGE RAMP-UP LOCATION.
 13) SATISFIED. THERE ARE A TOTAL OF FIVE ACCESS
 POINTS/DRIVEWAYS. CITY CODE 94-312(1)(B)(1) ALLOWS A
 MAXIMUM TOTAL OF FOUR. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
 CONVERSATION WITH CITY STAFF DID NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC
 ENGINEERING.
 14) SATISFIED. THERE ARE THREE DRIVEWAYS ON BUTLER ST,
 PER CITY CODE 94-312(1)(A): MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESS
 POINTS ONTO EACH ROW FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WITH
 75+ UNITS IS TWO. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
 CONVERSATION WITH CITY STAFF DID NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC
 ENGINEERING.
 15) [OVERRULED] NOT SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE
 94-312(4)(C): ACCESS TO ALL RESIDENTIAL LOTS IN A
 PROPOSED SUBDIVISION SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE LOWEST
 FUNCTIONAL CLASS OF ROADWAY HAVING FRONTAGE ON THE LOT.
 GIVEN THE POSSIBILITY TO ACCESS THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT THROUGH TWO LOCAL ROADS (BUTLER AND PINE
 ST), THE N FLAGLER DRIVEWAY IS NOT WARRANTED, AS IT
 FRONTS AN URBAN COLLECTOR. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
 CONVERSATION WITH CITY STAFF DID NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC
 ENGINEERING.
 16) SATISFIED. INSTALL A HIGH-VISIBILITY PEDESTRIAN
 CROSSING CONNECTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO THE
 EASTERN PROMENADE EITHER MID-BLOCK OR AT THE EXISTING
 EASTERN RAMPS (NORTH OF PINE AND SOUTH OF BUTLER. IN
 CASE OF THE FORMER, CONNECT THE EXISTING EASTERN RAMPS
 WITH STANDARD CROSSINGS. PROVIDE ENGINEERING DRAWINGS
 AND DETAILS FOR SUCH HIGH-VISIBILITY CROSSING. ALSO
 INSTALL RECTANGULAR RAPID-FLASHING BEACONS (RRFB) AT
 SUCH CROSSING, PROVIDE A DETAIL SHEET FOR SUCH SAFETY
 ENHANCEMENT
 17) SATISFIED. PROPERLY DEPICT AND ANALYZE VALET
 LOCATIONS AND OPERATIONS. THE ANALYSIS MUST BE
 CORROBORATED WITH VEHICLE PATHS TO/FROM THE GARAGE. IN
 THE QUEUE ANALYSIS PROVIDE A DETAILED BREAKDOWN FOR
 EACH PROCESSING TIMESTEP (I.E. VEHICLE
 ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE, VALET PICK-UP/DROP-OFF, VALET WALK
 TO/FROM THE PODIUM OR GARAGE). THE BUTLER ST LOCATION
 WOULD NOT PROPERLY OPERATE WITH A SINGLE LANE, AS THE
 QUEUE OF DROP-OFF VEHICLES WAITING TO BE PARKED WOULD
 BLOCK THE ONES MEANT FOR PICK-UP.
 18) SATISFIED. A BY-PASS LANE MUST BE PROVIDED AT EACH
 VALET SERVICE LOCATION. PROVIDE A BY-PASS LANE AT THE
 BUTLER VALET STATION OR PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS
 SHOWCASING THE U-TURN MANEUVER DEPICTED IN THE VALET
 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
 19) SATISFIED. IF APPROVED AND FEASIBLE, AND FOR SAFETY
 PURPOSES, THE BUTLER DROP-OFF LOCATION MUST BE A
 MINIMUM OF 12-FEET WIDE. EVEN IF VALET OPERATIONS HAVE
 BEEN DISCONTINUED, SUCH LOCATION SHOULD BE WIDENED FOR
 SAKE OF SAFETY DUE TO THE FREQUENCY OF EITHER DRIVERS
 OR PASSENGERS GETTING IN/OUT OF THE VEHICLES;
 OTHERWISE, PLEASE CONSIDER REMOVING OR RELOCATING SUCH
 AREA. SAME COMMENT AND REQUIREMENT APPLY TO THE PINE
 STREET DROP-OFF LOCATION
 20) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AND CLEARLY MARK A TURN-AROUND
 SPACE AT EACH DEAD-END OF THE GARAGE. PROPOSED
 TURN-AROUND SPACES ARE NOT PROPER, THOSE CAN BE
 CONSIDERED BACK-OUT SPACES. ONE OF THE PARKING STALLS
 NEAR THE END WALLS MUST BE DESIGNATED, AND
 CORRESPONDING PAVEMENT MARKING & SIGNAGE PROVIDED.
 UNLESS AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR EACH OF THE DEAD-ENDS
 PROVING THAT A 3-POINT TURN IS FEASIBLE, THE LATEST
 PROPOSED TURN-AROUND AREAS ARE NOT SATISFACTORY. SHEET
 A-102, NORTHERN-EASTERN DEAD-END, CONVERT THE PROPOSED
 TURNAROUND SPACE ON THE RIGHT OF 2-25 TO A PARKING
 STALL AND DESIGNATE 2-27 AS THE TURNAROUND AREA. APPLY
 THE SAME CONVERSION TO THE NORTH-EASTERN DEAD-END IN
 SHEET A-103 AND A-104 FOR 3-25 AND 3-27, 4-25 AND 4-27,
 RESPECTIVELY. TURN-AROUND SPACE IS MISSING IN SHEET
 A-105 FOR THE NORTH-WEST DEAD-END
 21) SATISFIED. CLEARLY MARK AND DIMENSION THE REQUIRED
 LOADING ZONE(S). PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER
 SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE
 22) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. PROVIDE DOCUMENT
 NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH ITEM. PER CITY
 CODE SECTION 94 TABLE XV-3 THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF ADA
 STALLS REQUIRED IS TWENTY (20). MOREOVER, THE NUMBER OF
 ADA STALLS SHOULD HAVE A MUCH HIGHER DISTRIBUTION ON
 THE GROUND FLOOR AND THE FIRST LEVEL OF THE GARAGE.
 PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY
 23) SATISFIED. CLEARLY MARK AND DIMENSION EACH OF THE
 HANDICAP STALLS
 24) [NOT APPLICABLE] PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND
 MANAGEMENT (TDM) STRATEGIES. CONVERSATION WITH CITY
 STAFF DID NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING. CITY CODE
 FOR CMUD CORE I DOES ENCOURAGE IMPLEMENTATION OF TDM.
 MOREOVER, TDM WOULD BE STRONGLY RECOMMENDED IN THE CASE
 THE TRAFFIC STUDY SHOWS INTERSECTION LOS DEGRADATION
 DUE TO THE VEHICULAR VOLUMES GENERATED BY THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT
 25) [TO BE SATISFIED AT ENGINEERING PERMITTING] ALLEY
 SHOULD BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH
 PUBLIC WORKS PERTAINING PREFERRED DIRECTIONALITY, IF
 ANY SANITATION VEHICLES WOULD BE TRAVERSING THE ALLEY,
 AS WELL AS REACH OUT TO EVERY AFFECTED PARCEL OWNER FOR
 NOTIFICATION AND APPROVAL PURPOSES.
 26) SATISFIED. SHOWCASE THE FULL EXTENT OF THE ALLEY ON
 THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN. NOTE: THE ACTUAL WIDTH OF
 THE ALLEY SHOULD BE SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED, INCLUSIVE OF
 BACKYARD LOTS, DRIVEWAYS AND PARKING STALLS OF THE
 ABUTTING PARCELS
 27) [TO BE SATISFIED AT ENGINEERING PERMITTING] PROVIDE
 AND SHOWCASE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS ALONG THE ALLEY. NOTE: ONE-WAY SIGNS SHOULD BE
 INSTALLED THROUGHOUT ITS EXTENT AND ACCORDING TO
 ABUTTING PARCELS TRANSPORTATION CHARACTERISTICS
 28) SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE PARKING AREA
 ALONG PINE STREET.
 29) [TO BE SATISFIED AT ENGINEERING PERMITTING]
 RESTRIPE FLAGLER TO ACCOMMODATE A 11-FEET WIDE
 NORTHBOUND LEFT-TURN STORAGE LANE, BEGINNING JUST NORTH
 OF THE HIGH-VISIBILITY PEDESTRIAN CROSSING. TO
 ACCOMMODATE SUCH FEATURE, REMOVE ALL ON-STREET PARKING
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS ALONG THE WESTERN SIDE OF FLAGLER
 BETWEEN BUTLER AND PINE, AND INSTALL A 5-FEET WIDE BIKE
 LANE WITH A 2-FEET DOUBLE STRIPED BUFFER IN LIEU OF THE
 PARKING STALLS
 30) [OVERRULED BY ADMIN] DRIVEWAY ON FLAGLER SHOULD BE
 RIGHT-OUT ONLY. LEFT-TURN OUTBOUND MOVEMENTS SHOULD BE
 FORBIDDEN. INSTALL CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE, CORRECT
 DRIVEWAY GEOMETRY, EXTEND THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY MEDIAN
 ISLAND AND DESIGN ITS TERMINAL TO CHANNELIZE THE
 RIGHT-TURN OUTBOUND MOVEMENTS AND IMPEDE THE LEFT-TURN
 ONES
 31) SATISFIED. IF ANY DRIVEWAY GATES ARE PROPOSED,
 PLEASE SHOWCASE THE 20-FEET MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM THE
 BACK OF THE SIDEWALK
 32) [TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMITTING] INSTALL
 DIRECTIONAL (EAST-POINTING) NO-PARKING SIGN 40-FEET
 UPSTREAM FROM THE BUTLER AND FLAGLER INTERSECTION
 33) [TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMITTING] BASED ON
 THE AUTOTURN ANALYSES, INSTALL NO-PARKING SIGNS ALONG
 THE NORTHERN SIDE OF BUTLER IN ORDER TO FACILITATE
 LARGE VEHICLES TURNING MOVEMENTS
 34) [TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMITTING] INSTALL
 NO-PARKING SIGNS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD ALONG THE
 SECTION OF PINE STREET FRONTING THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT
 35) SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND IN THE MIDDLE OF
 THE SIDEWALK NEARBY THE PINE ST DRIVEWAY SHOULD BE
 REDUCED, AS IT IS UNSAFELY HINDERING PEDESTRIAN FLOW IN
 THE PROXIMITY OF THE CROSSWALK
 36) [TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMITTING] PROVIDE A
 PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN, AS MENTIONED IN THE TRAFFIC
 STUDY
 37) [TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMITTING] PROVIDE A
 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE REFER TO CITY CODE
 SEC. 84-246 FOR DETAILS
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved