| Date |
Text |
| 2022-09-07 14:20:56 | |
| | 1) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A REVISED FULL TRAFFIC STUDY, |
| | WITHOUT THE TRAFFIC-CONCURRENCY-PURPOSES-ONLY |
| | ASSUMPTION/CONDITION. A SECOND METHODOLOGY MEETING TO |
| | DISCUSS MITIGATION MEASURES SHALL BE SETUP, IF |
| | POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS AND LOS DETERIORATION ARE |
| | IDENTIFIED OR PREDICTED |
| | 2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE |
| | AVAILABLE |
| | 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC |
| | SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING |
| | TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, |
| | DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, |
| | DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, SIGNAGE & PAVEMENT |
| | MARKINGS ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. SHEET |
| | C-400 IS A STARTING POINT. |
| | 4) NOT SATISFIED. IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, |
| | PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB |
| | CUTS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE |
| | OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE BETTER ROADWAY DETAILS ON |
| | THE OPPOSITE SIDE ALONG PINE AND BUTLER |
| | 5) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE STRIPING PLANS FOR EACH ROAD |
| | FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | BETTER ROADWAY DETAILS ALONG PINE AND BUTLER |
| | 6) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE |
| | TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND |
| | WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED. ANALYSIS |
| | SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE |
| | ANALYSIS. ANALYSIS SUBMITTED ON 8/26 IS NOT PROPER; THE |
| | CITY CAN PROVIDE A SAMPLE REFERENCE ANALYSIS |
| | 7) NOT SATISFIED. THERE ARE A TOTAL OF FIVE ACCESS |
| | POINTS/DRIVEWAYS. CITY CODE 94-312(1)(B)(1) ALLOWS A |
| | MAXIMUM TOTAL OF FOUR. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY. |
| | CONVERSATION WITH CITY STAFF DID NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC |
| | ENGINEERING. |
| | 8) NOT SATISFIED. THERE ARE THREE DRIVEWAYS ON BUTLER |
| | ST, PER CITY CODE 94-312(1)(A): MAXIMUM NUMBER OF |
| | ACCESS POINTS ONTO EACH ROW FOR RESIDENTIAL |
| | DEVELOPMENTS WITH 75+ UNITS IS TWO. PLEASE REVISE |
| | ACCORDINGLY. CONVERSATION WITH CITY STAFF DID NOT |
| | INCLUDE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING. |
| | 9) NOT SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE 94-312(4)(C): ACCESS TO |
| | ALL RESIDENTIAL LOTS IN A PROPOSED SUBDIVISION SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED FROM THE LOWEST FUNCTIONAL CLASS OF ROADWAY |
| | HAVING FRONTAGE ON THE LOT. GIVEN THE POSSIBILITY TO |
| | ACCESS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT THROUGH TWO LOCAL ROADS |
| | (BUTLER AND PINE ST), THE N FLAGLER DRIVEWAY IS NOT |
| | WARRANTED, AS IT FRONTS AN URBAN COLLECTOR. PLEASE |
| | REVISE ACCORDINGLY. CONVERSATION WITH CITY STAFF DID |
| | NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING. |
| | 10) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. INSTALL A HIGH-VISIBILITY |
| | PEDESTRIAN CROSSING CONNECTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | TO THE EASTERN PROMENADE EITHER MID-BLOCK OR AT THE |
| | EXISTING EASTERN RAMPS (NORTH OF PINE AND SOUTH OF |
| | BUTLER. IN CASE OF THE FORMER, CONNECT THE EXISTING |
| | EASTERN RAMPS WITH STANDARD CROSSINGS. PROVIDE |
| | ENGINEERING DRAWINGS AND DETAILS FOR SUCH |
| | HIGH-VISIBILITY CROSSING. ALSO INSTALL RECTANGULAR |
| | RAPID-FLASHING BEACONS (RRFB) AT SUCH CROSSING, PROVIDE |
| | A DETAIL SHEET FOR SUCH SAFETY ENHANCEMENT |
| | 11) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROPERLY DEPICT AND ANALYZE |
| | VALET LOCATIONS AND OPERATIONS. THE ANALYSIS MUST BE |
| | CORROBORATED WITH VEHICLE PATHS TO/FROM THE GARAGE. IN |
| | THE QUEUE ANALYSIS PROVIDE A DETAILED BREAKDOWN FOR |
| | EACH PROCESSING TIMESTEP (I.E. VEHICLE |
| | ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE, VALET PICK-UP/DROP-OFF, VALET WALK |
| | TO/FROM THE PODIUM OR GARAGE). THE BUTLER ST LOCATION |
| | WOULD NOT PROPERLY OPERATE WITH A SINGLE LANE, AS THE |
| | QUEUE OF DROP-OFF VEHICLES WAITING TO BE PARKED WOULD |
| | BLOCK THE ONES MEANT FOR PICK-UP. |
| | 12) NOT SATISFIED. A BY-PASS LANE MUST BE PROVIDED AT |
| | EACH VALET SERVICE LOCATION. PROVIDE A BY-PASS LANE AT |
| | THE BUTLER VALET STATION. |
| | 13) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AND CLEARLY MARK A |
| | TURN-AROUND SPACE AT EACH DEAD-END OF THE GARAGE. |
| | PROPOSED TURN-AROUND SPACES ARE NOT PROPER, THOSE CAN |
| | BE CONSIDERED BACK-OUT SPACES. ONE OF THE PARKING |
| | STALLS NEAR THE END WALLS MUST BE DESIGNATED, AND |
| | PROPER PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNAGE PROVIDED |
| | 14) SATISFIED. CLEARLY MARK AND DIMENSION THE REQUIRED |
| | LOADING ZONE(S). PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER |
| | SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE |
| | 15) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE |
| | SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING |
| | SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. PROVIDE |
| | DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH ITEM. |
| | PER CITY CODE SECTION 94 TABLE XV-3 THE MINIMUM NUMBER |
| | OF ADA STALLS REQUIRED IS TWENTY (2). MOREOVER, THE |
| | NUMBER OF ADA STALLS SHOULD HAVE A MUCH HIGHER |
| | DISTRIBUTION ON THE GROUND FLOOR AND THE FIRST LEVEL OF |
| | THE GARAGE. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY |
| | 16) SATISFIED. CLEARLY MARK AND DIMENSION EACH OF THE |
| | HANDICAP STALLS |
| | 17) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND |
| | MANAGEMENT (TDM) STRATEGIES. CONVERSATION WITH CITY |
| | STAFF DID NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING. |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
