City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Notes

Plan Review Notes For Project Z22070008
Project Number	Z22070008
Review Stop	STORM
Sequence Number	2

Notes

Date	Text
2022-10-18 16:47:31	THE FOLLOWING NOTES WERE NOT ABLE TO BE INPUT INTO
	COMMUNITY PLUS AT THE TIME OF REVIEW DUE TO THE IT
	ISSUES WITH COMMUNITY PLUS. THE COMMENTS WERE EMAILED
	TO THE CONSULTANT AND ARE BEING ADDED TO COMMUNITY PLUS
	ON 10/18/2022 AS STORM #2. STORM #3 COMMENTS WILL
	ADDRESS THE 9/30/2022 RE-SUBMITTAL.


	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
	8/26/2022 SUBMITTAL.


	1. [NOT SATISFIED ??? REVISED SURVEY NOT INCLUDED IN
	THE SUBMITTAL] THE CITY???S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS
	NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 AS
	LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE
	PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE VERTICAL
	DATUM CONVERSION TO NGVD1929 ON THE SURVEY.

	2. [SATISFIED] MOVE THE TRENCH DRAIN OUTSIDE THE RIGHT
	OF WAY OF PINE STREET.

	3. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? EXPLAIN HOW SEA LEVEL RISE
	WAS CONSIDERED] DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS TO CONSIDER SEA
	LEVEL RISE ON THE GROUNDWATER TABLE AND TAILWATER
	CONDITIONS.

	4. [NOT SATISFIED] JUSTIFY THE DIAMETER OF THE OUTFALL
	PIPE.

	5. [SATISFIED] WHAT WILL BE THE CONTRIBUTING AREA TO
	THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH UNDER THE DRIVEWAY TO N.
	FLAGLER DRIVE. THE HEAD ON THE TRENCH WILL BE LIMITED
	TO THE TRENCH DRAIN RIM ELEVATION.

	6. [SATISFIED] DESIGN ACCESS (HEIGHT CLEARANCE) TO
	EXFILTRATION TRENCH SYSTEMS FOR MAINTENANCE AND FUTURE
	REPLACEMENT WHEN THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES ARE NO
	LONGER FUNCTIONING AS DESIGNED.

	7. [SATISFIED] SIDEWALK AND PARKING EASEMENTS WILL BE
	NEEDED FOR SIDEWALKS AND ON-STREET PARKING SPACES
	OUTSIDE THE RIGHT OF WAY.

	8. [SATISFIED ??? NOTE PIPE INVERTS DO NOT MATCH PLAN
	VIEW] PROVIDE DETAIL OF CONTROL STRUCTURE AND SHOW THE
	WEIR ELEVATION ON THE PGD PLANS.

	9. [SATISFIED] BLEEDERS ARE NOT PERMITTED WITH
	EXFILTRATION TRENCH SYSTEMS.

	10. [SATISFIED ??? SHOW AND LABEL PROPOSED PROPERTY
	LINES AT EACH END OF THE ALLEY ABANDONMENT] SHOW THE
	LIMITS OF THE PROPOSED ALLEY ABANDONMENT.

	11. SHOW HOW ALLEY GRADING WILL TRANSITION TO EXISTING
	GRADE.

	12. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM CENTERLINE
	OF ROADWAY TO FACE OF BUILDING(S). LABEL STREET NAME
	AND SHOW RIGHT OF WAY LINE, SURFACE FEATURES AND
	SLOPES, BREAK POINTS, AND HORIZONTAL DISTANCES FROM
	RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO SURFACE FEATURES.

	13.[SATISFIED] PROVIDE SECTIONS AT ALL DRIVEWAYS FROM 5
	FEET FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT TO 5 FEET PAST HIGH POINT OF
	DRIVEWAY (OR TRENCH DRAIN). SHOW RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND
	DISTANCE FROM R/W TO EP, BACK OF SIDEWALK, HIGH
	POINT/TRENCH DRAIN.

	14. [SATISFIED] SHOW EXISTING STORM PIPE ON PINE STREET
	WEST OF AND CONNECTING TO THE EXISTING STORM MANHOLE
	SOUTHEAST OF STRUCTURE ST-31.

	15. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] LABEL EXISTING UTILITIES IN
	THE RIGHT OF WAY (PIPE SIZE, MATERIAL, ETC.)

	16. [SATISFIED] LABEL PROPOSED CURBS AND GUTTERS.

	17. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR
	ELEVATIONS ON THE PGD PLANS.

	18. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? INCLUDE MILL AND RESURFACE
	HATCHING IN THE SHEET LEGENDS.] SHOW MILL AND
	RESURFACING LIMITS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS WITHIN THESE
	LIMITS.

	19. [SATISFIED] WATER MAIN MAY BE IN CONFLICT WITH
	PROPOSED STRUCTURE ST-31.

	20. [SATISFIED] THERE APPEARS TO BE A LOW POINT IN THE
	EP IN FRONT OF THE DRIVEWAY TO BUTLER STREET OPPOSITE
	BROWARD AVE. HOW WILL THIS AREA IN FRONT OF THE
	DRIVEWAY DRAIN?

	21. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EXISTING GRADES
	ALONG THE EP OF N. FLAGLER DRIVE, NORTH OF THE PROPOSED
	DRIVEWAY.

	NEW COMMENTS (8/26/2022 SUBMITTAL)

	22. SECTION A-A
	A. BEGINNING OF DRIVEWAY SHOULD MEET EXISTING GRADE.
	B. VALLEY GUTTER MAY NOT BE NEEDED.
	C. CREATE A HIGH POINT IN THE DRIVEWAY AT THE BACK OF
	SIDEWALK AND ELIMINATE THE TRENCH DRAIN. ADD A CATCH
	BASIN ONTO THE 18 INCH STORM PIPE TO COLLECT RUNOFF
	WITHIN THE BUILDING.

	23. SECTION C-C
	A. MOVE SECTION ABOUT 20 FEET TO THE WEST TO FALL
	WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE AREA BETWEEN THE SIDEWALKS AND
	THROUGH THE SEATWALLS.
	B. FG LINE APPEARS TO BE SHIFTED TO THE RIGHT. IF NOT
	THEN ABOUT 5 FEET OF SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPE IS TOO STEEP.
	C. CONFIRM PROPOSED GRADE OF 6.01 (VS. 6.10 ON PGD
	PLAN).
	D. R/W DIMENSIONS ADD UP TO LESS THAN 37.5 FEET.
	E. THE FLOOR OF THE BUILDING INTERIOR APPEARS TO HAVE
	10% SLOPE.
	F. SHEET A0.08 SHOWS A DOOR OPENING TO THE CAF?? SPACE
	WHERE THE PGD PLAN SHOWS SPOT GRADES BETWEEN 8.03 FEET
	AND 6.34 FEET NAVD ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING. CAF?? FFE
	IS 9.00 FEET NAVD.

	24. SECTION D-D
	A. NOT SHOWN ON KEY MAP.
	B. BEGINNING OF DRIVEWAY SHOULD MEET EXISTING GRADE.

	25. SECTION F-F
	A. CREATE A HIGH POINT IN THE DRIVEWAY AT THE
	PROPERTY/RIGHT OF WAY LINE, CONVERT ST-29 TO A CATCH
	BASIN AND ELIMINATE THE TRENCH DRAIN. THIS WILL ALLOW
	ST-29 TO BE SMALLER THAN 7 FEET IN DIAMETER BY
	ELIMINATING THE SOUTH PIPE CONNECTION.
	B. R/W DIMENSIONS ADD UP TO LESS THAN 25 FEET.

	26. SECTION G-G
	A. DIMENSIONS DO NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON SHEET
	C-400.
	B. SECTION SYMBOL ON KEY MAP SHOULD POINT TO THE WEST.
	C. WILL SIDEWALK HAVE A THICKENED EDGE? PROVIDE A
	DETAIL OF THE SIDEWALK IF SO.
	D. SHOW HEIGHT OF SITE WALL.
	E. CREATE A SWALE OR BERM ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE TO
	PREVENT DIRECT RUNOFF ONTO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY.
	F. SHOW CURBING ADJACENT TO THE ISLAND AND IN-BOUND
	DRIVEWAY.

	27. SECTION H-H
	A. SHOW HEIGHT OF SITE WALLS.
	B. WHY CAN???T THE FRONT OF SIDEWALK NEAREST THE R/W
	MATCH EXISTING GRADE?
	C. CREATE SWALE BEHIND EAST SITE WALL TO PREVENT
	RUNOFF FROM FLOWING ONTO SIDEWALK.

	28. PROVIDE DETAIL SHOWING 18-INCH PIPE CONNECTION TO
	TRENCH DRAIN.

	29. SECTION G-G SHOWS THE DRIVEWAY SLOPING TO THE
	NORTH. THE TRENCH DRAIN ACROSS N. FLAGLER DRIVEWAY
	NEEDS TO EXTEND TO NORTH CURB LINE.

	30. CONSIDER ADDING TRENCH DRAIN ALONG NORTH CURB LINE
	WEST OF THE SIDEWALK CROSSING OF THE N. FLAGLER
	DRIVEWAY TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF RUNOFF FLOWING ACROSS
	THE SIDEWALK CROSSING.

	31. DRIVEWAY APRONS WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE
	CONCRETE.

	32. CONSIDER MOVING SANITARY MANHOLE SS-05 OUT OF THE
	DRIVEWAY AND OUT OF THE SIDEWALK. COORDINATE WITH THE
	PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT.

	33. REMOVE STRUCTURES ST-28 AND ST-34 OUT OF THE ALLEY
	R/W.

	34. SOUTH EDGE OF ALLEY NEEDS TO MEET EXISTING GRADE AT
	RIGHT OF WAY.

	35. WILL SIDEWALK AT DROPOFF AREA BE FLUSH WITH
	PAVEMENT AND/OR HAVE THICKENED EDGE?


	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120 (O)
	561-351-0510 (M)
	[email protected]

	Print