Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z22070008
Project Number Z22070008
Review Stop PU-CS
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2022-09-01 15:35:08PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING:
 -RESPONSE LETTER SAID FDC LOCATIONS HAVE NOT BEEN
 FINALIZED. REMINDER TO FINALIZE FDC LOCATIONS.
 -RESPONSE LETTER SAID ORDERING ADDITIONAL SURVEY.
 REMINDER TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL SURVEY.
 -SOME PAVEMENT RESTORATION AREAS ON SHEET C600 AND C500
 STILL APPEAR TO BE MISSING FOR PROPOSED SEWER MAINS ON
 FLAGER DR. AND PINE ST. DIXIE MAY BE NEEDED ALSO.
 -EAST SIDE OF FLAGLER SHOWS BIG CONCRETE SLAB PROPOSED
 ON SHEET C500. PLEASE DESCRIBE THE PURPOSE OF THE
 CONCRETE SLAB AND IF ANYTHING IS GOING ON TOP OF IT. IF
 THERE IS A PLAN SHEET SHOWING PROPOSED USE, PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE REFERENCE NUMBER.
 -ON SHEET C611 PLEASE REMOVE WS10 AND REPLACE WITH WS5
 REV SEP2019.
 -THERE IS A WATER MAIN PROJECT AT INTERSECTION OF
 BUTLER AND BROWARD THAT MAY HAVE STARTED ALREADY AND
 CIVIL ENGINEER SHOULD BE AWARE OF.
 -SHEET C500 DOES NOT MATCH HARDSCAPE PLAN L3-1-01 WITH
 RESPECT TO THE SIDEWALK DESIGN AT WEST SIDE OF FLAGLER
 ADJACENT TO SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 1923 N FLAGLER DR.
 -SHEET C602 AND C600: LABEL SANITARY SEWER MAIN RUNNING
 NORTH AT BUTLER AND BROWARD INTERSECTION WITH PIPE SIZE
 AND MATERIAL TYPE. IF IT IS 10 INCH VCP, WILL
 WASTEWATER DESIGN WORK ALRIGHT?
 -SHEET C600: AT WESTERN SIDE OF PINE ST THERE IS
 CALLOUT FOR EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT. VERIFY IF IT IS
 THERE AS DO NOT SEE ON HISTORIC PICTURES OF AREA. IF
 THERE, ADD SYMBOL. IF NOT, REMOVE CALLOUT.
 -SHEETS C600 AND C602: FOR THE PROPOSED 3 INCH AND 4
 INCH METERS, THE FOOTPRINT WOULD BE MUCH LARGER THAN
 SHOWN. ALSO THE WATER SERVICE LINES AND CURBSTOPS COULD
 NOT BE 2 INCH SIZE OR PE, AND MAY NEED SPACING FURTHER
 APART.
 -LANDSCAPING PLAN L0.1.01 SHOWS LARGE UTILITY POLE AND
 TREE CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED WATER SERVICES AND METER
 BOXES. NEED APPROPRIATE HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE DISTANCE.
 -SOME PLANS SHOW LARGE UTILITY POLE NEAR NORTHEAST
 CORNER OF NORTHWEST DRIVEWAY. PLEASE MAKE SURE IT IS
 ACCOUNTED FOR IN CIVIL PLANS.
 -UTILITIES DESIGN ON LANDSCAPING PLANS DOES NOT MATCH
 CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS. PLEASE MAKE SURE BOTH SETS OF
 PLANS MATCH BASIC UTILITIES DESIGN AND THERE ARE NO
 CONFLICTS BETWEEN LANDSCAPING AND UTILITIES.
 -L0.1.01 AREA 3 SAYS GARDEN CAF? SEATING. PLEASE
 PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THAT AREA. IS IT JUST GRASS
 AREA THAT PEOPLE CAN SIT ON, OR WILL THERE BE TABLES
 AND CHAIRS THERE? IF A PLAN SHEET SHOWS MORE INFO ON
 IT, PLEASE ALSO PROVIDE THAT REFERENCE NUMBER.
 -UTILITY WOULD PREFER THE PROPOSED 3 INCH AND 4 INCH
 METERS (NOT BACKFLOWS) CLOSER TO CURB IN THE
 LANDSCAPING AREA IF PROPER SPACING AND CLEARANCE
 DISTANCE COULD BE ACHIEVED WITH THE TREES.
 -FOR THE PROPOSED 3 INCH AND 4 INCH METERS TO THE
 NORTHEAST, ADD WORDING ABOVE-GROUND TO LABELS.
 RESPECTFULLY,
 MARK HURLEY [email protected]
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved