| Date |
Text |
| 2022-08-09 16:18:12 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) AS MENTIONED BY STAFF DURING THE PRE-APPLICATION |
| | MEETING(S) WITH THE APPLICANT, PUBLIC OUTREACH ON THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS CRITICAL (AND PRIOR TO THE |
| | FORMAL SUBMITTAL OF THE PROJECT). HAS THIS BEEN |
| | ACCOMPLISHED? |
| | |
| | 2.) AS MENTIONED BY STAFF DURING THE PRE-APPLICATION |
| | MEETING(S) WITH THE APPLICANT, IT IS IMPORTANT TO |
| | CLEARLY STATE HOW THE PROJECT INTENDS TO SPECIFICALLY |
| | MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE HEIGHT INCENTIVES IN THE |
| | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT (I.E. STATEMENT ADHERING TO |
| | TIMELINES AS SPECIFIED, PAYMENTS FOR THE ACTUAL |
| | CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS OR CONTRIBUTION TO AN |
| | IMPROVEMENT FUND, ETC.). THIS INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 3.) A SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION (SCAD) |
| | IS REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT THE PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | SCHOOL DISTRICT ON THE PROCESS TO OBTAIN THE SCAD |
| | LETTER. |
| | |
| | 4.) A TPS LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY-TRAFFIC |
| | DIVISION IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 5.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC |
| | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR |
| | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE |
| | COLLECTION SERVICES. |
| | |
| | 6.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| | CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH |
| | INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE |
| | PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FPL AND |
| | COMCAST. |
| | |
| | 7.) THE ADDRESS LIST AFFIDAVIT WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE |
| | SUBMITTAL. PLEASE PROVIDE. |
| | |
| | 8.) A REPLAT OF THE PROJECT SITE WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 9.) PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL FINAL PLANS (I.E. CIVIL, |
| | LANDSCAPE AND ARCHITECTURAL) MOVING FORWARD TO THE |
| | PUBLIC HEARING STAGE SHALL BE SIGNED AND SEALED. |
| | |
| | 10.) AT LEAST TWO (2) HARDCOPY SETS SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | IN FULL COLOR. |
| | |
| | 11.) ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND PER CMUD |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | |
| | FLAGLER DRIVE PARKWAY SYSTEM: |
| | |
| | THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING THE 30 FT. HEIGHT INCENTIVE BY |
| | PROVIDING THE 30 FT. WIDE FLAGLER DRIVE PARKWAY SYSTEM. |
| | PER THE ZLDRS, THE PARKWAY EASEMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE PROPERTY ABUTTING |
| | FLAGLER DRIVE. AT THIS TIME, STAFF CANNOT SUPPORT THE |
| | INCENTIVE, AS THE PARKWAY DESIGN REQUIREMENTS HAVE NOT |
| | BEEN MET: |
| | |
| | 1.) PROVIDE DIMENSIONS SHOWING THE 10 FT. WIDE CLEAR |
| | MEANDERING MULTI-PURPOSE PATHWAY. |
| | |
| | 2.) THE MEANDERING PATH IS EXPECTED TO BE CONTINUOUS |
| | AND CONNECT WITH ADJACENT PROPERTIES AS FUTURE |
| | DEVELOPMENT OCCURS. THE MEANDERING PATH SHALL EXTEND TO |
| | THE PROPERTY LINE OF THE ADJACENT PARCELS (IN ADDITION |
| | TO THE EXISTING SIDEWALK CONNECTION). |
| | |
| | 3.) THE PARKWAY SHALL BE DESIGNED WITH STREET |
| | FURNITURE. STREET FURNITURE SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | CONSISTENTLY ALONG THE CORRIDOR, AS APPROVED BY THE |
| | CITY. THE PROPOSED PARKWAY DESIGN IN THE PLAN SET DOES |
| | NOT EXHIBIT ANY STREET FURNISHINGS. |
| | |
| | 4.) STREETLIGHTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ATTAIN THE |
| | APPROPRIATE FOOT CANDLE MEASUREMENT NECESSARY FOR SAFE |
| | PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR MOVEMENT. LIGHT FIXTURES/POLES |
| | SHALL MEET THE CITY APPROVED STANDARD. NO INFORMATION |
| | WAS PROVIDED ON STREETLIGHTS WITHIN THE PARKWAY. |
| | |
| | 5.) THE INCENTIVE IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE A PUBLIC |
| | BENEFIT WITH THE PARKWAY EXTENDING ACROSS THE ENTIRE |
| | FRONTAGE WITHOUT INTERRUPTIONS. THE PURPOSE IS TO |
| | CREATE AN ACTIVE PEDESTRIAN SPACE WITHIN THE PARKWAY. |
| | THE DESIGN WITH THE PROPOSED VEHICULAR ACCESS POINT ON |
| | FLAGLER DRIVE DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT OF THE PARKWAY |
| | AND SHALL BE REMOVED IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR THE HEIGHT |
| | INCENTIVE. |
| | |
| | 6.) IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT PER THE CMUD |
| | REGULATIONS, THE PROPERTY OWNER AND THEIR SUCCESSORS OR |
| | ASSIGNS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND |
| | ONGOING MAINTENANCE OF THE PARKWAY EASEMENT. THE |
| | PARKWAY EASEMENT SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE CLERK OF |
| | PALM BEACH COUNTY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST |
| | BUILDING PERMIT FOR DEVELOPMENT. |
| | |
| | 7.) THE DESIGN COULD BE IMPROVED BY INCORPORATING |
| | GROUND LEVEL COMMERCIAL/RETAIL PEDESTRIAN WALK-UPS FROM |
| | FLAGLER DRIVE. |
| | |
| | 8.) SHOW BUILDING AND ROADWAY SECTION AS IT RELATES TO |
| | THE SPACIAL RELATIONSHIP FROM CURRIE PARK, FLAGLER |
| | DRIVE, PARKWAY TO THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PER THE MU DISTRICT REGULATIONS, THE MAXIMUM |
| | HORIZONTAL DIMENSION OF A BUILDING SHALL NOT EXCEED 250 |
| | FEET. THE MAXIMUM LENGTH OF THE BUILDING APPEARS TO BE |
| | EXCEEDED. [ZLDR S.94-209] |
| | |
| | 2.) THE MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS MUST BE |
| | SHOWN ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE AND THE BUILDING SETBACK |
| | ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE MUST BE LOCATED WITHIN THIS RANGE |
| | AT THE PODIUM/GROUND LEVEL. THE PROPOSED BUILDING |
| | SETBACK INFORMATION CANNOT BE FOUND. [ZLDR S.94-215] |
| | |
| | 3.) BUTLER STREET IS A SECONDARY A STREET. THERE IS A |
| | MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK ESTABLISHED FOR |
| | BUTLER STREET AND THE PODIUM/GROUND FLOOR LEVEL MUST BE |
| | LOCATED WITHIN THIS SETBACK RANGE. PLEASE CLEARLY |
| | ILLUSTRATE (WITH DIMENSIONS) TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. |
| | [ZLDR S.94-215] |
| | |
| | 4.) PER THE MU DISTRICT REGULATIONS, ALL LEVELS OF THE |
| | PARKING GARAGE SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW BY LINER |
| | USES ALONG PRIMARY AND SECONDARY STREETS. ACCORDING TO |
| | THE PLANS, THE REQUIREMENT HAS NOT BEEN MET ALONG |
| | BUTLER STREET, WHICH IS A SECONDARY A STREET. |
| | INFORMATION FOR TRANSPARENCY AND ACTIVE LINER DEPTH |
| | WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CMUD |
| | DISTRICT REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 5.) PLEASE CLARIFY THE ALLEYWAY CONNECTION WITHIN THE |
| | PROJECT. THERE APPEARS TO BE A CONNECTION UNDER THE |
| | BUILDING, WHICH DEFERS FROM THE PREAPPLICATION PLANS. |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE COULD BE CHALLENGES WITH THIS |
| | DESIGN: A) ACCESS AND SECURITY. B) MAINTENANCE |
| | RESPONSIBILITY. C) ACCESS EASEMENT. D) OVERHEAD |
| | CLEARANCE FOR SERVICE VEHICLES. |
| | |
| | 6.) AS MENTIONED BY STAFF IN THE PREAPPLICATION |
| | MEETING, IT IS IMPORTANT TO REACH OUT TO THE PUBLIC |
| | WORKS DEPARTMENT TO DETERMINE IF THE EXISTING ALLEY IS |
| | A SERVICE ALLEY AND IF IT IS NECESSARY TO BE MAINTAINED |
| | AND/OR IF OTHER ALTERNATIVES HAVE BEEN PRESENTED TO |
| | MAINTAIN SERVICE WITHIN THE ALLEY (IF APPLICABLE). HAS |
| | THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BEEN CONTACTED PRIOR TO THE |
| | FORMAL SUBMITTAL OF THIS APPLICATION? |
| | |
| | 7.) ALL VEHICULAR ACCESS POINTS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM |
| | WIDTH OF 24 FT. AT THE PROPERTY LINE. IT APPEARS THAT |
| | THIS MAXIMUM REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN EXCEEDED. |
| | |
| | 8.) A SITE PLAN SHEET, CONTAINING ALL REQUIRED |
| | INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN CHECKLIST |
| | (REFERENCE: PAGE 16 OF THE 2022 DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION) SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH ALL REQUIRED ZONING |
| | INFORMATION AND ALL NECESSARY DIMENSIONS ILLUSTRATED IN |
| | THE PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS (NOT PIECEMEAL OVER VARIOUS |
| | SHEETS). ADDITIONAL SHEETS MAY BE REQUIRED TO CLEARLY |
| | ILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 9.) THE BREAKDOWN OF THE OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS SHALL |
| | BE PROVIDED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE ARE SPECIFIC |
| | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CORE I AND TRANSITION |
| | SUB-DISTRICTS. |
| | |
| | 10.) PLEASE CLARIFY/CORRECT THE OVERALL LOT SIZE OF THE |
| | PROJECT. THERE SEEMS TO BE A DISCREPANCY WITH THE |
| | NUMBERS. |
| | |
| | 11.) PLEASE CLARIFY THE COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE |
| | PROPOSED FOR THE PROJECT. THE NUMBERS ARE INCONSISTENT |
| | IN THE PLAN SHEETS (I.E. 28,605 SQ. FT. VS. 28,500 SQ. |
| | FT.). |
| | |
| | 12.) CHECK THE UNIT MATRIX PER TOWER CALCULATIONS WITH |
| | THE PARKING INFORMATION TABULAR. THERE ARE |
| | INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE NUMBERS PROVIDED IN THE |
| | TABLES. |
| | |
| | 13.) A STALL PAINTING DETAIL IS REQUIRED. THE DETAIL |
| | SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARDS IN ZLDR |
| | S.94-485. |
| | |
| | 14.) LOADING ZONE CALCULATIONS AND INFORMATION HAVE NOT |
| | BEEN PROVIDED FOR THE PROJECT. PLEASE PROVIDE THE |
| | NECESSARY INFORMATION TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | THE LOADING REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS. ALSO, PLEASE |
| | LABEL THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE LOADING ZONES |
| | IN THE PLAN SET. |
| | |
| | 15.) THE RETAIL/COMMERCIAL PARKING CALCULATIONS ARE |
| | INCORRECT. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 16.) CHECK PROVIDED BICYCLE PARKING. THE NUMBER OF |
| | PARKING SPACES PROVIDED IN THE PLAN SHEETS DO NOT MATCH |
| | THE PROVIDED BICYCLE PARKING IN THE PARKING TABULAR. |
| | |
| | 17.) A BICYCLE RACK DETAIL IS REQUIRED IN THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 18.) A MINIMUM OF ONE SHOWER AND CHANGE FACILITY SHALL |
| | BE PROVIDED TO BE AVAILABLE FOR ALL TENANTS AND SHALL |
| | BE LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING, OR WITHIN 200 FT. OF |
| | THE BUILDING ENTRANCE FOR DEVELOPMENTS GREATER THAN |
| | 50,000 SQ. FT. IN GROSS BUILDING AREA. THIS FACILITY IS |
| | NOT PRESENT IN THE DESIGN. |
| | |
| | 19.) THERE APPEARS TO BE RETAINING WALLS ALONG THE |
| | PERIMETER OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE |
| | INFORMATION (I.E. HEIGHT, LOCATION, INTERACTION WITH |
| | SURROUNDING PUBLIC SPACES, ETC.) AND CLEARLY ILLUSTRATE |
| | IN THE PLANS HOW THE WALLS WILL MAINTAIN ACTIVITY AND |
| | INTERACTION WITH THE PUBLIC SPACE(S). ALSO, IT APPEARS |
| | THE RETAINING WALL GOES INTO THE FLAGLER DRIVE PARKWAY |
| | WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT OF THE PARKWAY AS IT |
| | PROVIDES A DIVISION FROM THE USE OF PUBLIC SPACE. |
| | |
| | 20.) CLEARLY SHOW THE SIDEWALK/PEDESTRIAN PATH ALONG |
| | THE PERIMETER OF THE PROJECT. PER THE CMUD REGULATIONS, |
| | A MINIMUM SIDEWALK WIDTH OF 5 FT. SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | ADJACENT TO THE REQUIRED 5 FT. WIDE LANDSCAPED AREA |
| | ALONG THE STREET EDGE. TREE GRATES MAY BE PROVIDED IN |
| | LIEU OF LANDSCAPED AREA IF ON-STREET PARKING IS |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 21.) ARE THERE ANY IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED ALONG THE EAST |
| | SIDE OF FLAGLER DRIVE AT THIS TIME? |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PLEASE CLEARLY SHOW AND LABEL THE FEMA APPROVED |
| | BASE ELEVATION + THE 2 FT. REQUIRED ELEVATION PER THE |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH BUILDING CODE. THE HEIGHT OF |
| | THE BUILDING SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THIS POINT TO THE |
| | TOP OF THE BUILDING. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT PER |
| | THE CMUD REGULATIONS SHALL NOT BE EXCEEDED. |
| | |
| | 2.) PROVIDE PLANAR BREAK CALCULATIONS. FOR BUILDING |
| | FRONTAGES GREATER THAN 150 FT., NO FA?ADE SHALL EXCEED |
| | 60% OF THE BUILDING FRONTAGE WITHOUT PROVIDING A PLANER |
| | BREAK OR MULTIPLE PLANAR BREAKS WITH A MINIMUM OF 3 FT. |
| | IN DEPTH. THE CUMULATIVE HORIZONTAL LENGTH OF ALL |
| | PLANAR BREAKS SHALL BE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 20% OF |
| | THE BUILDING FRONTAGE. [ZLDR S.94-209] |
| | |
| | 3.) THE HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES/ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES |
| | PROVIDED ON THE ROOFTOP HAVE NOT BEEN INCLUDED IN THE |
| | DRAWINGS. PLEASE NOTE THAT PROJECTIONS AND |
| | ENCROACHMENTS SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE MAXIMUM |
| | ALLOWANCES PROVIDED IN ZLDR S.94-209, TABLE VII-1] |
| | |
| | 4.) PLEASE CLARIFY/ PROVIDE NOTATIONS IN THE PLANS, |
| | ETC. THE PROPOSED ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT ALONG THE |
| | WALLS OF THE PARKING GARAGE (NON-ACTIVE USE). PER THE |
| | MU DISTRICT STANDARDS, A COMBINATION OF TWO OR MORE |
| | TREATMENTS SHALL BE INTEGRATED WITH THE DESIGN OF |
| | ADJACENT ACTIVE USE FACADES. |
| | |
| | 5..) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS PROPOSED FOR USE TO DEMONSTRATE |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDRS. THERE ARE CERTAIN MATERIALS |
| | THAT ARE RESTRICTED PER THE FENESTRATION STANDARDS OF |
| | THE MU DISTRICT STANDARDS (I.E. GLAZING). PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE THE APPROPRIATE NOTATIONS IN THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 6.) WILL THERE BE ACCESS TO THE GROUND LEVEL |
| | COMMERCIAL/RETAIL SPACE FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK? THERE |
| | DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE ANY DOORS THAT IMPLIES ACCESS. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE/ILLUSTRATE THIS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. |
| | THERE HAS TO BE A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF HOW THE SPACE |
| | WILL INTERACT WITH THE STREET. |
| | |
| | 7.) PLEASE ENSURE ALL ELEVATIONS MATCH FLOOR PLANS AND |
| | RENDERINGS. |
| | |
| | |
| | SIGNAGE COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) IS THERE SIGNAGE PROPOSED FOR THE PROJECT? IF NOT |
| | DETERMINED AT THIS TIME, A NOTE STATING THAT ALL |
| | SIGNAGE SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED IN THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE MINIMUM OF FOUR (4) |
| | PAPER COPIES (IN COLOR) AND ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 11 |
| | INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS |
| | AND DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |