| Date |
Text |
| 2022-08-25 14:44:49 | ZONING - ORIGINAL PPRC COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 1. PROPOSED MINOR SITE PLAN AMENDMENT TO ALTER THE |
| | LANDSCAPING ON THE PROPERTY WILL REQUIRE A NEW OR |
| | AMENDED MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT TO BE RECORDED/REPLACE |
| | THE EXISTING MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT, MAY REQUIRE |
| | APPROVAL AT CITY COMMISSSION. |
| | UNDERSTOOD. |
| | |
| | 8.25.22 REVIEW - [CONDITION OF APPROVAL] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2. PREVIOUS SITE PLAN APPROVAL HAD PROCEEDED THE FORMAL |
| | CODE REVISION TO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE |
| | REQUIREMENTS UNDER ORD. 4885-19, WHICH ALLOWED |
| | SUBSTITUTION OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE FOR PRIVATE OPEN |
| | SPACE WITH/UNDER SPECIFIC PARAMETERS. AT THE TIME OF |
| | APPROVAL, STAFF HAD ALLOWED SUBSTITUTION OF PUBLIC OPEN |
| | SPACES TO MEET THE REQUIREMENT FOR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. |
| | AS IT WAS BUILT, THE PREVIOUS APPROVAL IS NOT COMPLIANT |
| | UNDER THE NEW CODE REQUIREMENTS. AS SUCH, ANY CHANGES |
| | TO THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ON THE GROUND FLOOR (SIZE, |
| | TYPOLOGY, ETC.) SHALL REMAIN WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF |
| | WHAT WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED, OTHERWISE ANY CHANGED |
| | CONDITIONS MAY TRIGGER A DOWNTOWN ACTION COMMITTEE |
| | (DAC) APPROVAL OR VARIANCE. |
| | THE PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE FRONT ENTRY ARE NOW |
| | LIMITED TO THE EXTENTS OF THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED |
| | GROUND FLOOR OPEN SPACE WHICH WAS CLASSIFIED AS A |
| | GARDEN PLAZA. THE GREY SHADED AREA ON SHEETS L2, L3, |
| | L6, AND L8 REPRESENT THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BOUNDARY |
| | OF THE GARDEN PLAZA OPEN SPACE. WE ARE NOW PROVIDING |
| | THE REQUIRED BENCH SEATING AND LANDSCAPE AREA WITHIN |
| | THIS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BOUNDARY. SHEET L2 LISTS THE |
| | ITEMS THAT ARE REQUIRED AND PROPOSED FOR THIS REVISED |
| | GROUND FLOOR OPEN AREA. |
| | |
| | 8.25.22 REVIEW - [NOT SATISFIED] - PUBLIC OPEN SPACE |
| | (GARDEN PLAZA) ALONG GROUND LEVEL IS CORRECTLY |
| | ILLUSTRATED AND MEETS THE 475SF DIMENSION OF THE |
| | PREVIOUS APPROVAL HOWEVER, TABULAR DATA AND |
| | CALCULATIONS ON SHEET L2 ARE LABELED INCORRECTLY. |
| | THE MINIMUM REQUIRED TREE CANOPY AREA IS 50% BUT THE |
| | CALCULATION IS BASED UPON THE TYPE OF TREE PROVIDED IN |
| | TABLE IV-8, IN THIS CASE THE LARGE LIVE OAK PROVIDES |
| | 500 SF OF CANOPY CREDIT. EXISTING TREE COUNTS TOWARD |
| | THE REQUIREMENT/PROVIDED CATEGORY. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3. PLEASE CLARIFY THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TYPES AND HOW |
| | REQUIREMENTS/CALCULATIONS ARE MET PER THE SPACE. |
| | AN OPEN SPACE TABLE HAS BEEN ADDED TO SHEET L2 SHOWING |
| | THE OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS AND DESIGNATIONS FROM THE |
| | ORIGINAL BUILDING APPROVAL. I HAVE INCLUDED A |
| | DESCRIPTION OF THE EXTENT OF WORK THAT IS PROPOSED IN |
| | THE EXISTING OPEN SPACES. SHEET L2 INCLUDES TABLES |
| | SHOWING WHAT IS REQUIRED AND PROPOSED FOR EACH OPEN |
| | SPACE. |
| | |
| | 8.25.22 REVIEW - [NOT SATISFIED] - PRIVATE OPEN SPACES |
| | NOT PROPERLY IDENTIFIED, 'AMENITY DECK' NOT TYPE OF |
| | PRIVATE OPEN SPACE PER CODE. PREVIOUS APPROVAL HAD |
| | CATEGORIZED THE 4TH FLOOR PRIVATE OPEN SPACES AS A |
| | 'TERRACE'. IF THIS SPACE IS REMAINING AS A TERRACE, |
| | PLEASE IDENTIFY, LABEL, AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS THAT |
| | THE PROPOSED CHANGES MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS |
| | PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TYPE. IF SPACE TYPE IS AMENDED |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY AND PROVIDE TABULAR DATA. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 4. PLEASE CLARIFY THE GROUND-LEVEL PUBLIC OPEN SPACE |
| | TYPE AND HOW REQUIREMENTS/CALCULATIONS ARE MET PER THE |
| | SPACE. OPEN SPACE CANNOT BE WITHIN THE REQUIRED |
| | SETBACKS FOR THE PROPERTY. PLEASE KEEP WITHIN |
| | PARAMETERS OF WHAT WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (SEE COMMENT |
| | #2). |
| | |
| | 8.25.22 REVIEW - SEE RESPONSE TO ITEM #2 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 5. PLEASE ADDRESS ANY REMAINING CONCERNS RAY ? SENIOR |
| | LANDSCAPE PLANNER MAY HAVE REGARDING: ELEVATION OF ROW |
| | CONDITION IN RELATION TO PLANT HEIGHTS AND SITE |
| | VISIBILITY, REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT SPECIES, STRUCTURAL |
| | SOIL IN RELATION TO THE PAVED AND PLANTING AREAS, ETC. |
| | UNDERSTOOD. |
| | |
| | 8.25.22 REVIEW - [ACKNOWLEDGED] PENDING LANDSCAPE |
| | REVIEW. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS - 8.25.22 |
| | |
| | 1. TWO BIKE RACKS ARE REMOVED FROM THE STREETSCAPE |
| | ALONG OLIVE AVE. DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM THE GROUND-LEVEL |
| | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. PLEASE INDICATE WHERE THE REQUIRED |
| | RACKS ARE RELOCATED ALONG THIS STREET FRONTAGE. |
| | REQUIREMENT IS 1 SPACE PER EVERY 100 FT. OF FRONTAGE. |
| | |
| | 2. THE SIDEWALK AREA AT THE CORNER OF THE NEW PUBLIC |
| | OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPING REDUCES THE SIDEWALK WIDTH, THIS |
| | NEEDS TO BE MAINTAINED TO AN AT LEAST 8FT. CLEAR PATH. |
| | |
| | CHRIS KIMMERLY, AICP |
| | URBAN DESIGN PLANNER |
| | 822.1426 [email protected] |
| |
Print |
