| Date |
Text |
| 2023-02-02 13:54:50 | APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: |
| | 1) PROVIDE ALL MISSING SIDEWALK AND/OR WALKWAY |
| | DIMENSIONS, INCLUSIVE OF EFFECTIVE WALKABLE AREA, |
| | LANDSCAPE AND ANY OTHER FEATURE(S) THAT COULD BE |
| | AFFECTING PEDESTRIANS. SEVERAL ARE MISSING IN THE |
| | TRANSPORTATION PLAN |
| | 2) PLEASE KEEP IN MIND THAT MINIMUM-WIDTH AS MENTIONED |
| | IN CITY CODE MEANS THAT THE SIDEWALK CAN BE WIDER THAN |
| | THE STANDARD. ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING AN OVERALL |
| | REDUCTION OF SIDEWALK WIDTH FROM EXISTING CONDITIONS TO |
| | THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. CONSIDERING THE POTENTIAL |
| | HIGH PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC, IT WOULD BE REASONABLE TO KEEP |
| | A MINIMUM OF 7-FEET AROUND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, |
| | WHERE POSSIBLE |
| | 3) INSTALL SOLAR POWERED LED FLASHING STOP SIGNS ON |
| | 24TH ST AT THE SPRUCE AVE INTERSECTION |
| | |
| | |
| | PAST COMMENTS: |
| | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE AVAILABLE |
| | 2) SATISFIED. SETUP A METHODOLOGY MEETING WITH THE |
| | CITY???S TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING GROUP |
| | 3) SATISFIED. AT THE MINIMUM, THE ANALYSIS MUST BE |
| | REVISED TO INCLUDE TRIPS GENERATED BY THE RESIDENTIAL |
| | PORTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | 4) SATISFIED. DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE ANALYSIS, |
| | TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES SHALL |
| | BE PROPOSED, DISCUSSED AND IMPLEMENTED ACCORDINGLY |
| | 5) SATISFIED. THE ALLEY IS TOO NARROW TO ACCOMMODATE |
| | THE INCREASE IN VEHICULAR TRIPS |
| | 6) SATISFIED. ALLEYWAY WILL BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY |
| | EASTBOUND. ANALYSIS SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY. |
| | FIGURE 4 SHOWS VEHICLES EXITING THE ALLEY IN THE |
| | WESTBOUND DIRECTION. SHOWCASED SITE PLAN A1 DOES NOT |
| | MATCH LATEST RESUBMISSION, PLEASE REPLACE IT WITH T1.0 |
| | 7) SATISFIED. THE UPDATED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DOES NOT |
| | CONSIDER THE RESIDENTIAL VOLUMES WITH RESPECT TO TEST 1 |
| | AND TEST 2. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 8) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN |
| | SHOWCASING ALL TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY, |
| | DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, |
| | DRIVEWAY, GATES, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, ETC.) |
| | PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. SHEET A1.0 IS A GOOD |
| | STARTING POINT. PLEASE INCLUDE AND MERGE ALL THE |
| | TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION FROM BOTH CIVIL AND |
| | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS INTO A SINGLE SHEET. EITHER CALL |
| | THE SHEET T1.0 OR TITLE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN. |
| | SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING THROUGHOUT. |
| | 9) SATISFIED. IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, PLEASE |
| | SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, |
| | AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS |
| | SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | 10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE |
| | TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES |
| | CLEARLY DEFINED. CURRENT ANALYSIS IS NOT PROPER FROM A |
| | GRAPHICAL POINT OF VIEW; MOREOVER, THERE IS |
| | ENCROACHMENT BETWEEN TRUCK PATH AND PARKING STALLS ON |
| | 24TH ST. PLEASE USE COLORS FOR EACH OF THE PATHS. |
| | ANALYSIS NEEDS TO BE RE-RERUN ACCORDING TO SITE PLAN |
| | REVISION(S) THAT MAY IMPACT THE ROUTE, SPECIFICALLY: |
| | THE SIDEWALK ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE ALLEYWAY. |
| | MOREOVER, PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR A DELIVERY |
| | TRUCK MANEUVERING IN AND OUT OF THE LOADING ZONE. |
| | PLEASE USE DIFFERENT COLORS FOR VEHICLE WHEEL-PATH AND |
| | ITS DYNAMIC ENVELOPE, SANITATION TRUCK SHOWS SEVERAL |
| | ENCROACHMENTS. LATEST SUBMISSION DOES NOT HAVE |
| | DIFFERENT COLORS FOR THE DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND WHEEL |
| | PATHS; MOREOVER, ENCROACHMENTS ARE STILL SHOWN IN EX1 |
| | AND EX2. |
| | 11) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY |
| | ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 |
| | FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. MORE |
| | SPECIFICS ON THE ELECTRIFICATION: A CONDUIT (2-INCH |
| | SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL |
| | PULL BOX (240V ??? 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE. |
| | SHEET A1.0 DOES NOT SEEM TO SHOW THE AREA, PLEASE |
| | SPECIFY ITS LOCATION IN YOUR COMMENT RESPONSE |
| | 12) SATISFIED. DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN |
| | VEHICULAR TRAFFIC, UNLESS WIDENED TO A MINIMUM OF 20 |
| | FEET, THE ALLEY MUST BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY BETWEEN |
| | BROADWAY AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. DIRECTIONALITY |
| | SHALL BE DECIDED IN COORDINATION WITH SANITATION/PUBLIC |
| | WORKS. EASTBOUND DIRECTIONALITY HAS BEEN CHOSEN. |
| | SHOWCASE THE 15 FEET WIDTH ON THE TRANSPORTATION SITE |
| | PLAN, BASED ON THE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS IT DOES NOT SEEM |
| | TO BE AS WIDE |
| | 13) SATISFIED. IF ANY PEDESTRIAN ACCESS OR ACTIVITIES |
| | ARE EXPECTED ALONG THE ALLEY, A SIDEWALK MUST BE |
| | INSTALLED. OTHERWISE INSTALL A WALL/FENCE OR BOLLARDS |
| | ALONG THE YARD AREA FOR SAFETY PURPOSES. |
| | 14) SATISFIED. WIDTH OF THE DRIVEWAY ON 24TH ST CANNOT |
| | EXCEED 25 FEET. SHEET A2.0 CURRENTLY SHOWS 32 FEET |
| | 15) SATISFIED. MAXIMUM SLOPE ON PARKING RAMPS CANNOT |
| | EXCEED 6%. SHEET A2.0 CURRENTLY SHOWS VALUES BETWEEN |
| | 6.1 TO 6.3 % |
| | 16) SATISFIED. PROVIDE MORE DETAILS OF THE PARKING DECK |
| | IN SHEET A4.0 AND A5.0. A TURNAROUND SPACE MUST BE |
| | PROVIDED AT THE DEAD-END OF THE GARAGE. PROVIDE |
| | DIMENSIONS FOR THE PARKING STALLS ADJACENT TO A WALL OR |
| | OBSTRUCTIONS. PER CITY CODE SEC94-111(C)(1): ???IN |
| | THOSE CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO |
| | A WALL, FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION, |
| | THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE |
| | FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF |
| | THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A |
| | MINIMUM OF TWO FEET.??? |
| | 17) SATISFIED. PER THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN, SPRUCE |
| | AVE IS DESIGNATED AS A BICYCLE BOULEVARD. INSTALL |
| | SHARROW MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE ACCORDINGLY ALONG THE |
| | SECTION FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | 18) SATISFIED. IN THE PARKING TABLE INCLUDE THE NUMBER |
| | OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BICYCLE STALLS |
| | 19) SATISFIED. CLEARLY INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE |
| | BIKE RACKS IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN |
| | 20) SATISFIED. BASED ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE |
| | COMMERCIAL RETAIL PORTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, |
| | A 10 X 25 FEET LOADING ZONE MUST BE PROVIDED. CLEARLY |
| | MARK AND DIMENSION THE LOCATION OF SUCH ZONE IN THE |
| | TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN |
| | 21) SATISFIED. THE WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK ON THE WEST |
| | SIDE ALONG 25TH ST IS NARROWED BY A LANDSCAPE ISLAND, |
| | PLEASE MODIFY IT FOR SAKE OF SIDEWALK WIDTH CONTINUITY |
| | 22) SATISFIED. INSTALL STOP SIGN AND STOP BAR AT THE |
| | ALLEY EXIT ON 24TH ST |
| | 23) SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOWCASE ALL REQUIRED AND |
| | PROPOSED PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNS IN THE |
| | TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN. REFER TO OTHER COMMENTS |
| | PERTAINING MISSING OR REQUESTED DIMENSIONS, MARKINGS |
| | AND SIGNAGE |
| | 24) SATISFIED. THE EAST END OF THE ALLEY FACING THE |
| | GARAGE ENTRANCE IS APPROXIMATELY 28-FEET WIDE, PLEASE |
| | INSTALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SO TO PROVIDE TWO TRAVEL |
| | LANES, ONE STRAIGHT- ONLY ALIGNED WITH GARAGE ENTRANCE, |
| | THE OTHER RIGHT-TURN-ONLY FOR TURNING VEHICLES. INSTALL |
| | STOP BARS AND SIGNAGE ACCORDINGLY. SEPARATE THE TWO |
| | TRAVEL LANES WITH A CHEVRON-STYLED PAVEMENT MARKED |
| | DIVIDING ISLAND |
| | 25) SATISFIED. INSTALL DO-NOT-ENTER SIGNS ON BOTH SIDES |
| | OF THE EAST END OF THE ALLEY FACING THE GARAGE ENTRANCE |
| | 26) SATISFIED. INSTALL AND SHOW IN THE T1.0 ONE-WAY |
| | SIGNAGE AT THE WEST END OF THE ALLEY (BOTH SIDES) AND |
| | AT EACH LOCATION WHERE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES DRIVEWAYS |
| | ACCESS THE ALLEY |
| | 27) TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMIT. PROVIDE A |
| | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE REFER TO CITY CODE |
| | 86-246 FOR DETAILS |
| | 28) NOT SATISFIED. EXISTING SIDEWALK WALKABLE AREA |
| | ALONG SPRUCE AVE IS BETWEEN 7 AND 13-FEET. PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT IS REDUCING IT TO 6-FEET. PLEASE REVISE, |
| | CLEARLY DIMENSION, AND PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 7-FEET |
| | WALKABLE AREA ACCORDINGLY. SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS ARE |
| | MISSING THROUGHOUT THE T1 SITE PLAN |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
