| Date |
Text |
| 2023-02-08 12:32:26 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE |
| | 1/19/2023 PPRC SUBMITTAL. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED COMMENTS |
| | ARE NOT INCLUDED. |
| | |
| | 10. [SATISFIED - EOR TO RESOLVE PRIOR TO ENGINEERING |
| | PERMIT SUBMITTAL.] CHECK THE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS AT THE |
| | BASE OF THE STEPS FOR THE UNITS ALONG 25TH STREET VS. |
| | THE EXISTING BACK OF SIDEWALK ELEVATION. SOME PROPOSED |
| | ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO BE BELOW THE BOW OR MORE THAN 1 |
| | INCH ABOVE THE BOW. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS (8/4/2022 SUBMITTAL): |
| | |
| | 13. [SATISFIED ??? ALL STORM PIPES WITHIN THE R/W SHOWN |
| | TO BE 15-INCHES] JUSTIFY ALL OUTFALL PIPE DIAMETERS |
| | LARGER THAN 15 INCH. THIS INFORMATION CAN BE PROVIDED |
| | WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 19. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? NEED GRADES FOR THE |
| | CORNERS OF THE BULBOUT CREATED FOR THE ALLEY ACCESS |
| | EASEMENT.] PROVIDE GRADES AROUND THE NEW ALLEY ENTRANCE |
| | ON 24TH ST. |
| | |
| | 20. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - LABEL ALL EXISTING UTILITIES |
| | ON THE PAVING AND GRADING, THE DRAINAGE AND THE WATER |
| | AND WASTEWATER PLAN SHEETS. SHALL BE ADDRESSED FOR |
| | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.] LABEL (SIZE AND |
| | MATERIAL) EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. |
| | |
| | 21. [SATISFIED] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS |
| | AND COORDINATE THE LANDSCAPING AND UTILITY PLANS. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS (12/21/22 SUBMITTAL): |
| | 22. [SATISFIED] REVIEW SPOT GRADE OF 16.40 FT NAVD AT |
| | NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE DEVELOPMENT. THIS GRADE IS ONE |
| | FOOT HIGHER THAN THE FFE. COMMENT CAN BE ADDRESSED AT |
| | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 23. [NOT SATISFIED ??? SHALL BE ADDRESSED WITH THE |
| | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] REVIEW EXISTING SPOT |
| | GRADES ALONG THE NORTH CURB LINE OF 24TH ST, WEST OF |
| | THE ALLEY DRIVEWAY. THERE IS A 2.5+ FEET DROP ACROSS |
| | THE PARKING SPACE (15.71 TO 13.08 FT NAVD). |
| | |
| | 24. [NOT SATISFIED ??? SHALL BE ADDRESSED WITH THE |
| | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] PROPOSED ALLEY DRIVEWAY |
| | BULBOUT WILL INTERRUPT/BLOCK THE DRAINAGE FLOW WEST OF |
| | THE DRIVEWAY. |
| | |
| | 25. [SATISFIED] SECTION A FOR THE ALLEY R/W (SHED |
| | SECTION) DOES NOT MATCH THE GRADING PLAN FOR THE ALLEY |
| | (INVERTED CROWN) OR MATCH THE PROPOSED SPOT GRADES. |
| | |
| | 26. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THE |
| | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] SECTION C SHOWS THE ALLEY |
| | PAVEMENT SLOPING TO THE RIGHT (OR NORTH). THE GRADING |
| | PLAN INDICATES THE ALLEY WILL SLOPE TO THE SOUTH. |
| | |
| | 27. [SATISFIED] SECTION E - PROVIDE STEEPER CROSS SLOPE |
| | (0.5% MIN. ) FOR 10 FT WIDE SIDEWALK TO PROMOTE |
| | DRAINAGE. THE SPOT GRADES WILL CREATE A 0.1% CROSS |
| | SLOPE. INDICATE WHAT THE 15.62 SPOT GRADE IS FOR. THESE |
| | COMMENTS CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT |
| | SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 28. SECTION F - |
| | A. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? CONFIRM THE DISTANCE IS 10 |
| | INCHES OR 10 FEET] LABEL THE R/W LINE AND THE DISTANCE |
| | FROM THE BACK OF CURB. |
| | B. [SATISFIED] SECTION ARROWS FACING THE WRONG |
| | DIRECTION. |
| | C. [SATISFIED ??? NOTE THE BUILDING CODE REQUIRES THE |
| | SURFACE ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING TO SLOPE AWAY FROM THE |
| | BUILDING] IS THE BERM NECESSARY ALONG THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 29. [NOT SATISFIED ??? SHALL BE ADDRESSED DURING |
| | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] ADD THE FOLLOWING LINE |
| | TYPES TO THE SHEET LEGEND: H2O, ELEC, FO, SAN AND ANY |
| | OTHER LINETYPES THAT APPEAR ON THE PLANS. THIS CAN BE |
| | ADDRESSED DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | CONDITIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL: |
| | 1. DEVELOPER TO BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE DRAINAGE |
| | SYSTEM IN THE ALLEY EASEMENT. |
| | |
| | 2. GRADING OF PUBLIC ALLEY IS TO BLEND IN WITH THE |
| | ADJOINING PROPERTIES WITHOUT ADDING ADDITIONAL RUNOFF |
| | TO THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES OR PREVENTING EXISTING |
| | RUNOFF FROM THE PROPERTIES. ANY DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE |
| | INSTALLED TO SATISFY THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL BE THE |
| | RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER TO MAINTAIN. AVOID THE |
| | INSTALLATION OF RAISED CURBING, WHICH WILL NARROW THE |
| | AVAILABLE TRAVEL WIDTH IN THE ALLEY. |
| | |
| | 3. CURB RAMPS TO BE RE-CONSTRUCTED TO MEET CURRENT ADA |
| | STANDARDS IF THE ASPHALT ADJACENT TO THE RAMP IS |
| | MODIFIED IN ANY WAY. |
| | |
| | 4. ALLEY ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT LINES TO BE SHOWN |
| | ON ALL OF THE ENGINEERING PLAN SHEETS. |
| | |
| | 5. PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE |
| | 24TH STREET RIGHT OF WAY TO BE APPROVED BY FDOT. THE |
| | DISRUPTION OF THE GUTTER FLOW BY THE ALLEY EASEMENT |
| | DRIVEWAY BULBOUT IS TO BE RECTIFIED. |
| | |
| | TRACY WARD, PE |
| | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | 561-494-1120 (O) |
| | 561-351-0510 (M) |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
