Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z22060030
Project Number Z22060030
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 4
Notes
Date Text
2023-01-05 16:06:351/5/23 ??? FAILED
  
  
 PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS:
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
 RESUBMITTING:
 A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
 B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
 WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
 C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
 D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
 AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.
  
 REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
 F. PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER FROM COMCAST CABLE
 COMMUNICATIONS CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT
 DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE
 INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES.
 [SATISFIED]
 G. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE
 STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [NOT
 SATISFIED]
 H. PLEASE PROVIDE A PRE-DETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE
 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE SUBJECT
 PROJECT. [SATISFIED]
 I. PLEASE SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A
 VARIANCE BY THE PLANNING BOARD, FOR THE REQUESTED
 VARIANCE. [SATISFIED]
 J. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
 COMMENTS BELOW. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 K. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.
 [SATISFIED]
  
 PLANS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
 1. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE EXISTING LAND USE AND
 FUTURE LAND USE IN THE ???SITE DATA??? TABLE ON SHEET
 A0.1. [SATISFIED]
 2. PLEASE SPECIFY THE PROPOSED
 ???COMMERCIAL/RETAIL/CO-WORKING SPACE??? USES ACCORDING
 TO THE USES LISTED IN TABLE VII-9 (FOUND IN THE
 CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR)
 SUBSECTION 94-210(J)) IN THE ???SITE DATA??? TABLE ON
 SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED PER RESPONSE PROVIDED]
 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPERTY LINE AND
 EXISTING/PROPOSED EASEMENTS ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS.
 [SATISFIED]
 4. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-209(J)(1)(A), THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL DIMENSION OF A
 BUILDING SHALL BE 300 FEET. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE
 THE DIFFERENT PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
 5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED BUILDING TYPE
 ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
 6. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-209(2)(A),
 A COURTYARD BUILDING TYPE IS DEFINED AS A BUILDING
 CHARACTERIZED AS HAVING A CENTRAL OPEN SPACE THAT IS
 OPEN TO THE SKY AND ENCLOSED BY HABITABLE SPACE ON AT
 LEAST THREE SIDES. THEREFORE, IF YOU ARE PROPOSING A
 COURTYARD BUILDING, THEN PLEASE REFER TO FIGURES VII-7
 AND VII-8 (FOUND IN ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(F)(5)) AND
 REVISE THE DIFFERENT
 PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [WITHDRAWN]
 7. IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE VII-8 (FOUND IN THE ZLDR
 SUBSECTION 94-210(I)(3)), THE MAXIMUM LOT WIDTH IS 200
 FEET FOR A COURTYARD BUILDING. THEREFORE, IF YOU ARE
 PROPOSING A COURTYARD BUILDING OR ANY OTHER BUILDING
 TYPE, THEN PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 8. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE
 MINIMUM/MAXIMUM/PROPOSED LOT WIDTH, MINIMUM/PROPOSED
 LOT DEPTH, MAXIMUM/PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA,
 MINIMUM/PROPOSED LOT AREA, AND MINIMUM/PROPOSED
 PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
 9. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE DENSITY CALCULATION ON
 SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
 10. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PERCENTAGES OF
 LANDSCAPING FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND PROPOSED ROOFTOP
 TERRACE ON SHEET A0.1 AND LANDSCAPING PLANS.
 [SATISFIED]
 11. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED ???EAST
 ELEVATION??? FROM ???SPRUCE AVENUE??? SETBACK (AS
 REFLECTED ON SHEET A1.0) IN THE ???SETBACKS??? TABLE ON
 SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
 12. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-209(2)(A), A BUILDING FRONTAGE IS DEFINED AS THE
 PERCENTAGE OF A BUILDING FA??ADE THAT IS GENERALLY
 PARALLEL TO, FACING, OR ORIENTED TOWARD A STREET AND
 THAT LIES WITHIN THE MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM SETBACK AREA
 ALLOWED AND SHALL INCLUDE A PRINCIPAL BUILDING, WITH
 ACTIVE USES OR COLONNADES. THEREFORE, PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED BUILDING FRONTAGES IN
 THE ???SETBACKS??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
 13. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-209(J)(1)(G)(2), STOREFRONTS SHALL BE DIRECTLY
 ACCESSIBLE FROM A STREET FRONTAGE, URBAN GREENWAY OR
 PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC OR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. THE
 IDENTIFIED ???NON-RES ACTIVE USE (CO-WORK SPACE)??? AND
 ???NON-RES ACTIVE USE (RESIDENT FITNESS)??? DO NOT
 DEMONSTRATE DIRECT ACCESS FROM A STREET FRONTAGE, URBAN
 GREENWAY OR PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC OR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE.
 THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
 PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 14. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-209(J)(1)(G)(5), GROUND FLOOR WINDOW SILLS SHALL BE
 PLACED AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 24 INCHES ABOVE GRADE. IT
 HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR
 WINDOW SILLS ARE LOCATED AT OR ABOVE 30 INCHES.
 THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
 ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 15. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-209(2)(A), OPEN SPACE IS DEFINED AS AN IMPROVED
 OUTDOOR AREA OPEN TO THE SKY. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED
 THAT SOME OF THE PROPOSED OPEN SPACE AREAS ARE NOT OPEN
 TO THE SKY, SO PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
 16. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-210(K)(1)(B), THE MINIMUM SIZE OF A NEW DEDICATED
 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TEN PERCENT OF
 THE LOT AREA. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
 PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
 17. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-210(K)(1)(C), NEW DEDICATED PUBLIC OPEN SPACES SHALL
 BE PROVIDED AT GRADE LEVEL. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE
 THE DIFFERENT PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
 18. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-210(K)(1)(F), FENCES, WALLS AND HEDGES ARE PERMITTED
 AROUND THE PERIMETER OF A NEW DEDICATED PUBLIC OPEN
 SPACE AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES, PROVIDED THE
 ENCLOSURE DOES NOT PROHIBIT PUBLIC ACCESS AND MUST BE
 CONSTRUCTED OF A DECORATIVE MATERIAL. THEREFORE, PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION AND HEIGHT
 OF THE PROPOSED FENCE(S) ON THE DIFFERENT
 PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
 19. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-210(K)(1)(G), THE DEVELOPER/PROPERTY OWNER MUST
 ENTER INTO A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY FOR
 THE DEDICATED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. [WITHDRAWN]
 20. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-210(K)(2)(A), SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL ONLY BE
 PERMITTED WHERE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS ARE ON THE
 GROUND FLOOR. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
 PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
 21. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-210(K)(2)(C), SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL ABUT
 SIDEWALK AND BE VISIBLE FROM THE STREET. THEREFORE,
 PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [WITHDRAWN]
 22. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-210(K)(4), PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
 PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY, FOR
 THE PROPOSED PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACES.
 [WITHDRAWN]
 23. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(L),
 PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, TO
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE REQUIRED STREET
 FURNISHINGS AND LANDSCAPING ALONG 24TH STREET AND
 SPRUCE AVENUE. [SATISFIED]
 24. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-210(M)(2)(D), PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT
 PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [WITHDRAWN]
 25. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-210(M)(3), PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE DIMENSIONS
 OF THE EXISTING/PROPOSED SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPE
 STRIP/TREE GRATES, CURB/GUTTER, ON-STREET PARKING, AND
 RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 26. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-209(2)(D)(2) FOR THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK CROSSING THE
 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 27. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(O),
 PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED NUMBER OF
 DISABLED PARKING SPACES ON THE ???PARKING??? TABLE ON
 SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
 28. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(O),
 PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES IN THE
 ???PARKING??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
 29. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-210(O)(1)(II), PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE
 THE REQUIRED SHOWER AND CHANGING FACILITY ON THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
 30. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-209(2)(E)(2)(B)(I), THE PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE
 SHALL BE SCREENED ALONG ALL BUILDING FA??ADES FACING A
 RIGHT-OF-WAY OR OPEN SPACE BY A LINER BUILDING
 CONTAINING A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 20 FEET OF HABITABLE
 SPACE. THE VARIANCE REQUEST FOR THIS REQUIREMENT IS
 ACKNOWLEDGED, BUT AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A
 VARIANCE BY THE PLANNING BOARD NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED
 FOR THE SUBJECT VARIANCE REQUEST. [SATISFIED]
 31. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE DIMENSIONS
 OF THE PROPOSED OFF-STREET PARKING STALL DEPTHS ON THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 32. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-210(N)(3), PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE
 REQUIRED/PROPOSED GUEST PARKING ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 33. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-210(P)(4), THE SIGN BAND SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE
 FIRST TWO STORIES OF THE BUILDING. THEREFORE, PLEASE
 REVISE THE DIFFERENT
 PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 34. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-210(P)(4)(D), MURALS THAT ARE PAINTED DIRECTLY ONTO
 A FA??ADE REQUIRE THE SUBMITTAL OF A BUILDING PERMIT TO
 THE CITY. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
 35. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS OF
 VEHICLE/BICYCLE PARKING (STANDARD, COMPACT, ADA), ADA
 RAMPS, DRIVEWAYS, DUMPSTERS AND SIGNS. [SATISFIED]
  
 ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
 {I. ??? UPDATED} PLEASE SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR
 APPROVAL OF WAIVERS AND VARIANCES BY THE PLANNING
 BOARD, FOR THE REQUESTED WAIVERS AND VARIANCES.
 [SATISFIED]
 {4. ??? UPDATED} IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-209(J)(1)(A) FOLLOWING THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO.
 4963-21, THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL DIMENSION OF A BUILDING
 SHALL BE 250 FEET. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED - HOWEVER, VARIANCE REQUEST
 ACKNOWLEDGED]
 36. PLEASE PROVIDE CONSISTENT INFORMATION REGARDING THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING TYPE, HEIGHT, AND PERVIOUS AND
 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS ON THE ???SITE DATA??? ON SHEET
 A0.1, ???ELEVATIONS??? SHEETS A6.0 THROUGH A8.0, AND
 ???LANDSCAPE PLAN ??? SITE DATA??? SHEET L2.
 [SATISFIED]
 37. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE WHETHER THE PROPOSED
 BUILDING TYPE IS A ???LINER??? OR ???FLEX??? BUILDING
 TYPE ON SHEETS A0.1 AND L2. [SATISFIED]
 38. PLEASE CORRECT THE EXISTING LAND USE TO VACANT IN
 THE ???SITE DATA??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
 39. PLEASE CORRECT THE INDICATED MINIMUM LOT AREA IN
 THE ???LOT STANDARDS??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1 ACCORDING
 TO THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(I)(3). [SATISFIED]
 40. PLEASE CORRECT THE INDICATED REQUIRED MINIMUM AND
 PROVIDED PERVIOUS PERCENTAGES AND THE REQUIRED MAXIMUM
 IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE IN THE ???SITE LANDSCAPING???
 TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
 41. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROVIDED ???SOUTH
 ELEVATION??? FROM ???24TH STREET??? PARKING GROUND
 SETBACK (AS REFLECTED ON SHEET A1.0 AND IN THE
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT FOR THE ???V3??? REQUEST) IN
 THE ???SETBACKS??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
 42. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROVIDED ???WEST
 ELEVATION??? FROM ???ADJACENT PROPERTY??? RESIDENTIAL
 GROUND SETBACK (AS REFLECTED ON SHEET A1.0) IN THE
 ???SETBACKS??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1. [SATISFIED]
 43. PLEASE REVISE ???BUILDING ELEVATION ??? WEST??? AND
 ???BUILDING ELEVATION ??? SOUTH 01??? ON THE
 ???ELEVATIONS??? SHEET A7.0 TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-209(2)(J)(1)(H)(I)(5).
 [SATISFIED]
 44. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED HEIGHTS OF
 THE DEMONSTRATED ROOFTOP COVERED STRUCTURES AND
 MECHANICAL ROOMS AND EQUIPMENT ON THE ELEVATIONS.
 [SATISFIED]
 45. PLEASE PROVIDE CONSISTENT INFORMATION REGARDING THE
 PROPOSED PARKING IN THE ???PARKING??? TABLE ON SHEET
 A0.1 AND THE ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET A1.0, ???1ST FLOOR
 PLAN??? SHEET A2.0, ???2ND - 5TH FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET
 A3.0, AND ???6TH FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET A4.0. [SATISFIED]
 46. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF GUEST PARKING
 SPACES IN THE ???PARKING??? TABLE ON SHEET A0.1.
 [SATISFIED]
 47. ON THE ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET A1.0 AND ???1ST FLOOR
 PLAN??? SHEET A2.0, THE
 IDENTIFIED/INDICATED/DEMONSTRATED PROPOSED NUMBER OF
 GUEST PARKING SPACES EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED NUMBER
 OF GUEST PARKING SPACES ACCORDING TO THE ZLDR
 SUBSECTION 94-210(N)(3), THEREFORE PLEASE REVISE,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 48. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
 PARKING SPACES FOR THE PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL USES
 AND THE WALKWAY/PATHWAY FROM THOSE PROPOSED PARKING
 SPACES TO THE PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ON THE
 ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET A1.0, ???1ST FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET
 A2.0, ???2ND - 5TH FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET A3.0, AND ???6TH
 FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET A4.0. [SATISFIED]
 49. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
 PARKING SPACES ABUTTING WALLS/COLUMNS, AT MINIMUM, ONE
 (1) FOOT WIDER ON THE ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET A1.0,
 ???1ST FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET A2.0, ???2ND - 5TH FLOOR
 PLAN??? SHEET A3.0, AND ???6TH FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET
 A4.0. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
 50. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A TURN AROUND
 SPACE BEFORE THE PROPOSED VEHICLE ACCESS GATE ON THE
 1ST LEVEL OF THE PARKING GARAGE ON THE ???SITE PLAN???
 SHEET A1.0 AND ???1ST FLOOR PLAN??? SHEET A2.0.
 [SATISFIED]
 51. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE BICYCLE
 PARKING FACILITIES CLOSER TO THE PROPOSED
 NON-RESIDENTIAL USE (???FUTURE RETAIL???) ON THE
 ???SITE PLAN??? SHEET A1.0 AND ???1ST FLOOR PLAN???
 SHEET A2.0. [SATISFIED]
 52. PLEASE PROVIDE A ZOOM-IN/BLOW-UP VISUAL OF THE
 PROPOSED BIKE STORAGE ROOM WITH THE DETAILS/DIMENSIONS
 OF THE PROPOSED BICYCLE PARKING FACILITIES. [SATISFIED]
 53. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(M)(3)(D),
 PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE REQUIRED
 MINIMUM FIVE (5) FEET WIDE LANDSCAPED STRIP ON THE EAST
 SIDE OF THE PROPOSED ???PRIVATE PROPERTY WITH ACCESS
 EASEMENT??? EXIT ALLEY/DRIVE ACCESS AREA. [SATISFIED]
 54. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A SIDEWALK
 ALONG THE NORTHSIDE OF THE ALLEY, IF ANY PEDESTRIAN
 ACCESS OR ACTIVITIES ARE EXPECTED ALONG THE ALLEY.
 OTHERWISE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A FENCE/WALL
 ALONG THE NORTHSIDE OF THE ALLEY. [SATISFIED]
 55. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A SIDEWALK
 ALONG THE EASTSIDE OF THE PROPOSED EXIT
 ALLEY/DRIVE/PRIVATE PROPERTY WITH ACCESS EASEMENT AREA
 FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK ON 24TH STREET TO THE PROPOSED
 PARKING GARAGE ENTRY/EXIT OPENING AND A CROSSWALK AT
 THE PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE ENTRY/EXIT OPENING.
 [WITHDRAWN]
 56. PLEASE EXPLORE RELOCATING THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS
 SURROUNDING THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ??? COURTYARD AREA
 TO FRONT ALONG 24TH STREET AND RECONFIGURING THE
 PARKING GARAGE AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ??? COURTYARD
 AREA. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
 57. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE NUMBER OF AFFORDABLE
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN THE ???UNIT MIX??? TABLE ON SHEET
 A0.1. [SATISFIED]
 58. THE PROPOSED LOADING SPACE WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG 25TH STREET IS NOT PERMITTED,
 THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 59. THE PROPOSAL IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ZLDR
 SUBSECTION 94-209(2)(J)(1)(A) REGARDING THE REQUIRED
 PLANAR BREAKS ALONG THE NORTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS OF
 THE PROPOSED BUILDING. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE
 PLANS/ELEVATIONS/DIAGRAMS/RENDERINGS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]
 60. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL EXCEEDS
 THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED WITHIN THE NORTHWOOD
 MIXED-USE DISTRICT (NMUD) TRANSITION SUB-DISTRICT
 ACCORDING TO ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-210(H)(1). HOWEVER, THE
 APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 306-22 WILL RENDER THIS
 REVIEW COMMENT WITHDRAWN. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
 61. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL EXCEEDS
 THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS ALLOWED (WHICH
 INCLUDES THE EXISTING AND APPROVED) WITHIN THE NMUD
 ACCORDING TO POLICY 1.7.2.2 OF THE FUTURE LAND USE
 ELEMENT OF THE CITY???S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. [RESPONSE
 PROVIDED]
  
  
 KEVIE DEFRANC
 SENIOR PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
 [email protected]
 561-822-1449
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved