| Date |
Text |
| 2023-01-18 16:01:08 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE |
| | 12/21/22 PPRC SUBMITTAL. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED COMMENTS |
| | ARE NOT INCLUDED. |
| | |
| | 1. [SATISFIED] CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 NOT |
| | LISTED. 12/8/22 UPDATED COMMENT - THE SURVEY LISTS THE |
| | CONVERSION FACTOR AS 1.50 FT. THE CIVIL PLANS LIST THE |
| | CONVERSION FACTOR AS 1.522 FEET. THE CONVERSION |
| | EQUATION SHOULD MATCH ON THESE DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | 6. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM FACE OF |
| | BUILDING TO CENTERLINE OF RIGHTS OF WAY FOR 24TH |
| | STREET, 25TH STREET AND SPRUCE AVE. SHOW RIGHT OF WAY, |
| | OFFSET DISTANCES, SURFACE FEATURES, GENERAL SURFACE |
| | SLOPES WITH MAX. ALLOWED PERCENTAGES, BREAK POINTS, |
| | ETC. |
| | |
| | 10. [NOT SATISFIED ??? EOR TO RESOLVE PRIOR TO |
| | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.] CHECK THE PROPOSED |
| | ELEVATIONS AT THE BASE OF THE STEPS FOR THE UNITS ALONG |
| | 25TH STREET VS. THE EXISTING BACK OF SIDEWALK |
| | ELEVATION. SOME PROPOSED ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO BE BELOW |
| | THE BOW OR MORE THAN 1 INCH ABOVE THE BOW. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS (8/4/2022 SUBMITTAL): |
| | |
| | 13. [NOT SATISFIED] JUSTIFY ALL OUTFALL PIPE DIAMETERS |
| | LARGER THAN 15 INCH. THIS INFORMATION CAN BE PROVIDED |
| | WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | |
| | 16. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION FOR THE ALLEY |
| | ENTRANCE FROM THE CENTERLINE OF 24TH STREET TO 5 FEET |
| | NORTH OF THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY OF 24TH ST. SHOW GRADE |
| | BREAKS, SURFACE MATERIALS, RIGHT OF WAY LINE, RIGHT OF |
| | WAY NAME, DIMENSIONS FROM RIGHT OF WAY TO GRADE BREAKS. |
| | |
| | 17. [SATISFIED] SHOW AND CALLOUT NEW CURBING ON 24TH |
| | STREET AND THE REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING CURBING FOR THE |
| | PROPOSED ALLEY DRIVEWAY AND LANDSCAPE ISLANDS. |
| | |
| | 19. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE GRADES AROUND THE NEW ALLEY |
| | ENTRANCE ON 24TH ST. |
| | |
| | 20. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - LABEL ALL EXISTING UTILITIES |
| | ON THE PAVING AND GRADING, THE DRAINAGE AND THE WATER |
| | AND WASTEWATER PLAN SHEETS.] LABEL (SIZE AND MATERIAL) |
| | EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. |
| | |
| | 21. [NOT SATISFIED - ONLY STRUCTURES ARE SHOWN, NO |
| | PIPING.] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND |
| | COORDINATE THE LANDSCAPING AND UTILITY PLANS. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS (12/21/22 SUBMITTAL): |
| | 22. REVIEW SPOT GRADE OF 16.40 FT NAVD AT NORTHEAST |
| | CORNER OF THE DEVELOPMENT. THIS GRADE IS ONE FOOT |
| | HIGHER THAN THE FFE. COMMENT CAN BE ADDRESSED AT |
| | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 23. REVIEW EXISTING SPOT GRADES ALONG THE NORTH CURB |
| | LINE OF 24TH ST, WEST OF THE ALLEY DRIVEWAY. THERE IS A |
| | 2.5+ FEET DROP ACROSS THE PARKING SPACE (15.71 TO 13.08 |
| | FT NAVD). |
| | |
| | 24. PROPOSED ALLEY DRIVEWAY BULBOUT WILL |
| | INTERRUPT/BLOCK THE DRAINAGE FLOW WEST OF THE DRIVEWAY. |
| | |
| | 25. SECTION A FOR THE ALLEY R/W (SHED SECTION) DOES NOT |
| | MATCH THE GRADING PLAN FOR THE ALLEY (INVERTED CROWN) |
| | OR MATCH THE PROPOSED SPOT GRADES. |
| | |
| | 26. SECTION C SHOWS THE ALLEY PAVEMENT SLOPING TO THE |
| | RIGHT (OR NORTH). THE GRADING PLAN INDICATES THE ALLEY |
| | WILL SLOPE TO THE SOUTH. |
| | |
| | 27. SECTION E ??? PROVIDE STEEPER CROSS SLOPE (0.5% |
| | MIN. ) FOR 10 FT WIDE SIDEWALK TO PROMOTE DRAINAGE. THE |
| | SPOT GRADES WILL CREATE A 0.1% CROSS SLOPE. INDICATE |
| | WHAT THE 15.62 SPOT GRADE IS FOR. THESE COMMENTS CAN BE |
| | ADDRESSED DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 28. SECTION F ??? |
| | A. LABEL THE R/W LINE AND THE DISTANCE FROM THE BACK OF |
| | CURB. |
| | B. SECTION ARROWS FACING THE WRONG DIRECTION. |
| | C. IS THE BREM NECESSARY ALONG THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 29. ADD THE FOLLOWING LINE TYPES TO THE SHEET LEGEND: |
| | H2O, ELEC, FO, SAN AND ANY OTHER LINETYPES THAT APPEAR |
| | ON THE PLANS. THIS CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING ENGINEERING |
| | PERMIT SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | CONDITIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL: |
| | 1. DEVELOPER TO BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE DRAINAGE |
| | SYSTEM IN THE ALLEY EASEMENT. |
| | |
| | 2. GRADING OF PUBLIC ALLEY IS TO BLEND IN WITH THE |
| | ADJOINING PROPERTIES WITHOUT ADDING ADDITIONAL RUNOFF |
| | TO THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES. |
| | |
| | 3. CURB RAMPS TO MEET CURRENT ADA STANDARDS IF THE |
| | ASPHALT ADJACENT TO THE RAMP IS MODIFIED IN ANY WAY. |
| | |
| | 4. ALLEY EASEMENT LINES TO BE SHOWN ON ALL OF THE |
| | ENGINEERING PLAN SHEETS. |
| | |
| | 5. 24TH STREET DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO BE |
| | APPROVED BY FDOT. |
| | |
| | TRACY WARD, PE |
| | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | 561-494-1120 (O) |
| | 561-351-0510 (M) |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
