| Date |
Text |
| 2022-12-06 13:17:39 | TRAFFIC ANALYSIS COMMENTS |
| | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE AVAILABLE |
| | 2) SATISFIED. SETUP A METHODOLOGY MEETING WITH THE |
| | CITY???S TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING GROUP |
| | 3) SATISFIED. AT THE MINIMUM, THE ANALYSIS MUST BE |
| | REVISED TO INCLUDE TRIPS GENERATED BY THE RESIDENTIAL |
| | PORTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | 4) SATISFIED. DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE ANALYSIS, |
| | TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES SHALL |
| | BE PROPOSED, DISCUSSED AND IMPLEMENTED ACCORDINGLY |
| | 5) SATISFIED. THE ALLEY IS TOO NARROW TO ACCOMMODATE |
| | THE INCREASE IN VEHICULAR TRIPS |
| | 6) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ALLEYWAY WILL BE DESIGNATED |
| | ONE-WAY EASTBOUND. ANALYSIS SHALL BE REVISED |
| | ACCORDINGLY. FIGURE 4 SHOWS VEHICLES EXITING THE ALLEY |
| | IN THE WESTBOUND DIRECTION. SHOWCASED SITE PLAN A1 DOES |
| | NOT MATCH LATEST RESUBMISSION, PLEASE REPLACE IT WITH |
| | T1.0 |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS |
| | 7) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN |
| | SHOWCASING ALL TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY, |
| | DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, |
| | DRIVEWAY, GATES, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, ETC.) |
| | PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. SHEET A1.0 IS A GOOD |
| | STARTING POINT. PLEASE INCLUDE AND MERGE ALL THE |
| | TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION FROM BOTH CIVIL AND |
| | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS INTO A SINGLE SHEET. EITHER CALL |
| | THE SHEET T1.0 OR TITLE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN. |
| | PLEASE REMOVE AUTOTURN FROM THE TRANSPORTATION SITE |
| | PLAN |
| | 8) SATISFIED. IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, PLEASE |
| | SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, |
| | AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS |
| | SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | 9) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR |
| | GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND |
| | OUT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC |
| | ENVELOPES CLEARLY DEFINED. CURRENT ANALYSIS IS NOT |
| | PROPER FROM A GRAPHICAL POINT OF VIEW; MOREOVER, THERE |
| | IS ENCROACHMENT BETWEEN TRUCK PATH AND PARKING STALLS |
| | ON 24TH ST. PLEASE USE COLORS FOR EACH OF THE PATHS. |
| | ANALYSIS NEEDS TO BE RE-RERUN ACCORDING TO SITE PLAN |
| | REVISION(S) THAT MAY IMPACT THE ROUTE, SPECIFICALLY: |
| | THE SIDEWALK ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE ALLEYWAY. |
| | MOREOVER, PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR A DELIVERY |
| | TRUCK MANEUVERING IN AND OUT OF THE LOADING ZONE. |
| | PLEASE USE DIFFERENT COLORS FOR VEHICLE WHEEL-PATH AND |
| | ITS DYNAMIC ENVELOPE, SANITATION TRUCK SHOWS SEVERAL |
| | ENCROACHMENTS |
| | 10) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY |
| | ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 |
| | FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. MORE |
| | SPECIFICS ON THE ELECTRIFICATION: A CONDUIT (2-INCH |
| | SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL |
| | PULL BOX (240V ??? 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE. |
| | SHEET A1.0 DOES NOT SEEM TO SHOW THE AREA, PLEASE |
| | SPECIFY ITS LOCATION IN YOUR COMMENT RESPONSE |
| | 11) SATISFIED. DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN |
| | VEHICULAR TRAFFIC, UNLESS WIDENED TO A MINIMUM OF 20 |
| | FEET, THE ALLEY MUST BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY BETWEEN |
| | BROADWAY AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. DIRECTIONALITY |
| | SHALL BE DECIDED IN COORDINATION WITH SANITATION/PUBLIC |
| | WORKS. EASTBOUND DIRECTIONALITY HAS BEEN CHOSEN. |
| | SHOWCASE THE 15 FEET WIDTH ON THE TRANSPORTATION SITE |
| | PLAN, BASED ON THE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS IT DOES NOT SEEM |
| | TO BE AS WIDE |
| | 12) SATISFIED. IF ANY PEDESTRIAN ACCESS OR ACTIVITIES |
| | ARE EXPECTED ALONG THE ALLEY, A SIDEWALK MUST BE |
| | INSTALLED. OTHERWISE INSTALL A WALL/FENCE OR BOLLARDS |
| | ALONG THE YARD AREA FOR SAFETY PURPOSES. |
| | 13) SATISFIED. WIDTH OF THE DRIVEWAY ON 24TH ST CANNOT |
| | EXCEED 25 FEET. SHEET A2.0 CURRENTLY SHOWS 32 FEET |
| | 14) SATISFIED. MAXIMUM SLOPE ON PARKING RAMPS CANNOT |
| | EXCEED 6%. SHEET A2.0 CURRENTLY SHOWS VALUES BETWEEN |
| | 6.1 TO 6.3 % |
| | 15) SATISFIED. PROVIDE MORE DETAILS OF THE PARKING DECK |
| | IN SHEET A4.0 AND A5.0. A TURNAROUND SPACE MUST BE |
| | PROVIDED AT THE DEAD-END OF THE GARAGE. PROVIDE |
| | DIMENSIONS FOR THE PARKING STALLS ADJACENT TO A WALL OR |
| | OBSTRUCTIONS. PER CITY CODE SEC94-111(C)(1): ???IN |
| | THOSE CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO |
| | A WALL, FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION, |
| | THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE |
| | FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF |
| | THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A |
| | MINIMUM OF TWO FEET.??? |
| | 16) SATISFIED. PER THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN, SPRUCE |
| | AVE IS DESIGNATED AS A BICYCLE BOULEVARD. INSTALL |
| | SHARROW MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE ACCORDINGLY ALONG THE |
| | SECTION FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | 17) SATISFIED. IN THE PARKING TABLE INCLUDE THE NUMBER |
| | OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BICYCLE STALLS |
| | 18) SATISFIED. CLEARLY INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE |
| | BIKE RACKS IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN |
| | 19) SATISFIED. BASED ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE |
| | COMMERCIAL RETAIL PORTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, |
| | A 10 X 25 FEET LOADING ZONE MUST BE PROVIDED. CLEARLY |
| | MARK AND DIMENSION THE LOCATION OF SUCH ZONE IN THE |
| | TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN |
| | 20) SATISFIED. THE WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK ON THE WEST |
| | SIDE ALONG 25TH ST IS NARROWED BY A LANDSCAPE ISLAND, |
| | PLEASE MODIFY IT FOR SAKE OF SIDEWALK WIDTH CONTINUITY |
| | 21) SATISFIED. INSTALL STOP SIGN AND STOP BAR AT THE |
| | ALLEY EXIT ON 24TH ST |
| | 22) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOWCASE ALL REQUIRED |
| | AND PROPOSED PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNS IN THE |
| | TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN. REFER TO OTHER COMMENTS |
| | PERTAINING MISSING OR REQUESTED DIMENSIONS, MARKINGS |
| | AND SIGNAGE |
| | 23) THE EAST END OF THE ALLEY FACING THE GARAGE |
| | ENTRANCE IS APPROXIMATELY 28-FEET WIDE, PLEASE INSTALL |
| | PAVEMENT MARKINGS SO TO PROVIDE TWO TRAVEL LANES, ONE |
| | STRAIGHT- ONLY ALIGNED WITH GARAGE ENTRANCE, THE OTHER |
| | RIGHT-TURN-ONLY FOR TURNING VEHICLES. INSTALL STOP BARS |
| | AND SIGNAGE ACCORDINGLY. SEPARATE THE TWO TRAVEL LANES |
| | WITH A CHEVRON-STYLED PAVEMENT MARKED DIVIDING ISLAND |
| | 24) INSTALL DO-NOT-ENTER SIGNS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE |
| | EAST END OF THE ALLEY FACING THE GARAGE ENTRANCE |
| | 25) INSTALL AND SHOW IN THE T1.0 ONE-WAY SIGNAGE AT THE |
| | WEST END OF THE ALLEY (BOTH SIDES) AND AT EACH LOCATION |
| | WHERE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES DRIVEWAYS ACCESS THE ALLEY |
| | 26) PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE |
| | REFER TO CITY CODE 86-246 FOR DETAILS |
| | 27) EXISTING SIDEWALK WALKABLE AREA ALONG SPRUCE AVE IS |
| | BETWEEN 7 AND 13-FEET. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS REDUCING |
| | IT TO 6-FEET. PLEASE REVISE, CLEARLY DIMENSION, AND |
| | PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 7-FEET WALKABLE AREA ACCORDINGLY |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
