| Date |
Text |
| 2022-08-29 12:00:44 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS |
| | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE AVAILABLE |
| | 2) NOT SATISFIED. SETUP A METHODOLOGY MEETING WITH THE |
| | CITY?S TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING GROUP |
| | 3) SATISFIED. AT THE MINIMUM, THE ANALYSIS MUST BE |
| | REVISED TO INCLUDE TRIPS GENERATED BY THE RESIDENTIAL |
| | PORTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | 4) NOT SATISFIED. DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE |
| | ANALYSIS, TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) |
| | MEASURES SHALL BE PROPOSED, DISCUSSED AND IMPLEMENTED |
| | ACCORDINGLY |
| | 5) SATISFIED. THE ALLEY IS TOO NARROW TO ACCOMMODATE |
| | THE INCREASE IN VEHICULAR TRIPS |
| | 6) ALLEYWAY WILL BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY EASTBOUND. |
| | ANALYSIS SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY |
| | |
| | SITE COMMENTS |
| | 7) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN SHOWCASING |
| | ALL TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY, DRIVING |
| | AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, DRIVEWAY, |
| | GATES, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, ETC.) PROPERLY |
| | LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. SHEET A1.0 IS A GOOD STARTING |
| | POINT. PLEASE INCLUDE AND MERGE ALL THE TRANSPORTATION |
| | INFORMATION FROM BOTH CIVIL AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS |
| | INTO A SINGLE SHEET. EITHER CALL THE SHEET T1.0 OR |
| | TITLE IT TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN. |
| | 8) NOT SATISFIED. IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, |
| | PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY, CURB |
| | CUTS, AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE |
| | ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | 9) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR |
| | GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND |
| | OUT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC |
| | ENVELOPES CLEARLY DEFINED. CURRENT ANALYSIS IS NOT |
| | PROPER FROM A GRAPHICAL POINT OF VIEW; MOREOVER, THERE |
| | IS ENCROACHMENT BETWEEN TRUCK PATH AND PARKING STALLS |
| | ON 24TH ST. PLEASE USE COLORS FOR EACH OF THE PATHS. |
| | ANALYSIS NEEDS TO BE RE-RERUN ACCORDING TO SITE PLAN |
| | REVISION(S) THAT MAY IMPACT THE ROUTE, SPECIFICALLY: |
| | THE SIDEWALK ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE ALLEYWAY. |
| | MOREOVER, PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR A DELIVERY |
| | TRUCK MANEUVERING IN AND OUT OF THE LOADING ZONE |
| | 10) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN |
| | EASILY ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM |
| | 8 X 20 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION |
| | READINESS. MORE SPECIFICS ON THE ELECTRIFICATION: A |
| | CONDUIT (2? SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH |
| | AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V ? 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH |
| | FEATURE. SHEET A1.0 DOES NOT SEEM TO SHOW THE AREA, |
| | PLEASE SPECIFY ITS LOCATION IN YOUR COMMENT RESPONSE |
| | 11) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANT |
| | INCREASE IN VEHICULAR TRAFFIC, UNLESS WIDENED TO A |
| | MINIMUM OF 20 FEET, THE ALLEY MUST BE DESIGNATED |
| | ONE-WAY BETWEEN BROADWAY AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. |
| | DIRECTIONALITY SHALL BE DECIDED IN COORDINATION WITH |
| | SANITATION/PUBLIC WORKS. EASTBOUND DIRECTIONALITY HAS |
| | BEEN CHOSEN. SHOWCASE THE 15 FEET WIDTH ON THE |
| | TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, BASED ON THE AUTOTURN |
| | ANALYSIS IT DOES NOT SEEM TO BE AS WIDE. |
| | 12) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IF ANY PEDESTRIAN ACCESS OR |
| | ACTIVITIES ARE EXPECTED ALONG THE ALLEY, A SIDEWALK |
| | MUST BE INSTALLED. OTHERWISE INSTALL A WALL/FENCE OR |
| | BOLLARDS ALONG THE YARD AREA FOR SAFETY PURPOSES. |
| | 13) SATISFIED. WIDTH OF THE DRIVEWAY ON 24TH ST CANNOT |
| | EXCEED 25 FEET. SHEET A2.0 CURRENTLY SHOWS 32 FEET |
| | 14) SATISFIED. MAXIMUM SLOPE ON PARKING RAMPS CANNOT |
| | EXCEED 6%. SHEET A2.0 CURRENTLY SHOWS VALUES BETWEEN |
| | 6.1 TO 6.3 % |
| | 15) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE MORE DETAILS OF THE |
| | PARKING DECK IN SHEET A4.0 AND A5.0. A TURNAROUND SPACE |
| | MUST BE PROVIDED AT THE DEAD-END OF THE GARAGE. PROVIDE |
| | DIMENSIONS FOR THE PARKING STALLS ADJACENT TO A WALL OR |
| | OBSTRUCTIONS. PER CITY CODE SEC94-111(C)(1): ?IN THOSE |
| | CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO A |
| | WALL, FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION, |
| | THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE |
| | FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF |
| | THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A |
| | MINIMUM OF TWO FEET.? |
| | 16) SATISFIED. PER THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN, SPRUCE |
| | AVE IS DESIGNATED AS A BICYCLE BOULEVARD. INSTALL |
| | SHARROW MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE ACCORDINGLY ALONG THE |
| | SECTION FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | 17) SATISFIED. IN THE PARKING TABLE INCLUDE THE NUMBER |
| | OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BICYCLE STALLS |
| | 18) SATISFIED. CLEARLY INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE |
| | BIKE RACKS IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN |
| | 19) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. BASED ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF |
| | THE COMMERCIAL RETAIL PORTION OF THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT, A 10 X 25 FEET LOADING ZONE MUST BE |
| | PROVIDED. CLEARLY MARK AND DIMENSION THE LOCATION OF |
| | SUCH ZONE IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN |
| | 20) SATISFIED. THE WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK ON THE WEST |
| | SIDE ALONG 25TH ST IS NARROWED BY A LANDSCAPE ISLAND, |
| | PLEASE MODIFY IT FOR SAKE OF SIDEWALK WIDTH CONTINUITY |
| | 21) INSTALL STOP SIGN AND STOP BAR AT THE ALLEY EXIT ON |
| | 24TH ST |
| | 22) PLEASE SHOWCASE ALL REQUIRED AND PROPOSED PAVEMENT |
| | MARKINGS AND SIGNS IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
