| Date |
Text |
| 2022-07-08 13:34:17 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS |
| | 1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER |
| | 2) SETUP A METHODOLOGY MEETING WITH THE CITY'S |
| | TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING GROUP |
| | 3) AT THE MINIMUM, THE ANALYSIS MUST BE REVISED TO |
| | INCLUDE TRIPS GENERATED BY THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF |
| | THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | 4) DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE ANALYSIS, |
| | TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES SHALL |
| | BE PROPOSED, DISCUSSED AND IMPLEMENTED ACCORDINGLY |
| | 5) THE ALLEY IS TOO NARROW TO ACCOMMODATE THE INCREASE |
| | IN VEHICULAR TRIPS |
| | |
| | SITE COMMENTS |
| | 6) PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN SHOWCASING ALL |
| | TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY, DRIVING AISLES, |
| | PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, DRIVEWAY, GATES, |
| | SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED AND |
| | DIMENSIONED. SHEET A1.0 IS A GOOD STARTING POINT. |
| | 7) IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE |
| | BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, AND |
| | PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS |
| | SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | 8) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR |
| | SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY |
| | DEFINED. CURRENT ANALYSIS IS NOT PROPER FROM A |
| | GRAPHICAL POINT OF VIEW; MOREOVER, THERE IS |
| | ENCROACHMENT BETWEEN TRUCK PATH AND PARKING STALLS ON |
| | 24TH ST |
| | 9) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE |
| | MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND |
| | PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. MORE SPECIFICS |
| | ON THE ELECTRIFICATION: A CONDUIT (2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC) |
| | TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V |
| | 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND |
| | SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE. |
| | 10) DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN VEHICULAR |
| | TRAFFIC, UNLESS WIDENED TO A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET, THE |
| | ALLEY MUST BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY BETWEEN BROADWAY AND |
| | THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. DIRECTIONALITY SHALL BE |
| | DECIDED IN COORDINATION WITH SANITATION/PUBLIC WORKS |
| | 11) IF ANY PEDESTRIAN ACCESS OR ACTIVITIES ARE EXPECTED |
| | ALONG THE ALLEY, A SIDEWALK MUST BE INSTALLED OR |
| | 12) WIDTH OF THE DRIVEWAY ON 24TH ST CANNOT EXCEED 25 |
| | FEET. SHEET A2.0 CURRENTLY SHOWS 32 FEET |
| | 13) MAXIMUM SLOPE ON PARKING RAMPS CANNOT EXCEED 6%. |
| | SHEET A2.0 CURRENTLY SHOWS VALUES BETWEEN 6.1 TO 6.3 % |
| | 14) PROVIDE MORE DETAILS OF THE PARKING DECK IN SHEET |
| | A4.0 AND A5.0. A TURNAROUND SPACE MUST BE PROVIDED AT |
| | THE DEAD-END OF THE GARAGE |
| | 15) PER THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN, SPRUCE AVE IS |
| | DESIGNATED AS A BICYCLE BOULEVARD. INSTALL SHARROW |
| | MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE ACCORDINGLY ALONG THE SECTION |
| | FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | 16) IN THE PARKING TABLE INCLUDE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED |
| | AND PROVIDED BICYCLE STALLS |
| | 17) CLEARLY INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE BIKE RACKS IN |
| | THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN |
| | 18) BASED ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE COMMERCIAL |
| | RETAIL PORTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, A 10 X 25 |
| | FEET LOADING ZONE MUST BE PROVIDED. CLEARLY MARK THE |
| | LOCATION OF SUCH ZONE IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN |
| | 19) THE WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK ON THE WEST SIDE ALONG |
| | 25TH ST IS NARROWED BY A LANDSCAPE ISLAND, PLEASE |
| | MODIFY IT FOR SAKE OF SIDEWALK WIDTH CONTINUITY |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
