| Date |
Text |
| 2022-08-01 13:59:04 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 08.01.2022 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z22060006 |
| | CASE NO.: PB 791LL |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. THE SITE DATA TABLE INDICATES THAT FIVE (5) BIKE |
| | RACKS ARE BEING PROPOSED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE |
| | BUILDING; PLEASE IDENTIFY THEIR LOCATION AND ENSURE |
| | THAT PROPER CLEARANCE IS PROVIDED (AS SHOWN IN THE |
| | DETAIL) TO AVOID BLOCKING OF THE SIDEWALK, ETC. |
| | |
| | 2. THE WAIVER TABLE SHOULD BE REVISED TO INDICATE: |
| | 2.1. REQUIRED |
| | 2.2. ORIGINALLY PROVIDED |
| | 2.3. APPROVED WAIVER |
| | 2.4. CURRENT PROPOSAL |
| | |
| | 3. WHY IS LOT 4N NOT SHOWING ANY PARKING REQUIRED IN |
| | THE ?REQUIRED (NON-SHARED) PARKING? TABLE? |
| | |
| | 4. REVISED TPS LETTER SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 5. REVISED SCAD APPROVAL REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 6. WHY ARE THERE TWO (2) SITE PLANS LABELED SP1? ONE IS |
| | PREPARED BY SCHMIDT NICHOLS, THE OTHER IS PREPARED BY |
| | MSA. |
| | |
| | 7. FLOOR PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL LEVELS TO |
| | CONFIRM UNIT COUNTS, NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES, ETC. |
| | |
| | 8. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE SYNTHETIC TURF IS BEING |
| | CONSIDERED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION |
| | 94-451 OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | 9. MULTIPLE PORTIONS OF THE BUILDING ARE EXTENDING INTO |
| | THE 20 FOOT CANAL BUFFER REQUIRED BY THE DECLARATION OF |
| | COVENANTS. PER RESOLUTION NO. 16-21, ?ANY AND ALL |
| | MODIFICATIONS TO THE CENTREPARK DECLARATION OF |
| | COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS (ORB 5430 | PG |
| | 1548) SHALL BE COMPLETED AND RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC |
| | RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY? PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF |
| | A BUILDING PERMIT. PLEASE PROVIDE A STATUS ON SUCH |
| | REVISIONS. |
| | |
| | 10. THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE PROVIDED IS INCORRECT IN |
| | THE SITE DATA TABLE?IT APPEARS NOT TO HAVE BEEN |
| | UPDATED. |
| | |
| | 11. THE MONUMENT SIGN CANNOT EXCEED 4 FEET IN HEIGHT |
| | BUT SHALL OTHERWISE MEET THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE XIII |
| | OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | 12. IT APPEARS THAT A NUMBER OF NOTES THAT WERE ON THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED SITE PLAN RELATING TO IRRIGATION, |
| | PLUMBING FIXTURES, ETC. HAS BEEN REMOVED; PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY WHY. |
| | |
| | 13. THE PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED SP-3 NEEDS TO BE REVISED. |
| | |
| | 14. IS ALL OF THE INFORMATION ON THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED SP-2 NOW LOCATED ON SP-1? |
| | |
| | 15. A LABEL FOR THE ?5? LANDSCAPE BUFFER? IS POINTING |
| | TO A STAIRWELL IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE GARAGE. |
| | |
| | 16. ADA STRIPING IS BEING SHOWN IN THE LOADING DOCK, |
| | GARAGE ENTRY, AND TWO (2) PARKING SPACES NORTH OF THE |
| | VAN-ACCESSIBLE PARKING. |
| | |
| | 17. THE BUILDING OUTLINE DOES NOT MATCH THAT SHOWN ON |
| | THE FLOOR PLAN, SPECIFICALLY THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF |
| | THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 18. IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON LOT 2 NORTH (LANDSCAPING, |
| | PARKING MODIFICATIONS, ETC.) ? PLEASE PROVIDE AN |
| | APPROVAL BY THE PROPERTY OWNER? THE LANDSCAPING SHOWN |
| | ON THIS PARCEL SHOULD NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD THE |
| | REQUIRED LANDSCAPING OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. |
| | |
| | 19. THE COLOR ELEVATIONS PROVIDED DO NOT MATCH THE |
| | PROPOSED BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 20. THERE APPEAR TO BE NUMEROUS ENCROACHMENTS INTO THE |
| | SOUTH (CORNER SIDE) SETBACK. STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS, |
| | BALCONIES, ETC. ARE ALLOWED TO ENCROACH INTO THE |
| | SETBACK, BUT NOT BY MORE THAN THREE (3) FEET. PLEASE |
| | DIMENSION ALL ENCROACHMENTS AND ENSURE THEY DO NOT |
| | EXCEED THREE (3) FEET. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | TTY: 800.955.8771 |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| |
Print |
