| Date |
Text |
| 2022-07-15 16:54:19 | PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | -PRIOR REVIEW COMMENT FOR THE PROJECT: THE FORCE MAIN |
| | EASEMENT IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLAN SHEETS. PLEASE SHOW |
| | AND LABEL. MAR2022 RESPONSE: IT HAS BEEN REQUESTED FOR |
| | THE SURVEYOR TO PICK UP THE EXISTING FORCE MAIN |
| | EASEMENT. WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED UPDATED SURVEY BACK YET |
| | AND WILL UPDATE OUR PLANS ONCE AVAILABLE. |
| | PLEASE UPDATE CIVIL PLANS TO SHOW FORCE MAIN EASEMENT. |
| | |
| | -PAGE 4 OF MINOR AMENDMENT JUSTIFICATION LETTER |
| | MENTIONED PARKING EASEMENTS EXHIBT A PGS 10-12. COULD |
| | NOT LOCATE IT IN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. PLEASE ADD WITH |
| | RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | -PG 6 OF MINOR AMENDMENT JUSTIFICATION LETTER SHOWS |
| | PROPOSED GARAGE ENTRANCE FURTHER NORTH, BUT I COULD NOT |
| | LOCATE PLANS THAT LOOKED SIMILAR. PLEASE INDICATE IF |
| | GARAGE ENTRANCE LOCATION IS CHANGING AND UPDATE EITHER |
| | JUSTIFICATION LETTER PICTURE OR PLANS. |
| | |
| | -WOULD NEED TO UPDATE THE OPEN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT |
| | PROJECT WITH ANY CHANGES THAT ARE APPROVED. |
| | |
| | -PRIOR REVIEW COMMENT FOR THE PROJECT: PLAN SAYS THERE |
| | IS A CAFE, BUT CANNOT FIND GREASE TRAP. WHERE IS IT |
| | INSTALLED AT? MEP. FEB2022 RESPONSE: GREASE TRAP DESIGN |
| | IS BEING HANDLED BY THE GREASE TRAP TO BE LOCATED ON |
| | SOUTH SIDE OF BUILDING AND LINE IS TO ROUTE BACK |
| | THROUGH THE BUILDING TO THE TIE-IN POINT FOR THE |
| | SANITARY SERVICE LOCATED AT THE NORTH SIDE OF THE |
| | BUILDING NEAR GARAGE. |
| | PLEASE VERIFY GREASE TRAP IS STILL GOING TO BE |
| | INSTALLED AND INDICATE IF IT WILL BE INSIDE BUILDING OR |
| | ON THE OUTSIDE. IF OUTSIDE, PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL ON |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | -LP.3 DOES NOT ACCURATELY SHOW UTILITIES. PLEASE UPDATE |
| | LP.3 AND VERIFY NO CONFLICTS BETWEEN TREES AND |
| | UTILITIES. |
| | |
| | -THERE WERE TWO PRIOR ACTION ITEMS FOR THE PROJECT AS |
| | DESCRIBED IN BELOW COMMENTS AND RESPONSES. HAVE THEY |
| | BEEN COMPLETED? ALSO INDICATE IF ANY OF THE PROPOSED |
| | BUILDING CHANGES WOUDL CAUSE NEW ENCROACHMENTS. |
| | |
| | 3. IS IT ALRIGHT FOR RETAINING WALL, SOUTHWEST CORNERS |
| | OF BUILDING, AND SIDEWALK TO |
| | BE IN 20 FOOT CANAL BUFFER AS SHOWN ON SHEET 4 AND |
| | SHEET 5? |
| | ATTACHED IS THE CANAL BUFFER SURVEY SHOWING THE |
| | ENCROACHMENTS AND THE LETTER |
| | SIGNED BY THE DECLARANT ACCEPTING THESE ENCROACHMENTS. |
| | DOCUMENTS ARE IN THE |
| | PROCESS OF BEING RECORDED. |
| | 4. CIVIL PLANS DO NOT SHOW 20 FOOT LAKE EASEMENT THAT |
| | IS SHOWN ON SURVEY. PLEASE |
| | SHOW AND LABEL IT ON CIVIL PLANS IF STILL THERE. IS IT |
| | ALRIGHT FOR RETAINING WALL |
| | AND NORTH CORNER OF BUILDING TO BE IN THAT EASEMENT? |
| | THE LAKE EASEMENT AND WATER MANAGEMENT TRACT WILL BE |
| | REPLATTED TO SO THAT THE WALL |
| | AND BUILDING DO NOT ENCROACH INTO THEM. |
| |
Print |
