| Date |
Text |
| 2022-10-25 22:18:06 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS |
| | 1) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE |
| | RECEIVED |
| | 2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ADDRESS THE FDOT |
| | REQUIREMENTS/CONDITIONS IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY. PROVIDE A |
| | SPECIFIC PARAGRAPH AND/OR FURTHER NARRATIVE ADDRESSING |
| | FDOT COMMENT PERTAINING THE EVALUATION OF A NORTHBOUND |
| | RIGHT TURN LANE AT THE QUADRILLE & FERN INTERSECTION |
| | 3) FERN/QUADRILLE, FERN/DIXIE, LAKEVIEW/QUADRILLE |
| | VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEETS IN THE APPENDIX. PLEASE |
| | EXPLAIN THE NEGATIVE NUMBERS FOR THE RT PROJECT TRAFFIC |
| | 4) PLEASE PROVIDE REASONING PERTAINING THE RTOR |
| | REDUCTION PARAMETER AND ITS VALUE. PLEASE REMOVE IT |
| | WHEN IT DOES NOT APPLY (E.G. WESTBOUND RT AT FERN AND |
| | DIXIE) |
| | 5) UNLESS THE SAME VOLUMES ARE PRODUCED, PLEASE USE THE |
| | LATEST COUNTY INTERNAL CAPTURE SPREADSHEET, AND PROVIDE |
| | IT AS PART OF THE TRAFFIC REVIEW SUBMISSION MATERIAL |
| | 6) PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY RT VOLUMES ARE OMITTED IN SYNCHRO |
| | TIMINGS ANALYSIS OUTPUT |
| | 7) FERN/QUADRILLE SYNCHRO TIMINGS AND HCM, PLEASE |
| | EXPLAIN HOW FOR CERTAIN MOVEMENTS THE DELAY DECREASES |
| | WHEN COMPARING EXISTING VS FUTURE SCENARIOS, GIVEN THE |
| | SAME SIGNAL TIMING PLAN, BUT HIGHER VOLUMES IN THE |
| | LATTER |
| | 8) WAS SYNCHRO TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION FEATURE |
| | UTILIZED IN THE ANALYSIS? IF YES, PLEASE SPECIFY AND |
| | ELABORATE IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY |
| | 9) PLEASE PROVIDE SYNCHRO NETWORK FILES AS PART OF THE |
| | TRAFFIC REVIEW SUBMISSION MATERIAL |
| | 10 PLEASE INSERT PAGE NUMBERS FOR EACH PAGE OF THE |
| | TRAFFIC STUDY, INCLUDING APPENDIX ONES FOR EASE OF |
| | REFERENCE |
| | SITE COMMENTS |
| | 11) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT |
| | MARKING PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE |
| | SITE. C-101 IS MISSING SEVERAL STOP BARS AND |
| | CORRESPONDING SIGNS, ON-STREET PARKING STALLS ARE NOT |
| | MARKED, |
| | 12) NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS IN |
| | A SEPARATE FILE THAN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN. |
| | PLEASE SHOWCASE BOTH DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND WHEEL PATHS |
| | IN DIFFERENT COLORS. C-102 AND C-103 DRAWINGS ARE NOT |
| | PROPER |
| | 13) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN |
| | EASILY ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM |
| | 8 X 20 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION |
| | READINESS WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH |
| | SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL |
| | PULL BOX (240V / 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE INSERT THIS |
| | FEATURE IN THE T-1.0 OR T1.1 SITE PLAN. PLEASE CLEARLY |
| | MARK THE AREA AND PROVIDE INDICATION OF ITS LOCATION |
| | WITHIN THE DRAWING IN THE COMMENT RESPONSE. |
| | 14) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE |
| | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, |
| | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES |
| | 15) NOT SATISFIED. IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN |
| | PLAN, PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING |
| | AND PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE |
| | NUMBER OF METERED STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR |
| | RELOCATED, IF ANY. PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETE RESPONSE, |
| | THERE ARE FOUR STREETS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT, AND INCLUDE A TABLE AS REQUESTED |
| | 16) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? |
| | IF SO, CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK |
| | DISTANCE FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK. ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
| | IS NOT SUFFICIENT, PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETE RESPONSE. |
| | 17) NOT SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED OR |
| | CONTEMPLATED IN THE FUTURE? PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETE |
| | RESPONSE. IF THERE IS A POSSIBILITY FOR VALET |
| | OPERATIONS IN THE FUTURE, PLEASE PROVIDE AN OPERATIONAL |
| | ANALYSIS; OTHERWISE A CONDITION THAT VALET OPERATIONS |
| | ARE NOT ALLOWED AT ANY TIME, UNLESS COMPLETELY WITHIN |
| | THE PROPERTY WILL BE IMPOSED |
| | 18) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE REASONING |
| | OR NECESSITY OF TWO EXIT LANES AT THE FERN ST DRIVEWAY. |
| | A VARIANCE REQUEST MUST BE SUBMITTED. |
| | 19) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE |
| | PARKING AREA ON DIXIE. PLEASE DESIGNATE SUCH STALL AS |
| | TEMPORARY COMMERCIAL LOADING/UNLOADING, DELIVERY AND |
| | SHARE DRIVING ONLY. |
| | 20) NOT SATISFIED. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED DRIVEWAY WIDTH |
| | IS 24 FEET. THE GARDENIA AND FERN ST DRIVEWAYS WARRANT |
| | A VARIANCE REQUEST |
| | 21) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE 94-312(2)(A): |
| | ???THE NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS TO SERVE A SITE SHALL BE |
| | KEPT AT A MINIMUM AND SHALL BE EVALUATED ON A CASE BY |
| | CASE BASIS???. FOR SAFETY AND OPERATIONAL PURPOSES, |
| | ACCESS SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED FROM THE LOWEST FUNCTIONAL |
| | CLASS OF ROADWAY HAVING FRONTAGE ON THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT. THUS, THE DRIVEWAY UNTO S DIXIE HIGHWAY |
| | SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED, AS BOTH FERN ST AND GARDENIA ST |
| | CAN ACCOMMODATE ANY ACCESS NEEDS, WHILE THE PROPOSED |
| | DRIVEWAYS WOULD BE TOO DISRUPTIVE TO VEHICULAR AND |
| | PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS ALONG DIXIE.FURTHER DISCUSSION |
| | WILL BE PERFORMED BASED ON THE UPDATED DRIVEWAY DESIGN. |
| | 22) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE GARAGE RAMPS SLOPES |
| | 23) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CLEARLY MARK/CALLOUT THE |
| | TURNAROUND SPACES AT THE GARAGE DEAD-ENDS |
| | 24) BIKE LANES ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERN ST ARE |
| | ENCROACHING THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY. PLEASE RE-DESIGN |
| | ACCORDINGLY |
| | 25) CONSIDER SHIFTING THE BIKE LANES AND REMOVING THE |
| | ON-STREET PARKING ON THE EAST LEG OF THE FERN/QUADRILLE |
| | INTERSECTION ALONG THE SOUTHERN SIDE OF FERN ST, SO TO |
| | ALLOW INSTALLATION OF A WESTBOUND LEFT-TURN STORAGE |
| | LANE |
| | 26) PROVIDE A DEDICATED TRAFFIC FOLDER/ZIP-FILE |
| | CONTAINING ALL RELATED ITEMS IN FUTURE RESUBMISSIONS, |
| | INCLUSIVE OF PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FILES (I.E. FDOT |
| | LETTER) |
| | 27) PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE |
| | REFER TO CITY CODE SEC 86-246 FOR DETAILS. THIS COMMENT |
| | COULD BE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL, AND MUST BE SATISFIED |
| | BEFORE ENGINEERING PERMITTING IS ISSUED |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
