Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z22050021
Project Number Z22050021
Review Stop TRAFFIC
Sequence Number 3
Notes
Date Text
2022-08-22 20:54:19TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. GIVEN THE SENSITIVE LOCATION OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, A METHODOLOGY MEETING SHALL BE
 SCHEDULED FOR A COMPREHENSIVE TRAFFIC STUDY
 2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A THOROUGH VALET
 SERVICE/QUEUE ANALYSIS. SHEET A1.02 SHOWS A THIRD VALET
 LOCATION, WHICH IS NOT MENTIONED IN THE ANALYSIS.
 MOREOVER, VALET SPACES MUST BE IDENTIFIED IN THE SITE
 PLANS, ANALYSIS MUST INCLUDE MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS,
 PROCESS TIME MUST BE CALCULATED AND PROPERLY BROKEN
 DOWN (I.E. ACCEPTANCE/DELIVERY PROCESSING TIME AT VALET
 STAND, DRIVE UP/DOWN TIME, WALK UP/DOWN TIME). FULL
 PATH FROM STAND TO PARKING STALLS MUST BE SHOWN, NOT
 JUST GROUND OPERATIONS
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE RECEIVED
 4) SATISFIED. PROVIDE FDOT D4 ACCESS MANAGEMENT LETTER,
 ONCE RECEIVED
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 5) NOT SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE
 BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS)
 ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND
 SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES. REQUEST IS FOR A
 CLEAN SITE PLAN, SHOWCASING AND HIGHLIGHTING
 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENTS (E.G. NO UNDERGROUND UTILITY
 DETAILS, ONLY SURFACE ITEMS SUCH AS POLES AND BASINS).
 ALSO, NONE OF THE CIVIL OR ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE
 SHOWCASING PAVEMENTS MARKINGS AND LANE WIDTHS OF THE
 SURROUNDING ROADWAY NETWORK. PLEASE PROVIDE A DEDICATED
 AND DETAILED TRANSPORTATION-ORIENTED SITE PLAN. SEVERAL
 SIDEWALKS, LANES,
 6) SATISFIED. SHEET C-102, RIGHT DRAWING. WB-40
 MANEUVERING SHOWS ENCROACHMENT WITH THE INTERNAL
 SIDEWALK BY THE DROP-OFF AREA. IS THAT PORTION OF THE
 WALKWAY CURB LESS?
 7) SATISFIED. SHEET A1.04 TO 06, PROVIDE AND CLEARLY
 MARK TURNAROUND SPACE AT THE SOUTHERN DEAD-END
 8) SATISFIED. SHEET A1.07, PROVIDE AND CLEARLY MARK
 TURNAROUND SPACE AT THE SOUTHERN AND NORTHERN DEAD-ENDS
 9) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY
 ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20
 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. FOR
 THE LATTER ITEM, MORE SPECIFICALLY: A CONDUIT (2?
 SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL
 PULL BOX (240V ? 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE
 DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE.
 10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE NUMBER AND LOCATION OF BICYCLE
 PARKING
 11) SATISFIED. A MINIMUM OF 2 ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACES MUST BE PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE THOSE
 STALLS
 12) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE 10 FEET WIDE SIDEWALKS
 AROUND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THIS ITEM WILL BE
 REVIEWED AND CLEARED ONCE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC
 SITE PLAN IS PROVIDED. CODE REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 8
 FEET, BUT CONSIDERING THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT AND THE POTENTIAL FOR HIGH PEDESTRIAN
 TRAFFIC, WIDER SIDEWALKS ARE RECOMMENDED.
 13) REMOVE/RELOCATE THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND INSTALLED IN
 THE MIDDLE OF THE SIDEWALK ALONG DIXIE AND OKEECHOBEE
 OR PROVIDE A JUSTIFICATION. SUCH FEATURES ARE
 SIGNIFICANTLY SPLITTING AND REDUCING THE WALKABLE AREA
 14) SATISFIED. REMOVE THE PARALLEL PARKING STALLS ON
 DIXIE
 15) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. MAKE THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY ON
 LAKEVIEW AVE EXIT ONLY. PROVIDE A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
 QUANTIFYING THE INCREASE IN TRAFFIC, IF ANY. DRIVEWAY
 CONFIGURATION OF NEARBY BUILDINGS IS NOT A SUFFICIENT
 JUSTIFICATION. PER THE FDOT DOCUMENT: ?THIS LETTER DOES
 NOT GUARANTEE PERMIT APPROVAL. THE PERMIT MAY BE DENIED
 BASED ON THE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED ENGINEERING
 PLANS?. CONSIDERING THE VICINITY OF THE GARAGE RAMP AND
 THE HOTEL VALET OPERATION TO THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY,
 THERE ARE A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF CONFLICT POINTS
 NEGATIVELY AFFECTING THE INTERNAL CIRCULATION, WITH A
 SIGNIFICANT INCREASE OF POTENTIAL SPILLBACKS INTO
 OKEECHOBEE BLVD. THE ONE-WAY EXIT ONLY IS STRONGLY
 RECOMMENDED
 16) PARTIALLY SATISFIED CONSIDER MAKING THE SOUTHERN
 DRIVEWAY ON OKEECHOBEE BLVD ENTRY ONLY. PROVIDE A
 TRAFFIC. ANALYSIS QUANTIFYING THE INCREASE IN TRAFFIC.
 PROVIDE A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS QUANTIFYING THE INCREASE IN
 TRAFFIC, IF ANY. DRIVEWAY CONFIGURATION OF NEARBY
 BUILDINGS IS NOT A SUFFICIENT JUSTIFICATION. PER THE
 FDOT DOCUMENT: ?THIS LETTER DOES NOT GUARANTEE PERMIT
 APPROVAL. THE PERMIT MAY BE DENIED BASED ON THE REVIEW
 OF THE SUBMITTED ENGINEERING PLANS?. IF THE NORTHERN
 DRIVEWAY WERE TO BE CONFIGURED AS EXIT ONLY, THE
 SOUTHERN ONE COULD BE FULL ACCESS
 17) HAS THE WESTBOUND LEFT-TURN STORAGE LANE ON
 LAKEVIEW AVE BEEN SHORTENED BECAUSE OF THE PROPOSED
 NORTHERN DRIVEWAY LOCATION? PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILED
 MEASUREMENTS OF THE STORAGE LANE ON THE SITE PLAN
 18) THE FDOT LETTER AUTHORIZED THE INSTALLATION OF BOTH
 THE NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN DRIVEWAYS APPROXIMATELY 150
 FEET FROM DIXIE AND 330 FEET FROM OLIVE. PLEASE
 SHOWCASE SUCH DISTANCES ON THE SITE PLAN
 19) SHOWCASE ALL THE DISTANCES AND FEATURES MENTIONED
 OR REQUESTED IN THE FDOT LETTER
 20) PEDESTRIAN RAMPS ARE MISSING
 21) SIDEWALK WIDTHS ARE MISSING ON SEVERAL LOCATIONS
 22) INTERNAL DRIVEWAYS, LANES AND WALKWAYS MUST BE
 DIMENSIONED
 23) SHOWCASE AND DIMENSION THE REQUIRED VISIBILITY
 TRIANGLES
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved