| Date |
Text |
| 2022-06-08 08:22:40 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE APPLICANT HOLD OUTREACH |
| | MEETINGS WITH THE RESIDENTS OF ONE CITY PLAZA |
| | CONDOMINIUM, AS THE PROPOSE PROJECT WILL HAVE A DIRECT |
| | IMPACT ON THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL CONDO BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 2.) ALTHOUGH THE PROJECT IS WITHIN THE TRAFFIC |
| | CONCURRENCY EXCEPTION AREA (TCEA), A LETTER FROM THE |
| | PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION, IS STILL REQUIRED. |
| | PLEASE CONTACT THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION |
| | AT (561) 684-4030 FOR INFORMATION ON HOW TO OBTAIN THE |
| | REQUIRED TRAFFIC LETTER. |
| | |
| | 3.) A PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE FLORIDA |
| | DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) SHALL BE REQUIRED |
| | FOR THE PROPOSED ACCESS POINTS AND/OR STREETSCAPE |
| | IMPROVEMENTS ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HWY, LAKEVIEW AVENUE AND |
| | OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD (FDOT CONTROLLED ROWS). THIS |
| | PREDETERMINATION LETTER IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE |
| | SCHEDULING OF THIS APPLICATION FOR THE DOWNTOWN ACTION |
| | COMMITTEE (DAC) TO ENSURE THE ACCESS POINTS AND |
| | STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS ARE FEASIBLE. |
| | |
| | 4.) ACCORDING TO THE PARKING CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN |
| | THE PLAN SHEETS, THE SOFT MAXIMUM HAS BEEN EXCEEDED |
| | (BUT NOT OVER 50%), AND THEREFORE, A CONTRIBUTION TO |
| | THE TRANSIT OPERATION FUND WILL BE REQUIRED. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-111] |
| | |
| | 5.) ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE OBD SHALL OBTAIN |
| | LEED CERTIFICATION FROM THE LEADERSHIP ON ENVIRONMENTAL |
| | DESIGN (LEED) OR A SIMILAR NATIONALLY ACCREDITED |
| | ORGANIZATION. ALL REQUIREMENTS AND TIMEFRAMES SHALL BE |
| | MET PURSUANT TO SEC. 941-35(E.)(2.)(5.). |
| | |
| | 6.) ALL BUILDING SETBACKS SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE |
| | BACK OF CURB. PLAN SHEETS SHOWS THAT THE SETBACK |
| | DIMENSIONS WERE TAKEN FROM THE FRONT OF THE CURB, WHICH |
| | IS INCORRECT. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 7.) PLEASE ENSURE ALL PLAN SHEETS MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY |
| | (I.E. SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, CIVIL PLANS, ETC.). |
| | |
| | 8.) AT LEAST ONE HARD COPY SET OF FULL COLORED |
| | PLANS/DRAWINGS (I.E. ELEVATIONS, FAR CALCULATIONS |
| | SHEETS, ETC.) SHALL BE REQUIRED IN ALL FUTURE |
| | RESUBMITTALS. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE ENTIRE BUILDING FRONTAGE ALONG SOUTH DIXIE |
| | HIGHWAY, INCLUDING THE GROUND LEVEL, SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | WITHIN THE MINIMUM (16 FEET) AND MAXIMUM (30 FEET) |
| | BUILDING SETBACK RANGE. THE PROPOSED BUILDING FRONTAGE |
| | ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY (A PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN STREET) |
| | APPEARS TO BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THIS SETBACK RANGE. |
| | THIS CAN BE ADDRESSED BY RECONFIGURING THE HOTEL LOBBY |
| | SPACE TO MEET THE REQUIRED BUILDING SETBACKS. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-135, TABLE IV-70] |
| | |
| | 2.) THE PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE (PLAZA) AREA SHALL |
| | ABUT ACTIVE USES ON A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) SIDES. THIS |
| | REQUIREMENT IS CURRENTLY NOT MET; THE PLAZA AREA |
| | CURRENTLY ABUTS ACTIVE USE ONLY ON ONE (1) SIDE. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-108, TABLE IV-7] |
| | |
| | 3.) THE STAIRWELL LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING ALONG |
| | LAKEVIEW AVENUE, AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE GROUND |
| | LEVEL CAFE SHALL BE RELOCATED AWAY FROM THE CORNER. |
| | EFFORT SHALL BE MADE TO CONCEAL THE STAIRWELL FROM THE |
| | BUILDING FRONTAGE BY ACTIVE USES ALONG THIS PROMINENT |
| | PEDESTRIAN STREET FRONTAGE (I.E. PUSH THE STAIRWELL |
| | BACK INTO THE SPACE). |
| | |
| | 4.) THE CONDITIONAL SETBACK (MINIMUM OF 31 FT.) SHALL |
| | APPLY TO ALL STORIES ABOVE THE 5TH STORY TO CONCEAL ALL |
| | PARKING AND/OR NON-ACTIVE USE LINERS. THIS REQUIREMENT |
| | HAS NOT BEEN MET ALONG LAKEVIEW AVENUE. [ZLDR S.94-135, |
| | TABLE IV-70] |
| | |
| | 5.) THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT CANNOT EXCEED 60% AT THE 6TH |
| | AND 7TH LEVELS, UNLESS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | CONDITIONAL SETBACK. THE CONDITIONAL SETBACK |
| | REQUIREMENT HAS NOT BEEN MET TO ALLOW FOR A GREATER |
| | BUILDING FOOTPRINT FOR PARKING BEYOND THE MAXIMUM 60% |
| | FOR THESE LEVELS. [ZLDR S.94-135, TABLE IV-70] |
| | |
| | 6.) MINIMUM ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENTS ALONG THE STREET |
| | FRONTAGES CANNOT BE VERIFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS |
| | (I.E. LF) FOR ALL ACTIVE USE AREAS SO THAT STAFF CAN |
| | VERIFY THE CALCULATIONS. ALSO, PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | NON-ACTIVE USES, SUCH AS MAILROOMS, STORAGE, ETC., |
| | SHALL NOT BE COUNTED TOWARDS THE MINIMUM ACTIVE USE |
| | REQUIREMENT; SOME OF THESE USES HAVE BEEN INCLUDED |
| | TOWARDS THE ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS WHICH |
| | IS INCORRECT. [ZLDR S.94-135, TABLE IV-70] |
| | |
| | 7.) THE MINIMUM ACTIVE USE LINER DEPTH FOR COMMERCIAL |
| | USES IS 20 FT. ABOVE THE GROUND LEVEL. THERE ARE |
| | EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM HOTEL OFFICES ALONG THE |
| | LAKEVIEW FRONTAGE THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THIS |
| | MINIMUM REQUIREMENT (PROVIDED IS 15 FT.). [ZLDR |
| | S.94-135, TABLE IV-70] |
| | |
| | 8.) PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FOR ALL AREAS IN THE |
| | ACTIVE USE LINER DEPTH CALCULATIONS TO DEMONSTRATE |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDRS. [ZLDR S.94-135, TABLE IV-70] |
| | |
| | 9.) THERE ARE SOME ABBREVIATED NOTES THAT STAFF IS |
| | UNFAMILIAR WITH (I.E. FCC, BOH, T, RVG, FO, PR, HK, L, |
| | ETC.) TO DEFINE SPACES IN THE PLAN SHEETS. PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY WHAT THESE SPACES ARE IN THE PLANS SO THAT |
| | STAFF CAN DETERMINE IF THESE SPACES QUALIFY IN THE |
| | ACTIVE USE, FAR, ETC. CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 10.) PLEASE EXPLAIN THE ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT ROOM. |
| | STAFF NEEDS TO DETERMINE IF THIS SPACE IS CONSIDERED AN |
| | ACTIVE OR NON-ACTIVE USE. THIS SPACE SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN |
| | INCLUDED IN THE ACTIVE USE CALCULATIONS ALONG LAKEVIEW |
| | AVE. (LEVEL 3). |
| | |
| | 11.) PLEASE EXPLAIN THE "DOG RUN" AREA. IT WOULD BE |
| | HELPFUL TO DESIGN THE SPACE WITH FURNISHINGS TO CONFIRM |
| | THAT THE SPACE IS NOT AN EMPTY SPACE WITHIN THE |
| | PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 12.) WHAT TYPE OF STORAGE IS PROVIDED ON LEVELS 2 |
| | THROUGH 7? PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION/CLARIFY IN |
| | THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 13.) THE STORAGE AREA SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED ON THE |
| | ROOFTOP OF THE BUILDING. ACCORDING TO THE PLANS, AN |
| | ENCLOSED STORAGE AREA IS PROVIDED ON THE ROOFTOP. |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS. [ZLDR S.94-109, TABLE IV-5] |
| | |
| | 14.) PLEASE CLEARLY LABEL/DEFINE ALL SPACES IN THE |
| | PLANS (I.E. BICYCLE STORAGE AREA). |
| | |
| | 15.) PLEASE EXPLAIN THE BREAKDOWN OF BUILDING SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE FOR RETAIL + RESTAURANT = 15,720 SQ. FT. THE |
| | CALCULATIONS DO NOT ADD UP. |
| | |
| | 16.) FAR CALCULATIONS SHALL INCLUDE ALL FULLY ENCLOSED |
| | STORAGE SPACES (AIR CONDITIONED AND NON-AIR |
| | CONDITIONED), STAIRS AND ELEVATORS, ENCLOSED AREAS ON |
| | THE ROOFTOP, EXTERNAL UNENCLOSED CIRCULATION AREAS, |
| | ETC. (PLEASE REFER TO THE DEFINITION FOR "GROSS |
| | BUILDING AREA"). THERE ARE SOME SPACES IN THE PLANS |
| | THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE FAR CALCULATIONS |
| | BUT HAVE BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE CALCULATIONS. PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE FAR IN OBD-25 |
| | SUBDISTRICT IS 7.0. [ZLDR S.94-135, TABLE IV-70] |
| | |
| | |
| | PARKING REQUIREMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PLEASE CHECK THE PARKING CALCULATIONS. THERE SEEMS |
| | TO BE ERRORS IN THE CALCULATIONS (I.E. PARKING COUNT |
| | DOES NOT MATCH THE PARKING PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN). |
| | PLEASE CORRECT ANY ERRORS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 2.) PARKING SPACES FOR THE DISABLED SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | ACCORDING TO SUBSECTION 94-485(O) OF THE ZLDRS. |
| | ACCORDING TO THE PARKING CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROJECT, |
| | THE DISABLE PARKING REQUIREMENT HAS NOT BEEN MET. THE |
| | ZLDRS REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 2% OF PARKING PROVIDED FOR |
| | THE DISABLED. [ZLDR S.94-111 AND S94-485(O)]. |
| | |
| | 3.) PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE |
| | PLANS. PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE |
| | GENERAL PARKING STANDARDS ACCORDING TO ZLDR |
| | S.94-111(C). |
| | |
| | 4.) THE PLANS IMPLY THAT THERE WILL BE COMPACT PARKING |
| | SPACES. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPACT PARKING SPACE |
| | CALCULATIONS AND IDENTIFY WHERE THE COMPACT PARKING |
| | SPACES WILL BE LOCATED IN THE PROJECT. PROVIDED COMPACT |
| | PARKING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ZLDR |
| | S.94-485. |
| | |
| | 5.) THE PROJECT PROPOSES MECHANICAL PARKING. MECHANICAL |
| | PARKING SHALL REQUIRE A COMMERCIAL ATTENDANT AT ALL |
| | HOURS (24/7/365). SUCH OPERATION SHALL BE ENFORCED |
| | THROUGH A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC |
| | RECORDS. ALL RESTRICTIVE COVENANT AND OTHER DOCUMENTS |
| | REQUIRED TO BE RECORDED SHALL BE ON CITY-APPROVED FORMS |
| | AND RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS. [ZLDR S.94-111] |
| | |
| | 6.) THE PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM LOADING |
| | REQUIREMENTS IN ZLDR S.94-485. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | CALCULATIONS AND DIMENSIONS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. |
| | [ZLDR S.94-111 AND S.94-485] |
| | |
| | 7.) WHY IS THE INGRESS AND EGRESS POINTS SO WIDE ALONG |
| | OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD? PLEASE JUSTIFY AND PROVIDE |
| | SUPPORT/BACKUP MATERIAL (I.E. AUTO-TURN DIAGRAM), AS |
| | STAFF RECOMMENDS THE INGRESS/EGRESS POINT IS REDUCED TO |
| | 24 FT. WIDE. |
| | |
| | 8.) PARKING ENTRANCE/EXIT/DRIVEWAY SHALL NOT BE WIDER |
| | THAN 25 FT. AS MEASURED PARALLEL TO THE STREET AT THE |
| | CURB. THE DRIVEWAY SEEMS TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM |
| | ALLOWABLE WIDTH ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-111(O)] |
| | |
| | 9.) ALL NEW PROJECTS SHALL PROVIDE A FREIGHT DELIVERY |
| | PLAN AND ROUTES TO ENSURE DELIVERIES DO NOT IMPACT |
| | TRAFFIC OPERATIONS. THERE DOES NOT SEEM TO BE A FREIGHT |
| | DELIVERY PLAN WITH THE PROJECT APPLICATION. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-135(E)(2)(4)(C.)] |
| | |
| | 10.) ALL NEW PROJECTS SHALL PROVIDE A CURB SIDE |
| | MANAGEMENT PLAN TO PRIORITIZE MULTIMODAL TRAVEL. THERE |
| | DOES NOT SEEM TO BE A CURB SIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN [ZLDR |
| | S.94-135(E)(2)(4)(D.)] |
| | |
| | 11.) HOW IS THE REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING MET FOR THE |
| | PROJECT? BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN SEC. 94-111 OF THE ZLDRS. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS, PROPOSED |
| | RACK AND STORAGE/CHANGE ROOM/SHOWER FACILITY LOCATION |
| | SHALL BE CLEAR IN THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | |
| | STREETSCAPE COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) A SIDEWALK WITH A MINIMUM OF 8 FT. CLEAR WIDTH |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE BUILDING FRONTAGE. PRIVATE |
| | SIDEWALKS WHICH SERVE AS AN EXTENSION OF THE PUBLIC |
| | SIDEWALK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE STREETSCAPE |
| | REQUIREMENTS, SHALL MATCH THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK IN DESIGN |
| | AND MATERIAL, AND SHALL PROVIDE A SEAMLESS TRANSITION |
| | BETWEEN THE TWO. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE IN THE PLANS AND |
| | PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO ILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | ZLDRS. [ZLDR S.94-113(D.)(1)] |
| | |
| | 2.) BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED AT A MINIMUM OF |
| | ONE (1) SPACE PER EVERY 100 FT. OF STREET FRONTAGE. |
| | SPECIFICATIONS SHALL MEET CITY APPROVED STANDARDS. |
| | PLEASE INCLUDE A BICYCLE RACK DETAIL. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-113(D)(9)] |
| | |
| | 3.) DRIVEWAYS AND CURB CUTS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO |
| | MINIMIZE THE NEGATIVE IMPACT IN THE PEDESTRIAN PATH OF |
| | TRAVEL. DRIVEWAYS SHALL MAINTAIN THE SIDEWALK |
| | ELEVATION. PLEASE PROVIDE A SECTION PARALLEL TO THE |
| | STREET TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-113(D.)(10.)] |
| | |
| | 4.) EXISTING SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO ONE CITY PLAZA SEEMS |
| | TO BE INCONSISTENT. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR ACCURACY AND |
| | ALSO SHOW HOW THE PROPOSED STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS FOR |
| | THE PROJECT WILL CONNECT TO THE EXISTING STREETSCAPE OF |
| | THE ADJACENT PROJECT(S). |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PLANAR BREAKS AT THE GROUND LEVEL AND PODIUM: FOR |
| | BUILDING FRONTAGES GREATER THAN 150 FT., NO FACADE |
| | SHALL EXCEED 60% OF THE BUILDING FRONTAGE WITHOUT |
| | PROVIDING A PLANAR BREAK OR MULTIPLE PLANAR BREAKS A |
| | MINIMUM OF 3 FT. IN DEPTH. THE CUMULATIVE HORIZONAL |
| | LENGTH OF ALL PLANAR BREAKS SHALL BE GREATER THAN OR |
| | EQUAL TO 20% OF THE BUILDING FRONTAGE; BLANK WALLS ARE |
| | NOT PERMITTED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS, DIMENSIONS, |
| | ETC., IN THE PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS |
| | REQUIREMENT. THE PLANS PROVIDED |
| | DOES NOT SEEM TO COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT. [TABLE |
| | IV-4] |
| | |
| | 2.) PER THE ZLDRS, "TRANSPARENCY" IS DEFINED AS |
| | "BUILDING FENESTRATION ON NON-RESIDENTIAL USES WHICH |
| | ALLOWS GROUND FLOOR VISUAL ACCESS BETWEEN A BUILDING |
| | AND ITS ACTIVE USES FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK." THE |
| | TRANSPARENCY CALCULATIONS APPEARS TO BE |
| | INCONSISTENT/INCORRECT WITH THE ELEVATIONS/RENDERINGS |
| | PROVIDED IN THE PLAN SET (I.E. STAIRWELL WITHIN THE |
| | NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE BUILDING DOES NOT MEET THE |
| | DEFINITION OF TRANSPARENCY AND DOES NOT COUNT TOWARDS |
| | THE REQUIRED CALCULATIONS AS PROVIDED IN THE |
| | TRANSPARENCY CALCULATIONS IN THE PLAN SET). PLEASE |
| | CHECK TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENTS AND CORRECT AS |
| | NECESSARY FOR CONSISTENCY. [ZLDR S.94-109 AND S.94-135, |
| | TABLE IV-70] |
| | |
| | 3.) FOR THE EAST ELEVATION (SHEET A2.03), PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE A PROFILE OF THE ADJACENT ONE CITY PLAZA CONDO |
| | BUILDING TO SHOW HOW THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL IMPACT |
| | THE ADJACENT USE. ADDITIONAL SECTION DRAWINGS MAY BE |
| | REQUIRED TO ILLUSTRATE IMPACT. PLEASE CONTACT CRAIG |
| | MCPHERSON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT-CSD CUSTOMER |
| | SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE @ (561) 805-6684, TO OBTAIN THE |
| | ACCURATE DRAWINGS FOR ONE CITY PLAZA TO ASSIST WITH THE |
| | EXERCISE. |
| | |
| | |
| | SIGNAGE: |
| | |
| | 1.) WILL THERE BE ANY SIGNAGE PROPOSED FOR THIS |
| | PROJECT? IF SO, PLEASE PROVIDE THE INFORMATION ON THE |
| | PROPOSED SIGNAGE. IF PROJECT SIGNAGE HAS YET TO BE |
| | DETERMINED, A NOTE STATING THAT ALL PROJECT SIGNAGE |
| | SHALL COMPLY WITH SEC. 94-110, OF THE ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) WILL BE REQUIRED IN THE |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR |
| | (4) PAPER COPIES, ONE REDUCED COPY IN 11 INCHES X 17 |
| | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND |
| | DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | *ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE |
| | ($500.00). |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @@ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
