| Date |
Text |
| 2022-07-21 10:15:15 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 07.21.2022 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z22050020 |
| | CASE NO.: PB 1105E |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. PER THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: |
| | |
| | 1.1. SATISFIED - THE SURVEY SHALL BE PROVIDED IN |
| | ELECTRONIC FORMAT (PDF). |
| | |
| | 1.2. SATISFIED - THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT (WORD). |
| | |
| | 1.3. SATISFIED - A $212 ENGINEERING SERVICES FEE IS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 2. SATISFIED - A SCANNED VERSION OF A SCAD APPLICATION |
| | WAS INCLUDED IN THE SUBMITTAL ? WAS THIS APPLICATION |
| | EVER SIGNED BY THE CITY? HAS IT BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE |
| | SCHOOL DISTRICT? PLEASE PROVIDE A STATUS. |
| | |
| | 3. SATISFIED - THE SURVEY INDICATES THAT THE |
| | WESTERN-MOST PARKING IS CONTAINED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES |
| | OF THE PROPERTY (AS PART OF ?PARCEL TWO?), BUT THIS IS |
| | SHOWN ON THE PROPERTY APPRAISER?S WEBSITE AS BEING A |
| | PART OF A PARCEL OWNED BY FEC RAILWAY LLC AND IS THE |
| | RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. PLEASE CLARIFY. NOTE THAT IF |
| | THIS PARKING IS BEING INCLUDED, THE MAIL LIST, MAP, |
| | ETC. ALL NEED TO BE UPDATED. |
| | |
| | 4. SATISFIED - SQUARE FOOTAGE AND ACREAGE SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED ON THE SURVEY FOR THE LAND AREA OF EACH |
| | PARCEL. CONFIRM THAT ALL STUDIES, ETC. UTILIZE THIS |
| | CORRECT LAND AREA. |
| | |
| | 5. SATISFIED, EVALUATION WILL BE PROVIDED AS PART OF |
| | THE STAFF REPORT - WHILE NO DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED AT |
| | THIS TIME, CONCEPTUAL MASSING STUDIES SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | TO INDICATE VARIOUS BUILD-OUT SCENARIOS UNDER THE |
| | PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 6. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ISSUED BY ALEX |
| | HANSEN, CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLANNER, AND SHALL BE |
| | ADDRESSED ACCORDINGLY: |
| | |
| | 6.1. SATISFIED - THE FLU AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS |
| | PREPARED BY KIMLEY HORN DATED MAY 9, 2022, STATES IN |
| | ITS CONCLUSION THAT, BECAUSE OF TRAFFIC LIMITATIONS, |
| | THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS WOULD BE IN PLACE FOR THE |
| | AMENDMENT: |
| | |
| | - RESTRICTED MAXIMUM DAILY NON-RESIDENTIAL TRIPS: |
| | 18,903 DAILY TRIPS |
| | - RESTRICTED MAXIMUM AM PEAK HOUR NON-RESIDENTIAL |
| | TRIPS: 567 PEAK HOUR TRIPS |
| | - RESTRICTED MAXIMUM PM PEAK HOUR NON-RESIDENTIAL |
| | TRIPS: 1,931 PEAK HOUR TRIPS |
| | |
| | ANY TYPE OF TRAFFIC RESTRICTION PLACED ON THIS FLU |
| | AMENDMENT SHOULD APPLY TO ALL THE TRIPS GENERATED BY |
| | THE AMENDMENT AND SHOULD NOT BE LIMITED ONLY TO |
| | ?NON-RESIDENTIAL TRIPS?. RESIDENTIAL USES ARE NOT |
| | EXEMPT FROM THE FLU AMENDMENT TRAFFIC REQUIREMENTS. THE |
| | TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 6.2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - THE FLU AMENDMENT LOS |
| | ANALYSIS INCLUDED IN THE APPLICATION ONLY INCLUDES THE |
| | SUMMARY LOS TABLE AND DOES NOT INCLUDE THE FULL LOS |
| | ANALYSIS AS REQUIRED. IN ADDITION, THE APPLICATION DOES |
| | NOT INCLUDE A WRITTEN CONFIRMATION FROM THE APPLICABLE |
| | SERVICE AGENCIES INDICATING THAT SUFFICIENT CAPACITY |
| | EXISTS TO ACCOMMODATE THE BUILDOUT OF THE PROPOSED FLU |
| | DESIGNATION. THE LOS ANALYSIS NEEDS TO BE REVISED |
| | ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 6.2.1 NEW COMMENT - ?TABLE 3: CHANGE IN POTABLE WATER |
| | DEMAND? NEEDS TO BE REVISED. FOR THE EXISTING |
| | COMMERCIAL (C) FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION, THE |
| | APPLICANT SHOULD USE A POTABLE DEMAND RATE OF .20 |
| | GALLONS PER DAY PER SQUARE FEET (GPD/SF). BASED ON MY |
| | CALCULATIONS THIS SHOULD RESULT ON AN EXISTING TOTAL |
| | POTENTIAL DEMAND OF 138,822 GPD. FOR THE PROPOSED |
| | COMMERCIAL EAST (CE) FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION, THE |
| | APPLICANT NEEDS TO USE THE POTABLE OF DEMAND RATE OF |
| | 272 GALLONS PER CAPITA PER DAY (GPCPD). SINCE THE MOST |
| | RECENT CENSUS DATA INDICATES THAT THE CITY?S PERSON PER |
| | HOUSEHOLD (PPH) RATE IS AROUND 2.5, I CALCULATED THE |
| | TOTAL POTENTIAL DEMAND FOR THE PROPOSED CE FLU TO BE |
| | THE FOLLOWING: 685 UNITS X 2.5 PPD = 1,712,5 X 272 |
| | (GPCPD) = 465,800 GPD. AS A RESULT, THE NET CHANGE IN |
| | POTABLE WATER DEMAND SHOULD BE 326,978 GPD. |
| | |
| | 6.2.2 NEW COMMENT - IN ADDITION TO THE ?FULL? LOS |
| | ANALYSIS, THE APPLICATION NEEDS TO INCLUDE A REVISED |
| | LOS SUMMARY TABLE THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DATA IN |
| | THE FULL ANALYSIS. THE APPLICANT PROVIDED A LOS SUMMARY |
| | TABLE IN THE FIRST SUBMITTAL BUT SOME OF THE DATA TABLE |
| | IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE MOST RECENT DATA IN THE FULL |
| | ANALYSIS. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF ALL REVISED PLANS AND/OR |
| | DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | F) TO BE PLACED ON THE AUGUST 16, 2022, PLANNING BOARD |
| | AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER |
| | THAN AUGUST 1, 2022. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND BE |
| | INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S |
| | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH |
| | REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE. |
| | |
| | G) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT |
| | DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE |
| | COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | TTY: 800.955.8771 |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
