| Date |
Text |
| 2022-12-14 16:16:50 | CASE NO. PB 950GGGGGG |
| | ROSEMARY SQUARE GARAGE EV INSTALLATIONS |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446, |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO |
| | (2) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF |
| | THESE COMMENTS (BY FEBRUARY 14, 2023), THE PLANNING |
| | DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE CASE IS |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE |
| | A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($60). |
| | |
| | THE MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT COVERS THREE EV |
| | INSTALLATIONS WITHIN ROSEMARY SQUARE. |
| | |
| | 530 HIBISCUS - PASSED WITH CONDITION. |
| | |
| | CONDITION: THE H FRAME AND THE EQUIPMENT MOUNTED ON IT |
| | IS SHOWN BEHIND THE EXISTING LOW HEDGE AND GENERALLY |
| | BEHIND AN EXISTING PALM TREE. SINCE THERE WILL BE NO |
| | NEW PODOCARPUS HEDGE INSTALLED AT THIS LOCATION, THE |
| | FRAME, PANEL, CONDUIT, METER, ETC. MOUNTED TO THE FRAME |
| | MUST BE PAINTED GREEN AS ADDITIONAL SCREENING. |
| | |
| | 620 HIBISCUS - FAILED |
| | |
| | 1) THE COMMENTS LISTED BELOW MUST BE CORRECTED NOT ONLY |
| | ON THE BUILDING PERMIT, BUT ALSO AS PART OF THE MINOR |
| | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT THAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED |
| | TO THE PLANNING DIVISION. |
| | |
| | 2) THE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE |
| | DIMENSION SITE PLAN AND THE SURVEY. THE SURVEY SHOWS A |
| | TOTAL OF 60 FEET BETWEEN THE EXTERIOR PARKING GARAGE |
| | WALL COLUMNS AND THE INTERIOR GARAGE COLUMNS. THE |
| | 60-FOOT WIDTH IS THE MINIMUM NECESSARY TO PROVIDE TWO |
| | 18-FOOT DEEP PARKING STALLS AND THE 24-FOOT WIDE DRIVE |
| | AISLE MEETING CODE REQUIREMENTS. THE DIMENSION SITE |
| | PLAN SHOWS THE NEW EV CHARGING UNITS AND SIGNS LOCATED |
| | APPROXIMATELY 1-FOOT INSIDE OF THE EXTERIOR WALL, |
| | RESULTING IN THERE BEING EITHER INSUFFICIENT DEPTH OF |
| | THE EV SPACES OR A REDUCTION IN THE REQUIRED DRIVE |
| | AISLE WIDTH. PROVIDE A FULL DIMENSIONED CROSS SECTION |
| | FROM THE EXTERIOR TO THE CENTER OF THE GARAGE SHOWING |
| | ACCURATE DIMENSIONS FOR THE SPACES ON BOTH SIDES OF THE |
| | DRIVE AISLE AND THE DRIVE AISLE THAT MEET CODE. PROVIDE |
| | A DIMENSIONED DRAWING OF THE EV CHARGING UNIT THAT |
| | INCLUDES THE DEPTH OF THE UNIT IN PLAN AND ELEVATION. |
| | THE EV CHARGING UNIT DIMENSION AND SIGN LOCATION SHALL |
| | BE ACCURATELY SHOWN ON THE DIMENSIONED SITE PLAN. NOTE: |
| | IT APPEARS THAT THE DEPTH OF THE EV CHARGING UNIT AND |
| | SIGN IS LESS THAN THE DEPTH OF THE EXTERIOR COLUMN, SO |
| | THE FACE OF THE UNIT AND THE SIGN COULD BE MOVED |
| | BETWEEN THE COLUMNS AND STILL MEET THE MINIMUM DEPTH |
| | ACROSS THE PARKING GARAGE. |
| | |
| | 3) SHOW THE FULL ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE ACCESS AISLE |
| | TO THE EXIT FROM THE GARAGE. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ROUTE |
| | IS NOT PERMITTED TO DIRECT THE ADA USER BEHIND A PARKED |
| | VEHICLE THAT IS NOT THEIR OWN. |
| | |
| | 655 HIBISCUS - FAILED |
| | |
| | 1) THE COMMENTS LISTED BELOW MUST BE CORRECTED NOT ON |
| | THE BUILDING PERMIT, BUT ALSO AS PART OF THE MINOR |
| | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT THAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED |
| | TO THE PLANNING DIVISION. |
| | |
| | 2) THE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE |
| | DIMENSION SITE PLAN AND THE SURVEY. THE SURVEY SHOWS A |
| | TOTAL OF 60 FEET BETWEEN THE EXTERIOR PARKING GARAGE |
| | WALL COLUMNS AND THE INTERIOR GARAGE COLUMNS. THE |
| | 60-FOOT WIDTH IS THE MINIMUM NECESSARY TO PROVIDE TWO |
| | 18-FOOT DEEP PARKING STALLS AND THE 24-FOOT WIDE DRIVE |
| | AISLE MEETING CODE REQUIREMENTS. THE DIMENSION SITE |
| | PLAN SHOWS THE NBDC200 DISPENSER POST INSIDE OF THE |
| | EXTERIOR WALL, RESULTING IN THERE BEING EITHER |
| | INSUFFICIENT DEPTH OF THE EV SPACES OR A REDUCTION IN |
| | THE REQUIRED DRIVE AISLE WIDTH. PROVIDE A FULL |
| | DIMENSIONED CROSS SECTION FROM THE EXTERIOR TO THE |
| | CENTER OF THE GARAGE SHOWING ACCURATE DIMENSIONS FOR |
| | THE SPACES ON BOTH SIDES OF THE DRIVE AISLE AND THE |
| | DRIVE AISLE THAT MEET CODE. PROVIDE A DIMENSIONED |
| | DRAWING OF THE NBDC200 DISPENSER POST THAT INCLUDES THE |
| | DEPTH OF THE UNIT IN PLAN AND ELEVATION. THE NBDC200 |
| | DISPENSER POST LOCATION SHALL BE ACCURATELY SHOWN ON |
| | THE DIMENSIONED SITE PLAN. NOTE: IT APPEARS THAT THERE |
| | IS NOT SUFFICIENT DEPTH FOR THIS TO BE MOVED BETWEEN |
| | THE COLUMNS AND STILL MEET THE MINIMUM DEPTH ACROSS THE |
| | PARKING GARAGE. |
| | |
| | 3) THE PROPOSED EV LAYOUT DOES NOT MATCH THE |
| | PERMITS/PLANS SUBMITTED BY RELATED FOR THE CHANGES THAT |
| | THEY PLAN TO DO TO THE GARAGE. THERE ARE DIRECT |
| | CONFLICTS BETWEEN WHAT RELATED HAS SUBMITTED (EX. NB180 |
| | DISPENSER POST). ALL PLANS MUST SHOW CONSISTENT, CODE |
| | COMPLIANT CONDITIONS. |
| | |
| | 4) SHOW THE FULL ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE ACCESS AISLE |
| | TO THE EXIT FROM THE GARAGE. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ROUTE |
| | IS NOT PERMITTED TO DIRECT THE ADA USER BEHIND A PARKED |
| | VEHICLE THAT IS NOT THEIR OWN. **** THE EV CHARGING |
| | UNIT IS SHOWN AT THE END OF THE ADA ACCESS AISLE |
| | BETWEEN IT AND THE SIDEWALK. |
| | |
| | 5) THE PROPOSED TRANSFORMER IS PROPOSED TO BE PLACED |
| | WITHIN THE EXISTING, REQUIRED LOADING ZONE. THE LOADING |
| | ZONE IS REQUIRED TO BE 50 FEET IN LENGTH. THE NEW |
| | PROPOSED CURB WOULD REDUCE THIS AREA TO LESS THAN 50 |
| | FEET IN LENGTH. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF HAS REVIEWED A |
| | PERMIT TO EXPAND THE MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE TO THE SOUTH |
| | OF THE LOADING AREA, WHICH ON ITS OWN REDUCES THE |
| | LOADING AREA TO LESS THAN 50 FEET IN LENGTH. SINCE THE |
| | OTHER PERMIT TO MODIFY THE LOADING AREA WAS SUBMITTED |
| | PRIOR TO THIS PERMIT, THE OTHER APPLICANT HAS THE FIRST |
| | OPPORTUNITY TO RESOLVE THEIR PERMIT COMMENT AS IT |
| | RELATES TO THE LOADING ZONE. IF THEY WITHDRAW/MODIFY |
| | THEIR PERMIT TO NO LONGER AFFECT THE LOADING ZONE, THEN |
| | THIS PERMIT MAY INCLUDE THE REDUCTION OF THE LOADING |
| | AREA SO LONG AS IT IS STILL AT LEAST 50 FEET IN LENGTH. |
| | |
| | 530 HIBISCUS PERMIT - 9 REGULAR SPACES BECOME - 7 EV, 1 |
| | ADA EV |
| | 620 HIBISCUS PERMIT - 8 REGULAR SPACES BECOME - 5 EV, 1 |
| | ADA EV |
| | 655 HIBISCUS PERMIT - 11 REGULAR SPACES BECOME - 9 EV, |
| | 1 ADA EV |
| | |
| |
Print |
