| Date |
Text |
| 2022-08-12 10:58:52 | 1. COMMENT: NEED PREDETERMINATION FROM FDOT FOR THE |
| | RECONFIGURATION OF ACCESS AND MEDIAN ON THE ENTRANCE |
| | ALONG QUADRILLE BLVD. |
| | RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO TRAFFIC RESPONSES AND SEE |
| | ATTACHED DOCUMENT: FDOT LETTER 93020100 MP 0.8 SR 5_ONE |
| | WEST PALM.PDF |
| | [SATISFIED] LETTER PROVIDED |
| | |
| | 2. COMMENT: PROPOSED HOTEL CANOPY EXCEEDS PROJECTION |
| | STANDARDS. PER. TABLE IV-5 MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL |
| | PROJECTION FOR CANOPY IS 20'. ADDITIONALLY, PROPOSED |
| | CANOPY SPANS NEARLY 28' WITHOUT VERTICAL SUPPORTS? |
| | RESPONSE: CANOPY WILL REMAIN AS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. |
| | REFER TO UPDATED A1.01 , A1.02 A2.20 AND R0.03 |
| | [SATISFIED] CANOPY SAME AS APPROVED |
| | |
| | 3. COMMENT: PROPOSED CHANGES TO DAYCARE ACTIVE SPACE |
| | AND OFFICE LOBBY NOW DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM ACTIVE USE |
| | REQUIREMENTS ON GROUND AND 2ND FLOOR AND ABOVE. ACTIVE |
| | USES ARE MEASURED AND CALCULATED DIFFERENTLY THAN |
| | ORIGINAL APPROVAL AND VARIANCE SHOWED. FRONTAGE VARIES |
| | ACROSS PLANS & APPROVALS: 284', 267', AND 245'. |
| | A. GROUND FLOOR: ORIGINAL APPROVAL AND DAC 15-13 HAS |
| | QUADRILLE BOULEVARD (AVENUE STREET CLASSIFICATION) AT |
| | 284? OF FRONTAGE. WITH THE 60% ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT, |
| | THIS WAS 170? OF ACTIVE USE. PROPOSED ACTIVE USE SAYS |
| | 153?-2? OR 54%. |
| | B. 2ND FLOOR: ORIGINAL APPROVAL, AND THE VARIANCE |
| | REQUESTED WITHIN DAC 15-13 HAD 2ND FLOOR FRONTAGE AT |
| | 284' AND ACTIVE USE PROVIDED AT 134' (47%). THE |
| | VARIANCE REQUEST GRANTED WAS FOR ONLY PROVIDING 47%. |
| | PROPOSED ACTIVE USE NOW AT 116' (ONLY PROVIDING 41%). |
| | C. CHANGE IN VARIANCE AMOUNT WOULD REQUIRE NEW VARIANCE |
| | REQUEST AND DAC APPROVAL. |
| | RESPONSE: REFER TO APPROVED PLAN A0.09 DATED 10/22/20 |
| | WITH 245 FEET OF FRONTAGE AT QUADRILLE BLVD. REFER TO |
| | REVISED A0.09 WITH ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS ALONG N |
| | QUADRILLE BLVD. NO CHANGES WERE DONE TO THE 2ND FLOOR |
| | ACTIVE USE. ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENTS MET; NO VARIANCE |
| | NECESSARY. |
| | [SATISFIED] GROUND LEVEL ACTIVE USE MEETS REQUIREMENT. |
| | |
| | 4. COMMENT: PROPOSED HOTEL DROP-OFF NOT IN COMPLIANCE. |
| | PER SEC. 94-111 (N.)(3.) DESIGNATED PASSENGER LOADING |
| | AND DROP-OFF AREAS SHALL BE SET BACK A MINIMUM OF 16 |
| | FEET FROM THE BACK OF CURB, SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE |
| | SIDEWALK BY A 5-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AND SHALL BE |
| | SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER. |
| | DROP-OFF IS ONLY 12 FEET FROM BACK OF CURB AND REQUIRES |
| | 5-FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER. |
| | A. PORTE COCHERES ARE SUBJECT TO MINIMUM STANDARDS |
| | DEPENDING ON SUBDISTRICT LOCATION AND ADJACENCY TO A |
| | STREET DESIGNATION AND ARE SEPARATED INTO TWO TYPES |
| | WHICH ARE ILLUSTRATED IN FIGURE IV-22. TYPE A AND TYPE |
| | "B" PORTE COCHERES SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR CLASS A OFFICE |
| | BUILDINGS AND HOTELS ONLY. |
| | B. APPROVED DROP-OFF WAS FOR 2 LANES, WIDENING THE |
| | DROP-OFF FOR A 3RD LANE IS EXCESSIVE, AS WELL AS A |
| | WIDER CURB CUT AND INGRESS/EGRESS WIDTH THAN PREVIOUSLY |
| | APPROVED. NOT CONDUCIVE TO A PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY |
| | ENVIRONMENT AND ACTIVE STREET FRONTAGE. PER FIGURE |
| | IV-22 TYPE A & B PORTE COCHERES ARE LIMITED TO A 25' |
| | WIDTH IN DRIVE LANES AND INGRESS/EGRESS. ADDITIONALLY, |
| | REQUIRES A 10' SIDEWALK AROUND THE DROP-OFF. PER SEC. |
| | 94-111(O.)(3.) CURB CUTS, PARKING ENTRANCES, EXITS, AND |
| | DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOT BE WIDER THAN 25 FEET AS MEASURED |
| | PARALLEL TO THE STREET AT THE CURB. |
| | C. WHY THE REMOVAL OF THE CURB AND BOLLARDS ON WESTERN |
| | PORTION OF HOTEL DROP-OFF? WILL NOT SUPPORT THIS OPEN |
| | SPACE BEING UTILIZED FOR STAGING OR PARKING OF CARS, |
| | DROP-OFF NOW ENCROACHES INTO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PUBLIC |
| | OPEN SPACE. RECOMMEND REPLACING CURB AND BOLLARDS TO |
| | PROTECT PEDESTRIANS IN OPEN SPACE AND NARROW DROP-OFF. |
| | D. PORTE COCHERES SHALL GENERALLY OCCUR AT THE SAME |
| | ELEVATION AS THE ADJACENT STREET AND ARE LIMITED TO ONE |
| | OCCURRENCE PER BUILDING FRONTAGE. |
| | E. CONCERNED WITH ELEVATION AND GRADE CHANGE ON |
| | SIDEWALK BETWEEN THE HOTEL FRONTAGE/DROP-OFF AREA TO |
| | 4TH ST. |
| | RESPONSE: PORTE COCHERE WAS REVISED TO COMPLY WITH |
| | REQUIREMENTS ON IV-22 TYPE B, REFER TO REVISED GROUND |
| | LEVEL PLAN, CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE. THIS WAS THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CONDITION. IT HAS THE CURB ALONG |
| | THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER |
| | AND SIDEWALK WIDTHS. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR GRADE |
| | ELEVATIONS. |
| | [SATISFIED] PORTE COCHERE REFLECTS THE APPROVED PLANS |
| | AND WITHIN IV-22 TYPE B REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 5. COMMENT: PER DAC 15-13 FINAL ORDER - CONDITIONS |
| | A. CONDITION (B.) TRAFFIC MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS |
| | STATES MINIMUM DRIVEWAY LENGTH OF 70 FT. FROM QUADRILLE |
| | BLVD. AS MEASURED FROM THE ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE |
| | TO THE FIRST CONFLICT POINT. |
| | B. PROPOSED CHANGE IN DRIVEWAY DOES NOT APPEAR TO |
| | PROVIDE 70 FT. IN LENGTH BEFORE FIRST CONFLICT POINT |
| | C. CONDITION (G.) FINAL LANDSCAPE, HARDSCAPE, AND |
| | IRRIGATION PLANS SHALL BE PRESENTED TO THE DAC FOR |
| | REVIEW PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR BUILDING PERMIT. |
| | D. PROPOSED CHANGES TO OPEN SPACE, LANDSCAPING, |
| | STREETSCAPE, LANDSCAPED QUADRILLE MEDIAN, ETC. WILL |
| | REQUIRE THE FINAL LANDSCAPING PLANS TO GO FORWARD TO |
| | DAC FOR REVIEW. |
| | E. PLEASE REFERENCE FINAL DAC ORDER 15-13 FOR |
| | ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS THAT ARE APPLICABLE. |
| | RESPONSE: REFER TO UPDATED A1.01 AND CIVIL DRAWINGS. |
| | THE DESIGN WAS RETRACTED TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED |
| | CONDITION. |
| | [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] FDOT LETTER CHANGED DRIVEWAY |
| | LENGTH CONDITIONS TO 50FT. |
| | FINAL OPEN SPACE, LANDSCAPE, HARDSCAPE, AND IRRIGATION |
| | PLANS SHALL BE PRESENTED TO DAC PRIOR TO BUILDING |
| | PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 6. COMMENT: PER FSPR 15-06 SITE PLAN APPROVAL LETTER |
| | A. CONDITION (11): THE SOUTH SIDE OF 4TH STREET AT |
| | QUADRILLE BOULEVARD SHALL BE RECONSTRUCTED TO CREATE A |
| | BULB-OUT TO PROTECT THE ON-STREET PARKING SPACES AND |
| | NARROW PEDESTRIAN CROSSING. |
| | B. PLEASE INCLUDE/SHOW THIS ADDITION ON THE PROPOSED |
| | SITE PLANS. |
| | C. CONDITION (16): PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS FOR |
| | THE LANDSCAPE OR HARDSCAPE ON SITE, THE APPLICANT SHALL |
| | PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE LIVING WALL INCLUDING PLANTING |
| | DETAIL AND PLANT SPECIES. |
| | D. PLEASE REFERENCE FSPR 15-06 SITE PLAN APPROVAL |
| | LETTER FOR ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS THAT ARE APPLICABLE. |
| | UPON REVIEW OF PPRC COMMENTS, MAY WANT TO SCHEDULE A |
| | SEPARATE MEETING TO FURTHER REVIEW/DISCUSS PROPOSED |
| | CHANGES IN REGARDS TO ZONING REQUIREMENTS. |
| | RESPONSE: REFER TO UPDATED A1.01, LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL |
| | DRAWINGS WITH BULB-OUT INCLUDED. THE LIVING WALL IS |
| | STILL BEING PROVIDED; NO CHANGES SUBMITTED FOR THE |
| | LIVING WALL. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: 8/12/22 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE PROOF THAT ALL FDOT CONDITIONS FOR THE |
| | ENTRY ON QUADRILLE ARE MET. (DIMENSIONS, LANE MARKINGS, |
| | ETC.) |
| | |
| | - PER OUR PREVIOUS CONVERSATIONS AND EMAIL |
| | CORRESPONDENCE; PLEASE IDENTIFY AND LABEL THE TWO NEW |
| | ENCLOSED ROOMS (ON SHEET A1.01) NEXT TO THE LARGE |
| | 60-SPACE BIKE STORAGE ADJACENT TO THE GARAGE RAMP AND |
| | ENTRY LOOP ON THE QUADRILLE SIDE. IF THESE ARE NOT |
| | MECHANICAL, PLEASE REFLECT ON FAR CALCULATIONS AND |
| | GROSS BUILDING AREA, (SHEET A0.07 - DIAGRAM -FAR) |
| | |
| | - LANDSCAPE PLANS AND CIVIL PLANS STILL SHOW INCORRECT |
| | SITE CONDITIONS, SPECIFICALLY WITH HOTEL/OFFICE DROP |
| | OFF, PLEASE COORDINATE PLANS TO MATCH THE ARCHITECTURE |
| | SET AND GROUND LEVEL SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | - [REPEAT COMMENT] CONDITION - FINAL OPEN SPACE, |
| | LANDSCAPE, HARDSCAPE, AND IRRIGATION PLANS SHALL BE |
| | PRESENTED TO DAC PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT. |
| | |
| | CHRIS KIMMERLY, AICP |
| | URBAN DESIGN PLANNER |
| | 822.1426 [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
