| Date |
Text |
| 2022-09-20 10:06:49 | COULD NOT FIND RESPONSE LETTER IN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR |
| | THE FOLLOWING PRIOR REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | -RESPONSE LETTER HAD NO RESPONSE TO NUMBER 33 AND |
| | NUMBER 34. PLEASE INCLUDE IN NEXT REPONSE LETTER. |
| | -PLEASE ADD VISUAL MEASUREMENT SCALE TO ENLARGEMENTS ON |
| | SHEET C300. |
| | -MAY NOT BE ABLE TO TEE PROPOSED 1 INCH METER DEPENDING |
| | ON CHARACTERISTICS OF EXISTING METERED WATER SERVICE. |
| | WILL DETERMINE IF NEW TAP IS NEEDED AT ENGINEERING |
| | DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL. |
| | -PGD PLAN SHOWS LIGHT POLE AND BOLLARDS ENCROACHING IN |
| | PROPOSED SIDEWALK NEAR SOUTHWEST AREA OF PROPERTY. |
| | -FIRELINE AND HYDRANT DESIGN NEEDS TO BE REFINED. IF |
| | FIRE HYDRANT IS INTENDED TO BE PRIVATE, THEN IT NEEDS |
| | TO BE DOWNSTREAM OF DCDA. IF PROPOSED TO BE CITY |
| | HYDRANT, THEN NEEDS TO BE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE WITH |
| | PIPE DISTANCE REDUCED IN A UTILITY EASEMENT. ALSO MAKE |
| | SURE FIRE HYDRANT WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY TREES IN |
| | LANDSCAPING ISLAND. ALTERNATELY COULD TRY TO EXTEND FDC |
| | CLOSER TO EXISTING HYDRANT. |
| | -PIPING BETWEEN TAP AND DCDA NEEDS TO BE DIP. |
| | -SMALL WATER SERVICES SHOULD BE K COPPER OR POLY. |
| | -PROPOSED 1 INCH METER WOULD REQUIRE RP BACKFLOW |
| | ASSEMBLY. IT WOULD ALSO REQUIRE UTILITY EASEMENT. |
| | PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL THEM ON UTILITY PLAN. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING: |
| | -MAY HAVE TO CUT BACK EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO WATER |
| | MAIN. WILL DETERMINE AT ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT |
| | SUBMITTAL. |
| | -PROPOSED WATER SERVICES NEED TO BE FURTHER REVIEWED AT |
| | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL AND MAY REQUIRE |
| | DESIGN REVISIONS. |
| | -LANDSCAPING PLAN L100 SEEMS TO SHOW TREE AND BUSH |
| | CONFLICTS WITH WATER SERVICES. PLEASE ENSURE TREES AND |
| | BUSHES ARE APPROPRIATELY SPACED FROM UTILITIES. |
| | |
| | RESPECTFULLY, |
| | MARK HURLEY [email protected] |
| |
Print |
