| Date |
Text |
| 2022-05-12 11:27:02 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 05.12.2022 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z22040026 |
| | CASE NO.: PB 1608C |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 2. LETTERS FROM ALL UTILITY COMPANIES SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS DO NOT |
| | ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE PREVENT |
| | THEIR ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES. |
| | |
| | 3. JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT NEEDS TO INCLUDE RESPONSES |
| | TO ALL OF THE REQUIRED ?STANDARDS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE? |
| | AS OUTLINED IN THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS AT THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE, WHICH SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.0 FOOTCANDLES. |
| | IT APPEARS THAT THERE MAY BE A COUPLE AREAS ALONG |
| | CONGRESS AVENUE WHERE THIS LEVEL MAY BE EXCEEDED AND |
| | WILL NEED TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 5. THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO BETTER DELINEATE WHICH |
| | PARKING SPACES ARE ?STORAGE? AND WHICH SPACES ARE PART |
| | OF THE REQUIRED PARKING. |
| | |
| | 6. THE LOT COVERAGE AND OPEN SPACE PERCENTAGES SHOULD |
| | TOTAL 100%; AS PROVIDED ON THE SITE PLAN THE TOTAL |
| | EQUALS 103.9%. ENSURE ALL CALCULATIONS ARE ACCURATE AND |
| | CONSISTENT. |
| | |
| | 7. IN THOSE AREAS WHERE WHEEL STOPS ARE NOT BEING USED |
| | AND VEHICLES ARE OVERHANGING INTO LANDSCAPING, ETC., |
| | THE OVERHANG SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN AND |
| | DIMENSIONED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS CONFIGURATION |
| | (ABSENCE OF WHEEL STOPS AND UTILIZATION OF CURBING) IS |
| | ENCOURAGED AS IT INCREASES THE AMOUNT OF PERVIOUS AREA |
| | AND REDUCES MAINTENANCE. IT APPEARS THAT THERE ARE |
| | ADDITIONAL AREAS WHERE THIS CONFIGURATION CAN BE |
| | IMPLEMENTED. |
| | |
| | 8. THE VEHICLE DISPLAY AREAS SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE |
| | OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER, AND SHALL NOT BE |
| | WITHIN THE SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE FOR THE INGRESS/EGRESS. |
| | |
| | 9. DIRECTIONAL SIGNS SHALL NOT CONTAIN THE NAME/LOGO OF |
| | THE BUSINESS. DOING SO WOULD QUALIFY THEM AS ADDITIONAL |
| | MONUMENT SIGNS, THEREBY EXCEEDING THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF |
| | MONUMENT SIGNS PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | 10. PLEASE CLARIFY THE MONUMENT SIGN PLANS; MULTIPLE |
| | SIGNS ARE SHOWN BUT THEN THERE IS ONE THAT IS OUTLINED |
| | IN RED. ONLY PROVIDE INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE |
| | SIGNS THAT ARE ACTUALLY BEING PROPOSED. |
| | |
| | 11. THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE |
| | LOCATION OF ALL FREESTANDING SIGNS, SETBACKS FROM |
| | ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES, ETC. THE LABEL OF THE SIGN |
| | SHOULD CLEARLY IDENTIFY AND CORRESPOND TO THE SIGNS |
| | SHOWN ON THE SIGN PLANS. |
| | |
| | 12. MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE SAFE |
| | SIGHT TRIANGLE FOR THE INGRESS/EGRESS. |
| | |
| | 13. PARKING DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED AND CONFORM TO THE |
| | CITY?S MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS (CONTACT ME FOR A COPY). |
| | |
| | 14. DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE BIKE PARKING (PAD, |
| | RACK, ETC.). |
| | |
| | 15. THE PLACEMENT OF THE BIKE RACK DOES NOT APPEAR TO |
| | PROVIDE SUFFICIENT CLEARANCE. PLEASE CONTACT ME TO |
| | OBTAIN THE DETAIL SHOWING THE REQUIRED CLEARANCE AROUND |
| | THE RACK. |
| | |
| | 16. BIKE RACKS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ACCOMMODATE 7 |
| | BICYCLE SPACES (1 PER 20 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED); ONLY |
| | 4 ARE INDICATED IN THE DATA TABLE. |
| | |
| | 17. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION AND OPERATIONS OF |
| | UNLOADING VEHICLES UPON DELIVERY. |
| | |
| | 18. THE PARKING CALCULATIONS APPEAR TO BE INCORRECT AND |
| | DO NOT ACCOUNT FOR ALL OF THE ENCLOSED AREA, OUTDOOR |
| | STORAGE, ETC. |
| | |
| | 19. THERE ARE A NUMBER OF LOCATIONS WHERE |
| | EXISTING/PROPOSED LIGHT POLES HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO |
| | CONFLICT WITH DRIVE AISLES, PARKING SPACES, ETC. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE A DETAIL TO SHOW HOW THESE POLES ARE BEING |
| | INSTALLED IN RELATION TO THE ADJACENT DRIVE AISLES AND |
| | PARKING SPACES. |
| | |
| | 20. THE PARKING SPACE IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF BUILDING #2 |
| | ARE TOO SHORT TO ACCOMMODATE TANDEM PARKING OF TWO (2) |
| | VEHICLES. |
| | |
| | 21. PLEASE PROVIDE EXISTING, DEMO, AND PROPOSED FLOOR |
| | PLANS FOR THE EXISTING BUILDINGS THAT ARE PROPOSED TO |
| | BE REMODELED OR EXPANDED. IT APPEARS THAT THE OPEN-AIR |
| | SERVICE CARPORT ALONG CONGRESS AVENUE IS BEING |
| | ENCLOSED, ADDITIONAL OFFICE SPACE FOR SERVICE WRITERS, |
| | ETC. IS THIS ENCLOSED CARPORT BEING ACCOUNTED FOR IN |
| | THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS? |
| | |
| | 22. THE SITE DATA TABLE DOESN?T ACCOUNT FOR ALL OF THE |
| | SERVICE BAYS THAT ARE BEING SHOWN. BUILDING 1 IS TO |
| | HAVE 29 BAYS (NOT 28), AND BUILDING 4 HAS 3 BAYS. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, HOW MANY BAYS EXIST IN BUILDING #3? |
| | |
| | 23. THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES INDICATED IN THE SITE |
| | DATA TABLE DOES NOT CORRESPOND WITH WHAT IS SHOWN ON |
| | THE SITE PLAN AND ARE NOT TOTALED CORRECTLY. |
| | |
| | 24. THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATIONS IN |
| | THE SITE DATA TABLE ARE INCORRECT. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF ALL REVISED PLANS AND/OR |
| | DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE JULY 19, 2022, |
| | PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE |
| | SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED |
| | DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, MAY 27, 2022. |
| | |
| | G) TO BE PLACED ON THE JULY 19, 2022, PLANNING BOARD |
| | AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER |
| | THAN JULY 4, 2022. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND BE |
| | INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S |
| | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH |
| | REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE. |
| | |
| | H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT |
| | DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE |
| | COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | TTY: 800.955.8771 |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
