| Date |
Text |
| 2023-07-10 16:43:02 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. SATISFIED - THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO INCREASE |
| | THE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM |
| | 0.75 TO 1.5 F.A.R. HAS THERE BEEN ANY PUBLIC OUTREACH |
| | WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD? IT IS ADVISED THAT THE |
| | APPLICANT REACH OUT TO THE NEIGHBORING |
| | PROPERTIES/NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION(S) FOR PUBLIC INPUT |
| | ON THE PROPOSAL. |
| | |
| | 1.1. PER THE 06.13.2023 RESPONSE LETTER TO PPRC'S |
| | COMMENTS, THE APPLICANT HAS MADE SIGNIFICANT OUTREACH |
| | EFFORTS TO KEEP EVERYONE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMED |
| | ABOUT THE PLAN WITH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 2. SATISFIED - UPDATED SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY IS |
| | REQUIRED. SURVEY PROVIDED IS NOT SIGNED AND SEALED AND |
| | IT IS OVER 2 YEARS OLD. THE PROVIDED SURVEY IS NOT |
| | ACCEPTABLE. PLEASE REFER TO PAGE 5 OF THE 2022 |
| | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ON |
| | THE SURVEY. |
| | |
| | 3. SATISFIED - WHAT IS THE PURPOSE FOR THE PROPOSED |
| | FUTURE LAND USE (FLU) MAP AMENDMENT FROM COMMERCIAL (C) |
| | TO COMMERCIAL EAST (CE)? IS THERE A CONCEPTUAL PLAN |
| | AND/OR MASSING STUDY FOR THE SITE? DOES THE |
| | CONCEPTUAL/MASSING PLAN FIT WITH THE PROPOSED FLU |
| | CHANGE TO CE AND THE CONTEXT OF THE SURROUNDING AREA? |
| | CAN THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS)? |
| | ASIDE FROM THE CONTEXT OF THE SURROUNDING AREA, THE |
| | APPLICANT MUST BE ABLE TO PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION AND |
| | JUSTIFY WHY THE CE FLU IS DESIRED AND APPROPRIATE FOR |
| | THE SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA (I.E. THERE HAS TO BE A |
| | PURPOSE FOR THE FLUMA). A CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN AND |
| | MASSING STUDY DEMONSTRATING THAT THE DESIGN/MAXIMUM |
| | MASSING OF THE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CAN BE |
| | ACCOMMODATED AND FITS WITH THE CHARACTER AND CONTEXT OF |
| | THE SURROUNDING AREA WITH THE PROPOSED FLUMA SHOULD BE |
| | SUBMITTED TO SUPPLEMENT THE APPLICATION. THIS IS |
| | CRITICAL INFORMATION FOR STAFF TO ANALYZE IN |
| | DETERMINING IF THE FLUMA SHOULD BE SUPPORTED. |
| | |
| | 3.1. A CONCEPTUAL MASSING PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED IN THE |
| | 06.13.2023 RESUBMITTAL PACKET ILLUSTRATING THE PROPOSED |
| | MASSING BASED ON THE CE FLU STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | 4. SATISFIED - THE SUBJECT PROPERTY APPEARS TO HAVE A |
| | SPLIT FLU DESIGNATION OF CE AND C. THROUGH DATA AND |
| | ANALYSIS, THE APPLICANT MUST BE ABLE TO IDENTIFY HOW |
| | MUCH OF THE OVERALL 1.0-ACRE SUBJECT SITE (IN |
| | ACRES/SQUARE FEET) IS PROPOSED FOR THE FLU CHANGE TO |
| | CE. ONLY THE PORTION OF THE SITE THAT IS SUBJECT TO THE |
| | FLU MAP AMENDMENT WILL BE UTILIZED TO DETERMINE THE |
| | MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL AND ANALYZED FOR |
| | LEVEL-OF- SERVICE (LOS). |
| | |
| | 5. SATSIFIED - IN THE LOS ANALYSIS, THE MAXIMUM |
| | DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STATES THAT THE ACREAGE FOR THE |
| | AMENDMENT IS 0.627 ACRES. THERE IS NO |
| | EXPLANATION/BACK-UP INFORMATION/DOCUMENTATION TO WHERE |
| | THIS NUMBER CAME FROM (I.E. IT IS NOT MENTIONED IN THE |
| | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, NO SURVEY/ANALYSIS TO SHOW WHY |
| | THE 0.627 ACRES IS USED IN THE ANALYSIS FOR THE MAXIMUM |
| | DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL, ETC.). PLEASE CLARIFY IN THE |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 6. SATISFIED - THE LOS CALCULATIONS/ANALYSIS IS BASED |
| | ON THE MOST INTENSIVE USE AND MOST INTENSIVE IMPACT |
| | (BASED ON THE MOST INTENSIVE USE) TO THE VARIOUS PUBLIC |
| | FACILITIES (I.E. IT COULD BE EITHER COMMERCIAL OR |
| | RESIDENTIAL). THE LOS ANALYSIS SHALL BE REVISED TO: A) |
| | CALCULATIONS MUST BE BASED ON THE MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT |
| | POTENTIAL FOR ONLY THE AREA SUBJECT TO THE FLUMA. CHECK |
| | THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE MAXIMUM |
| | DENSITY/INTENSITY FOR THE CE FLU (32.27 DU/ACRE OR 1.5 |
| | FAR). B) DATA AND LOS CALCULATIONS FOR EACH PUBLIC |
| | FACILITY MUST BE BASED ON THE MOST INTENSIVE USE/IMPACT |
| | GENERATED. C) FOR SANITARY SEWER: WHERE DID THE 0.20 |
| | GPD STANDARD COME FROM? CONTACT THE ENGINEERING |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR RATE THAT SHOULD BE USED. D) |
| | FOR POTABLE WATER: WHERE DID THE 0.24 GPD STANDARD COME |
| | FROM? CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR A |
| | RATE THAT SHOULD BE USED. E) FIGURE 1 PROVIDED IN THE |
| | LOS ANALYSIS DEPICTS THE WRONG PARCEL (I.E. IT IS NOT |
| | THE PARCEL LOCATED AT 319 BELVEDERE ROAD). PLEASE |
| | ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. F) WHERE DID THE INFORMATION |
| | FROM ATTACHMENTS 1 AND 2 COME FROM? THE ANALYSIS DOES |
| | NOT REFERENCE WHERE THIS INFORMATION CAME FROM. G) THE |
| | LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE AND SUMMARIES WILL NEED TO |
| | BE REVISED BASED ON THE CORRECTED INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - THE PROPOSED FLU CHANGE IS |
| | EXPECTED TO INCREASE THE DEMAND ON PUBLIC FACILITIES. |
| | ANY INCREASE IN DEMAND ON ANY OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES |
| | AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED FLU CHANGE SHALL ALSO |
| | PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION FROM THE APPLICABLE |
| | SERVICE AGENCY INDICATING THAT SUFFICIENT |
| | CAPACITY/RESERVE CAPACITY EXISTS TO ACCOMMODATE THE |
| | BUILD-OUT OF THE PROPOSED FLU DESIGNATION. |
| | CERTIFICATION LETTERS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | FOLLOWING: DRAINAGE, WATER, WASTEWATER (SEWER) SOLID |
| | WASTE, SCHOOLS AND TRAFFIC. PLEASE NOTE THAT A GENERAL |
| | STATEMENT STATING THAT THE CITY HAS SUFFICIENT CAPACITY |
| | AVAILABLE FOR THE FLUMA IS INSUFFICIENT (AS NOT ALL |
| | SERVICES ARE PROVIDED BY THE CITY AND CAPACITY MUST BE |
| | VERIFIED BY THE VARIOUS SERVICE PROVIDERS.). |
| | |
| | 7.1. CERTIFICATION LETTERS STILL OUTSTANING FOR: |
| | POTABLE WATER, SANITARY SEWER AND DRAINAGE. |
| | |
| | 7.2. SCAD FLUMA LETTER REFLECTS 32 RESIDENTIAL UNITS. |
| | WHERE DID THIS NUMBER COME FROM? SCAD LETTER SHOULD |
| | REFLECT MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL ONLY (20 UNITS). |
| | |
| | 8. SATISFIED - THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MUST BE |
| | CLEAR ON THE REQUEST. PLEASE REVISE THE JUSTIFICATION |
| | STATEMENT TO SPECIFY/EXPAND ON THE RELATED BACKGROUND |
| | INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT SITE; JUSTIFICATION, SPECIAL |
| | REASONS, OR BASIS FOR THE REQUEST; VISION/CONCEPTUAL |
| | PROPOSED FOR THE SUBJECT SITE AND MASSING STUDY; AMOUNT |
| | OF AREA OF THE OVERALL PARCEL SUBJECT TO THE FLUMA, |
| | ETC. |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE TWO (2) PAPER |
| | COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS/DOCUMENTS IN |
| | THE RESUBMITTAL. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) RESUBMITTAL AT NO |
| | ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE |
| | TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE |
| | ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20 PERCENT |
| | OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600.00). |
| | |
| | CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ 561.822.1458 OR [email protected] IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
