| Date |
Text |
| 2022-09-02 18:18:34 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE |
| | 8/30/2022 SUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | 1. [SATISFIED] DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, EXFILTRATION |
| | TRENCHES, ETC. ARE NOT TO CROSS THE PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | 2. [SATISFIED] THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF |
| | BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION TRENCH SYSTEMS. |
| | |
| | 3. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? SEE COMMENT #15 BELOW] |
| | VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCE (NAVD OR NGVD) NOT CONSISTENT |
| | ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS. PLEASE PROVIDE CONVERSION |
| | EQUATION BETWEEN THE VERTICAL DATUM USED ON THE PLANS |
| | (NGVD1929) TO NAVD1988. |
| | |
| | 4. [SATISFIED] REVIEW BANYAN BLVD AS-BUILT DRAWINGS (OR |
| | DESIGN DRAWINGS) FOR STORM PIPE CONNECTIVITY. SHOW |
| | CURRENT LAYOUT OF BANYAN BLVD. |
| | |
| | 5. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE FLOW ARROWS SHOWING DIRECTION OF |
| | SURFACE RUNOFF. |
| | |
| | 6. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? SEE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS |
| | BELOW] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FOR THE DRIVEWAYS (EXTEND |
| | TO HIGH POINT) AND ON-STREET PARKING AREAS SHOWING HOW |
| | PAVEMENT WITH SLOPE. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FROM EDGE OF |
| | TRAVEL LANE TO ALL CURBING, BREAK POINTS AND RIGHT OF |
| | WAY LINE. |
| | |
| | 7. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS AT EACH PROPERTY |
| | LINE FROM CENTERLINE OF ROAD TO FACE OF BUILDING. |
| | PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO SURFACE FEATURES AND BREAK POINTS |
| | IN SURFACE SLOPES. LABEL THE RIGHT OF WAY WITH THE |
| | STREET NAME. |
| | |
| | 8. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? IT?S REVIEWER?S OPINION THERE |
| | IS NOT AN EXISTING PIPE BETWEEN THE EXISTING CATCH |
| | BASINS AT THE NORTH END OF CLEARWATER] DEMO. PLANS DO |
| | NOT INDICATE WHETHER DRAINAGE SYSTEM ON CLEARWATER |
| | DEMOLITION PLAN INDICATES THE CURB INLETS ON CLEARWATER |
| | DRIVE ARE TO REMAIN BUT THE PGD PLAN CALLS FOR THEM TO |
| | BE REMOVED. EXISTING STRUCTURES SHOULD NOT REMAIN IF |
| | THE EXISTING PIPE CAN BE EXTENDED TO THE NEW |
| | STRUCTURES. |
| | |
| | 9. [SATISFIED] BUILDINGS OVER EXFILTRATION TRENCHES |
| | SHOULD HAVE SUFFICIENT VERTICAL CLEARANCE BELOW THE |
| | BUILDING FOR MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT FOR THE EXFILTRATION |
| | TRENCH AND FOR REPLACING THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH IN THE |
| | FUTURE WHEN IT NO LONGER IS FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. |
| | |
| | 10. [SATISFIED] STREETS SHALL BE PROPERLY SHOWN ON THE |
| | PLAN VIEWS. |
| | |
| | 11. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THESE |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 12. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL. |
| | |
| | 13. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAIL. |
| | |
| | 14. [SATISFIED] IT APPEARS A COLUMN IS PROPOSED OVER |
| | EXISTING STORM PIPE APPROXIMATELY 33 FEET NORTH OF |
| | MATCHLINE C-07 AND 16 FEET WEST OF THE EAST PROPERTY |
| | LINE ON SHEET C-06. |
| | |
| | 15. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? SEE COMMENTS FOR COVER, C-01 |
| | AND C-02] SHEETS COVER, C-12 AND C-13 INDICATE THE |
| | VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCE IS NAVD1988. SHEETS C-06 |
| | THROUGH C-09 INDICATE THE VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCE IS |
| | NGVD1929. SHEETS C-01 AND C-02 NEED TO LIST THE |
| | VERTTICAL DATUM REFERENCE AND CONVERSION EQUATION. THE |
| | COVER NEEDS THE CONVERSION EQUATION. |
| | |
| | 16. [SATISFIED] WATER QUALITY TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW |
| | ATTENUATION WILL BE NEEDED FOR THE ADDITIONAL |
| | IMPERVIOUS AREA IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. |
| | |
| | 17. [SATISFIED] SEPARATE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS FOR |
| | CLEARWATER DRIVE WILL BE NEEDED FOR THE ENGINEERING |
| | PERMIT SUBMITTAL. A BASELINE ON CLEARWATER DRIVE WILL |
| | NEED TO BE ESTABLISHED FOR THE ENGINEERING PERMIT |
| | SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS (8/30/22 CIVIL SUBMITTAL) |
| | |
| | 18. NUMBER THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED STRUCTURES FOR |
| | EASE OF REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | 19. AVOID LOCATING MANHOLE COVERS WITHIN SIDEWALKS. |
| | |
| | 20. LEADER ARROW FOR LABEL PROPOSED STORM MH (TYP) |
| | (SHEET C-07 NORTH OF THE MIDDLE DRIVEWAY) NEEDS |
| | ADJUSTING. |
| | |
| | 21. PROVIDE FLOW ARROW FOR ON-STREET KISS AND RIDE AREA |
| | ON SHEET C-07. ADJUST DIMENSION OF THE AREA ON SHEET |
| | C-04. |
| | |
| | 22. CONCRETE APRONS WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. |
| | |
| | 23. WHY IS SIDEWALK WIDER THAN THE CROSS WALKS ACROSS |
| | THE TWO SOUTHERN DRIVEWAYS? |
| | |
| | 24. PROVIDE VALLEY GUTTER/DROP CURB ACROSS DRIVEWAYS. |
| | |
| | 25. SECTION A-A ? PROVIDE DIMENSION FROM R/W TO THE |
| | VALLEY GUTTER OR PAVEMENT FLOW LINE. |
| | |
| | 26. SECTION B-B ? PROVIDE DIMENSION FROM R/W TO HIGH |
| | POINT OF DRIVEWAY. |
| | |
| | 27. SECTION D-D ? INCREASE THE 5% SLOPE TO REDUCE, TO |
| | THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE, THE AMOUNT OF DRIVEWAY |
| | AREA FLOWING TO THE RIGHT OF WAY. |
| | |
| | 28. SECTION E-E ? FLIP SYMBOLS ON SHEET C-06 TO POINT |
| | TO THE EAST. CONFIRM MULTI-USE PATH EXTENDS OUTSIDE THE |
| | RIGHT OF WAY. |
| | |
| | 29. SECTION F-F ? WHAT DOES THE 11.6 FT DIMENSION REFER |
| | TO? PROVIDE SOUTHBOUND PAVEMENT WIDTH. |
| | |
| | 30. JUSTIFY THE SIZE OF THE OUTFALL PIPE DIAMETER |
| | BETWEEN THE CONTROL STRUCTURE AND THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM |
| | WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. FLOW IS LIMITED TO THE 8? X 8? |
| | ORIFICE. |
| | |
| | TRACY WARD, PE |
| | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | 561-494-1120 (O) |
| | 561-351-0510 (M) |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
