| Date |
Text |
| 2022-08-03 07:58:18 | 8/3/22 ? PASSED |
| | |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING: |
| | A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED |
| | MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG |
| | WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN). |
| | C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF |
| | 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED |
| | AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED: |
| | F. PLEASE PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| | (FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, FLORIDA PUBLIC |
| | UTILITIES, AT&T TELECOMMUNICATION, COMCAST CABLE |
| | COMMUNICATIONS, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH UTILITIES) |
| | CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH |
| | INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE |
| | PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES. [SATISFIED] |
| | G. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE |
| | STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [SATISFIED] |
| | H. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS BELOW. [SATISFIED] |
| | I. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT |
| | INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED |
| | MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | PLANS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED: |
| | 1. PLEASE CORRECTLY IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE |
| | EXISTING PROPERTY LINE ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, |
| | ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED] |
| | 2. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED USE(S) FOR |
| | BOTH ?PHASE 1? AND ?PHASE 2? IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON |
| | THE SITE PLAN, SHEET # SP.1. [SATISFIED] |
| | 3. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR) SUBSECTION 94-35(C)(9), |
| | PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A CONNECTION |
| | BETWEEN THE EXISTING PUBLIC SIDEWALK AND THE PROPOSED |
| | ON-SITE PRIVATE SIDEWALK ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, |
| | ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED] |
| | 4. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A |
| | SINGLE/PEDESTRIAN GATE OR OPENING IN THE PROPOSED ?6? |
| | HT. BLACK CHAIN LINK FENCE? FOR THE SIDEWALK CONNECTION |
| | ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED] |
| | 5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION, |
| | HEIGHT, AND INTENSITY OF ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON |
| | ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED] |
| | 6. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF |
| | EXISTING AND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS (OR OPERATIONAL |
| | EQUIVALENTS) WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE PROPOSED |
| | STRUCTURE(S) ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET # SP.1. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | 7. THE APPROVED SITE PLAN |
| | IDENTIFIES/INDICATES/DEMONSTRATES A ?FPL TRANSFORMER W/ |
| | 10? X 15? EASEMENT?. THEREFORE, PLEASE |
| | IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF THE |
| | PROPOSED ?FPL TRANSFORMER W/ 10? X 15? EASEMENT? ON ALL |
| | THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [RESPONSE PROVIDED] |
| | 8. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?TOTAL SITE AREA? CALCULATION (BY |
| | PROVIDING THE AREA CALCULATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND |
| | BOTH PHASES SEPARATELY) IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON THE |
| | SITE PLAN, SHEET # SP.1. [SATISFIED] |
| | 9. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?MAX. IMPERVIOUS AREA? AND |
| | ?PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA? CALCULATIONS (BY PROVIDING |
| | THE IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE SITE |
| | AND BOTH PHASES SEPARATELY) IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON |
| | THE SITE PLAN, SHEET # SP.1. [SATISFIED] |
| | 10. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE? |
| | CALCULATION (BY PROVIDING THE BUILDING COVERAGE |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND BOTH PHASES |
| | SEPARATELY) IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, |
| | SHEET # SP.1. [SATISFIED] |
| | 11. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?PROPOSED BUILDING FAR? |
| | CALCULATION (BY PROVIDING THE FLOOR AREA RATIO |
| | CALCULATION FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND BOTH PHASES |
| | SEPARATELY) IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, |
| | SHEET # SP.1. THE PROPOSED 756 SQUARE FOOT ?COVERED |
| | PATIO? AREA SHALL NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE FLOOR AREA |
| | RATIO CALCULATION. [SATISFIED] |
| | 12. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?REQUIRED OPEN SPACE? AND |
| | ?PROPOSED OPEN SPACE? CALCULATIONS (BY PROVIDING THE |
| | OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND BOTH |
| | PHASES SEPARATELY) IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE |
| | PLAN, SHEET # SP.1. [SATISFIED] |
| | 13. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?REQUIRED PARKING? CALCULATION |
| | IN THE ?SITE DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET # |
| | SP.1. THE MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR THE PROPOSED |
| | USE OF ?RESTAURANTS SERVING A LIMITED CLIENTELE |
| | (PRIVATE CLUBS AND LODGES)? IS 1 SPACE PER 200 GROSS |
| | SQUARE FEET (THE PROPOSED GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE |
| | INDICATED IS 3,264 SQUARE FEET). [SATISFIED] |
| | 14. PLEASE CORRECT THE ?REQUIRED VEHICULAR LANDSCAPE |
| | AREA? CALCULATIONS (FROM ?209.6 SF? TO 209.7 SF AND |
| | FROM ?499.6 TOTAL SF? TO 499.7 TOTAL SF) IN THE ?SITE |
| | DATA? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET # SP.1. [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENT MUST BE ADDRESSED: |
| | 15. PLEASE ADDRESS STORMWATER REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | |
| | KEVIE DEFRANC |
| | PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-822-1449 |
| | |
| |
Print |
