Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z22030025
Project Number Z22030025
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 5
Notes
Date Text
2022-12-02 16:58:2612/2/22 - PASSED
  
  
 PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS:
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN
 RESUBMITTING:
 A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
 B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG
 WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN).
 C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
 D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED
 AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL.
  
 REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED:
 F. PLEASE PROVIDE PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS FROM THE
 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, FLORIDA PUBLIC
 UTILITIES, AND COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS CONFIRMING
 THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR
 EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
 THEIR SERVICES. [SATISFIED]
 G. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE
 STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [SATISFIED]
 H. PLEASE HAVE YOUR TRAFFIC ENGINEER PROVIDE A CAR
 STACKING (QUEUE SPILLBACK) ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE STACKING (QUEUING) OF
 CARS WILL NOT CAUSE ANY NEGATIVE IMPACTS ON PUBLIC AND
 PRIVATE WAYS AND ON ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY.
 [SATISFIED]
 I. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW
 COMMENTS BELOW. [SATISFIED]
 J. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED
 MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL.
 [SATISFIED]
  
 PLANS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED:
 1. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (EXISTING
 AND PROPOSED) EASEMENTS ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1.
 [SATISFIED]
 2. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED AUTOMATIC CAR WASH
 BUILDING SEVERAL FEET CLOSER TO THE EXISTING ALLEY ON
 ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (REQUIRED
 AND PROPOSED) SETBACK DIMENSIONS FOR THE PRINCIPAL
 STRUCTURE FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY PROPERTY LINE
 (ADJACENT TO I-95) IN THE GRAPHIC AND IN THE
 ???PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS??? TABLE ON THE
 SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED]
 4. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF
 ALL SPECIAL UTILITY AND ALL ABOVE GROUND APPURTENANCES
 ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1. [SATISFIED]
 5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF
 ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1.
 [SATISFIED]
 6. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED
 LIGHT POLES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 7. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-443(C)(5),
 PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE
 PROPOSED VEHICLE PARKING SPACES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT
 PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 8. PLEASE REALIGN THE SEGMENT OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK
 (THAT VEERS IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION ADJACENT TO ONE OF
 THE PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACES) TO PROVIDE MORE
 DEPTH FOR THE PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACE SIMILAR TO
 ALL THE OTHER PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACES ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 9. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(Q)(2)(C),
 PLEASE ROTATE THE POSITION OF THE PROPOSED BIKE RACK ON
 ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 10. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES IN THE
 ???SITE TABULAR DATA??? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET
 SP-1. IT IS ENCOURAGED TO PROPOSE A NUMBER OF BICYCLE
 PARKING SPACES GREATER THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR
 EXPECTED NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES. [SATISFIED]
 11. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(P),
 PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) LOADING SPACE(S) AND DIMENSIONS ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 12. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE (REQUIRED AND
 PROPOSED) NUMBER OF LOADING SPACE(S) IN THE ???SITE
 TABULAR DATA??? TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1.
 [SATISFIED]
 13. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE WHEEL STOPS
 WITHIN THE PROPOSED VEHICLE VACUUM SPACES ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [RESPONSE PROVIDED]
 14. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS IN THE PROPOSED ROWS OF VEHICLE
 VACUUM SPACES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [WITHDRAWN]
 15. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A WIDER
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH ENHANCED LANDSCAPE SCREENING
 ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY PROPERTY LINE ON ALL THE
 DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN]
 16. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-273(D)(46)(B)(3)(IV), PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED MONUMENT
 SIGNS AND PHASE II CANOPY MEETING THE MINIMUM DISTANCE
 REQUIREMENT OF 25 FEET FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
 LINES ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 17. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-408(D)(3)(F)(1), PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED MONUMENT
 SIGN A MEETING THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENT OF 24
 FEET FROM THE LOT LINE OF THE ADJACENT SOUTHWESTERLY
 LOT ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 18. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT
 INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED
 MONUMENT SIGNS ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [SATISFIED]
 19. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SECTION 94-406 AND
 SUBSECTION 94-273(D)(3), PLEASE REVISE THE LANGUAGE IN
 THE ???NOTES??? SECTION OF THE ???PROPOSED SIGN A & B
 DETAILS??? ON THE REGULATING PLAN, SHEET RP-1 TO STATE
 THE FOLLOWING:
 ---???MAX. HT. 30??????
 ---???MAX. 1 SQUARE FOOT FOR EACH 1 LINEAR FOOT OF
 FRONTAGE (PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD)???
 ---???MAX. 0.50 SQUARE FOOT FOR EACH 1 LINEAR FOOT OF
 FRONTAGE (I-95)???
 ---???ILLUMINATION OF THE PROPOSED SIGNS SHALL BE IN
 COMPLIANCE WITH ZLDR SECTION 94-406??? [SATISFIED]
 20. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-408(D)(1)(A),
 PLEASE ADD THE ADDRESS OF THE BUILDING TO THE PROPOSED
 WALL MOUNTED SIGN ON THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, SHEET
 A-3. [SATISFIED]
 21. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SECTION 94-409, PLEASE
 IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED BUILDING
 FA??ADE SIZE (SQUARE FOOTAGE) FOR WHERE THE PROPOSED
 WALL MOUNTED SIGN IS LOCATED AND THE (PERMITTED AND
 PROPOSED) WALL MOUNTED SIGN SIZE (SQUARE FOOTAGE) ON
 THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, SHEET A-3, AND/OR REGULATING
 PLAN, SHEET RP-1. [SATISFIED]
  
 ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS:
 22. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-485(Q)(2)(C),
 PLEASE ROTATE THE POSITION OF THE PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD
 FOR THE PROPOSED BIKE RACK ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS,
 ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED]
 23. PLEASE REVISE THE BIKE RACK DETAIL TO REFLECT THE
 PROPER ALIGNMENT FOR BOTH THE PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD AND
 BIKE RACK, INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE A MINIMUM DEPTH
 DIMENSION OF SIX (6) FEET FOR THE PROPOSED CONCRETE
 PAD, AND DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT INFORMATION FOR THE
 PROPOSED BIKE RACK MODEL TYPE ON THE REGULATING PLAN,
 SHEET RP-1. [SATISFIED]
 24. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED
 FPL EASEMENT ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY.
 [WITHDRAWN]
 25. PLEASE ADDRESS LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMENTS.
 [SATISFIED]
  
  
 KEVIE DEFRANC
 PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
 [email protected]
 561-822-1449
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved