| Date |
Text |
| 2022-05-02 19:12:40 | RICK ROSSANO, SR. PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT 561-494-1098 [email protected] |
| | NO COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH |
| | CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF |
| | BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT |
| | 561-822-2262 OR [email protected] |
| | -SURVEY NOTE 1 SAYS OFFICE HAS MADE NO SEARCH OF PUBLIC |
| | RECORDS. WILL A PUBLIC RECORDS SEARCH BE CONDUCTED? |
| | |
| | -CIVIL PLAN SHOWS FPL UTILITY EASEMENTS WHERE BUILDING |
| | STRUCTURE IS PROPOSED. ARE THOSE EASEMENTS EXISTING OR |
| | PROPOSED. IF EXISTING, HAS FPL GIVEN APPROVAL TO |
| | BUILDING THE EASEMENTS? |
| | |
| | -CIVIL SECTION B-B SAYS SOD, BUT LANDSCAPING PLANS SAYS |
| | GREEN ISLAND FICUS AND SWISS CHEESE PLANTS. PLEASE SHOW |
| | METERS AND BACKFLOWS NEAR SOUTH SIDE OF BUILDING ON |
| | PLANTING PLAN AND PROVIDE MINIMUM 18 INCHES CLEARANCE |
| | BETWEEN LANDSCAPING PLANTS AND METERS, VALVES, AND |
| | BACKFLOWS. BECAUSE SIZE OF UTILITIES HAS NOT BEEN |
| | DETERMINED ON ENGINEERING PLANS, THE FOOTPRINT MAY |
| | CHANGE AND PLANTING PLAN MAY NEED FUTURE ADJUSTMENT. |
| | |
| | -CANNOT ASSESS PROPOSED METERED IRRIGATION WATER |
| | SERVICE RELOCATION DUE TO LIMITED DETAIL PROVIDED IN |
| | CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN. MUCH MORE DETAIL NEEDS TO |
| | BE PROVIDED FOR REVIEW AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL |
| | |
| | -WHAT IS THE CLEARANCE DISTANCE BETWEEN PROPOSED |
| | BUILDING WALL ON WEST SIDE AND THE EXISTING BUILDING |
| | WALL, LIGHTS, AND CONC. WALL AT EAST SIDE OF 518 |
| | CLEMATIS? ASKING THIS FOR PRACTICAL MAINTENANCE |
| | PURPOSES AND ALSO BECAUSE ENGINEERING PLAN SHOWS LIGHTS |
| | FROM 518 CONFLICTING WITH WALL FOR 512. |
| | |
| | -ENGINEERING PLAN SHOWS EXISTING BE UNDER PROPOSED |
| | BUILDING. VERIFY THAT IS ACCEPTABLE. ALSO SEE CBL, OHW, |
| | AND TEL UTILITIES WHERE BUILDING LOCATION IS PROPOSED. |
| | IF THOSE UTILITIES ARE EXISTING, PLEASE CONFIRM THAT IS |
| | ACCEPTABLE. |
| | |
| | -WALL MOUNTING OF DCDA WOULD BE NONSTANDARD AND LIKELY |
| | NOT NEEDED IF FOLLOWING STANDARD DETAILS. CLEARANCE |
| | DISTANCE BETWEEN BACKFLOW AND WALL SHOULD TYPICALLY BE |
| | 18 INCHES. EOR NEEDS TO PROVIDE MORE DETAIL AT FORMAL |
| | ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW AND ALSO MAKE SURE |
| | STILL COMPLIES WITH FIRE MARSHAL?S PRIOR 9A REVIEW |
| | COMMENT. |
| | |
| | -SIZING OF WATER SERVICES MAY BE LIMITED DUE TO |
| | EXISTING WATER MAIN DESIGN. LARGER SIZES MAY REQUIRE |
| | UPSIZING WATER MAIN FROM QUADRILLE PLAZA DR. |
| | |
| | -THE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DOES NOT SHOW VEHICLES ENTERING |
| | OR EXISTING BUILDING. PLEASE ADD ADDITIONAL AUTOTURN |
| | ANALYSIS FOR THOSE WITH AT LEAST A SMALL MOVING TRUCK. |
| | |
| | -ENGINEERING PLAN SHOWS EXTERIOR DOORS OPENING OUTWARD |
| | WHILE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHOW RECESSED DOORS. PLEASE |
| | UPDATE ALL PLAN SETS AND MAKE SURE THEY ALL MATCH |
| | GENERAL DESIGN LAYOUT. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
