| Date |
Text |
| 2022-08-09 23:46:18 | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY. LATEST SUBMISSION |
| | DID NOT CONTAIN A TRAFFIC STUDY |
| | 2) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. LETTER WAS |
| | NOT PROVIDED IN THE LATEST RESUBMISSION |
| | 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN SHOWCASING |
| | PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, PARKING |
| | STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, DRIVEWAY) PROPERLY LABELED AND |
| | EXACT WIDTHS SHOWCASED. IF ALREADY PROVIDED, PLEASE |
| | INDICATE SPECIFIC FILE NAME AND/OR SHEET NUMBER(S). |
| | 4) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC |
| | CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE |
| | OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET |
| | NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES. |
| | 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE |
| | TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES |
| | CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A |
| | SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND |
| | SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. LATEST ANALYSIS |
| | WAS NOT PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE. BOTH VEHICLES? |
| | PATH AND MANEUVERING ARE NOT CLEAR. IF NEEDED, |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE OF AN |
| | ACCEPTABLE ANALYSIS. |
| | 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE |
| | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, |
| | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES |
| | 7) NOT SATISFIED. THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN ENVISIONS |
| | SHARED BICYCLE LANES ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE. IF NEEDED |
| | OR MISSING PROVIDE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT |
| | MARKINGS ACCORDING TO CITY STANDARDS ALONG THE BLOCK |
| | FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. INSERT REQUIRED |
| | PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGN LOCATIONS IN THE SITE PLAN. |
| | 8) NOT APPLICABLE. PROVIDE AN UPGRADED BUS STOP, |
| | INCLUSIVE OF A SHELTER. THE PROPOSED CURB CUT ON THE |
| | WEST SIDE OF TAMARIND SHALL BE CONVERTED TO A BUS |
| | PULL-OVER AREA |
| | 9) NOT SATISFIED. GIVEN THE ABANDONMENT ALONG TAMARIND |
| | AVE AND CONSIDERING THE PRESENCE OF A BUS STOP, USE |
| | PORTION OF THE AVAILABLE GREEN AREA TO EXPAND THE |
| | SIDEWALK TO 10 FEET WIDE. PLEASE ELABORATE THE RESPONSE |
| | ON THIS MATTER, AS LATEST ONE IS UNCLEAR |
| | 10) SITE PLANS DO NOT MATCH CIVIL PLANS WITH RESPECT TO |
| | THE ABANDONMENT AREA |
| | 11) IS THE BUS STOP BEING RELOCATED? |
| | 12) EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE ABANDONED AREA. ARE PARKING |
| | STALLS BEING ESTABLISHED? OR IS IT A BUS PULLOVER BAY? |
| | 13) A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET WIDE SIDEWALK SHALL BE |
| | ESTABLISHED AROUND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT FRONTAGE. |
| | PLEASE INDICATE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER |
| | SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE, PROPERLY DIMENSIONED |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
