| Date |
Text |
| 2022-08-01 15:32:14 | Z21120021 SITE G 1002 GRANT ST, 1001 STATE ST. |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE |
| | 7/19/2022 SUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | 1. [SATISFIED] REMOVE REFERENCES TO VOW (VILLAGE OF |
| | WELLINGTON?) ON COVER. |
| | |
| | 2. [SATISFIED ? AS BEST AS THEY CAN DO] PROJECT SITE ON |
| | PROJECT LOCATION MAP IS SHOWN ON THE EAST SIDE OF |
| | TAMARIND AVE. THE SITE IS ON THE WEST SIDE OF TAMARIND |
| | AVE. |
| | |
| | 3. [SATISFIED] CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN IS CONFUSING |
| | WITH EXISTING FEATURES SHOWN AND NOT SCREENED. |
| | |
| | 4. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE FLOW ARROWS SHOWING DIRECTION OF |
| | SURFACE RUNOFF. ADDITIONAL COMMENT - ADD FLOW ARROWS |
| | FOR THE AREAS AROUND THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 5. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - SEE COMMENTS UNDER NEW |
| | COMMENTS BELOW] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM: |
| | A. BUILDING TO EACH R/W CENTERLINE |
| | B. AT PROPOSED DRIVEWAY |
| | C. FROM GRANT ST CENTERLINE TO PARKING LOT |
| | D. FROM WEST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING. |
| | E. BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS |
| | |
| | LABEL STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, SURFACE FEATURES AND |
| | GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR |
| | CURBS/CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALKS AND DISTANCE FROM |
| | PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING. INCLUDE PROPOSED |
| | PARALLEL PARKING AREAS. |
| | |
| | 6. {PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING |
| | LIMITS WITHIN THE STREETS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT - THE |
| | EXISTING WATER SERVICE ON GRANT STREET MAY NEED TO BE |
| | REMOVED AND PLUGGED AT THE WATER MAIN. |
| | |
| | 7. [SATISFIED] IDENTIFY ON THE CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING |
| | PLAN WHERE THE SPECIAL TYPE 'F' CURB AND GUTTER WILL BE |
| | CONSTRUCTED. REDRAW THE DETAIL IN ACAD AND PROVIDE |
| | ENGLISH UNITS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: IF SPECIAL TYPE F |
| | CURB AND GUTTER IS NOT BEING CONSTRUCTED THEN DO NOT |
| | INCLUDE THE DETAIL FOR THE ITEM. |
| | |
| | 8. [SATISFIED] LABEL WHERE THE DRAINAGE CONTROL |
| | STRUCTURE WILL BE LOCATED AND PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE |
| | STRUCTURE. NOTE THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF |
| | BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION TRENCHES. |
| | |
| | 9. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] CONFIRM THE OUTFALL PIPE WILL |
| | NOT ENTER THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AT A CORNER OF THE |
| | STRUCTURE. ADDITIONAL COMMENT ? THE ANGLE OF THE PIPE |
| | TO THE STRUCTURE MAY REQUIRE THE HOLE OPENING (42 +/- |
| | INCHES) TO BE WIDER THAN THE INSIDE WALL DIMENSION. |
| | |
| | 10. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE HATCHING PATTERNS FOR |
| | SIDEWALKS TO REMAIN AND FOR NEW/REPLACEMENT SIDEWALKS. |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENT: ADD PATTERNS TO LEGEND. ADD |
| | DUMPSTER PAD HATCHING TO THE LEGEND. |
| | |
| | 11. [SATISFIED] PER FIGURE XV-2: GENERAL PARKING |
| | DIMENSIONS IN SECTION 94-485 OF THE CITY'S CODE OF |
| | ORDINANCES, THE CURB LENGTH OF PARALLEL PARKING SPACES |
| | IS 22 FEET. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS 25 FEET AND GAPS IN THE |
| | PARKING SPACES ON TAMARIND AVE. |
| | |
| | 12. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER ANGLING THE CURBING AT EACH |
| | END OF PROPOSED PARALLEL PARKING SPACES TO FACILITATE |
| | ACCESS TO AND FROM THE END SPACES. ADDITIONAL COMMENT - |
| | INCREASE THE ANGLE OF THE END CURBING FROM 16 DEGREES |
| | FROM PERPENDICULAR TO 45 DEGREES FROM PERPENDICULAR AT |
| | BOTH ENDS OF THE PARKING AREA ON GRANT STREET. |
| | |
| | 13. [NOT SATISFIED] THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM |
| | IS NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 |
| | AS LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE |
| | PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE NAVD1988 TO |
| | NGVD1929 CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY. |
| | |
| | 14. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] LABEL ANY NEW GUTTER OR CURB |
| | AND GUTTER IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. ADDITIONAL COMMENT - |
| | SHOW THE LINEWORK FOR THE PROPOSED VALLEY GUTTER ON |
| | GRANT ST. LABELED THE PROPOSED CURBING CREATED FOR THE |
| | ON-STREET PARKING. USE DIFFERENT LINE TYPE/WEIGHT |
| | BETWEEN EXISTING CURBING AND PROPOSED CURBING. DRAW THE |
| | VALLEY GUTTER WITH THE CORRECT WIDTH AND LOCATION. |
| | |
| | 15. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT |
| | DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN LIEU OF EXFILTRATION TRENCHES. |
| | |
| | 16. [SATISFIED] EASEMENT MAY BE NEEDED FOR THE SIDEWALK |
| | AND PARKING ON GRANT ST. |
| | |
| | 17. [NO LONGER APPLICABLE - SIDEWALK AREA NOT BEING |
| | MODIFIED FOR PARKING ON N. TAMARIND AVE] REVIEW |
| | AS-BUILT DRAWINGS FOR THE ARV TO DETERMINE IF THE |
| | STRUCTURE CAN BE MODIFIED TO LOWER THE RIM TO PROPOSED |
| | GRADE. |
| | |
| | 18. [SATISFIED] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS(3/24/22 SUBMITTAL): |
| | |
| | 19. [NOT SATISFIED ? REVISE FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT |
| | SUBMITTAL] REVISE FDOT INDEX NUMBERS TO CURRENT FDOT |
| | STANDARD PLAN NUMBERS ON THE SITE PLAN SHEETS AND |
| | ENGINEERING SHEETS. |
| | |
| | 20. [SATISFIED] SHEET SP-1 CALLS OUT A DETAIL NO. 4 ON |
| | SHEET SP-3. SHEET SP-3 DOES NOT HAVE A DETAIL NO. 4. |
| | |
| | 21. [NOT SATISFIED] REMOVE THE HATCHING FOR THE |
| | PROPOSED R/W ABANDONMENT AREA ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN |
| | SHEETS. |
| | |
| | 22. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE THE EXISTING INVERT |
| | ELEVATION OF THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE THE OUTFALL PIPE |
| | WILL CONNECT TO. |
| | |
| | 23.[NOT SATISFIED] LIST THE WEIR ELEVATION WITH THE |
| | INFORMATION FOR STRUCTURE S-102. |
| | |
| | 24. [NOT SATISFIED] CONFIRM THERE WILL BE SUFFICIENT |
| | VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE PROPOSED 15 INCH RCP |
| | OUTFALL PIPE AND 6 INCH SANITARY SEWER LATERAL. |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: SURVEY LISTS THE BOTTOM ELEVATION |
| | OF THE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE NO. 2 AS 15.16 FT NAVD. |
| | THIS BOTTOM (OR MINIMUM INVERT ELEVATION FOR THE |
| | SANITARY LATERAL) IS LESS THAN 2? LOWER THAN THE TOP OF |
| | THE PROPOSED 6? SANITARY LATERAL (AS LISTED ON THE |
| | WATER AND SEWER PLAN) WHERE THE LATERAL CROSSES THE |
| | PROPOSED 15? RCP STORM PIPE. |
| | |
| | 25. [SATISFIED] CAN S-102 AND S-101 SHIFT TO THE NORTH, |
| | AWAY FROM THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. THIS WILL REDUCE THE |
| | ANGLE OF THE OUTFALL PIPE CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING |
| | INLET. ADDITIONAL COMMENT ? STRUCTURE S-102 WILL NEED |
| | TO SHIFT NORTHWARD ABOUT 6 ? 8 MORE FEET SO THAT THE |
| | PIPE OPENING AT THE EXISTING CURB INLET WILL NOT EXCEED |
| | THE INSIDE HORIZONTAL DIMENSION OF THE WALL. |
| | |
| | 26. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW THE 2-FT LANDSCAPE OVERHANG AT |
| | THE END OF THE PARKING SPACES. ADDITIONAL COMMENT ? |
| | OVERHANG WILL BE OVER THE SIDEWALK. SHOW THE DASHED |
| | LINE ON THE SIDEWALK. |
| | |
| | 27. [SATISFIED] SHOW CONCRETE FOR THE DRIVEWAY APRON |
| | AND SIDEWALK WITHIN THE R/W. |
| | |
| | 28. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW WATER MAIN ON STATE STREET IN |
| | THE CORRECT LOCATION. SHOW THE VALVES FROM THE SURVEY. |
| | |
| | 29. SHEET C2.3 GEOMETRIC, SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN: |
| | A. [PARTIAL SATISFIED ? EXTEND DOUBLE YELLOW TO 25 LF] |
| | PROVIDE STRIPING PLAN FOR MILL AND RESURFACE AREAS. |
| | B. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? SIGNS AND STOP BARS TO BE |
| | MINIMUM 4 FEET FROM CROSS WALK] SHOW EXISTING STOP |
| | SIGNS FOR STATE STREET AND FOR GRANT STREET. |
| | C. [SATISFIED] MOVE STOP BAR AND STOP SIGN FOR PARKING |
| | LOT TO BEHIND THE SIDEWALK. |
| | D. [SATISFIED] REMOVE REFERENCE TO CITY OF RIVIERA |
| | BEACH LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FROM NOTES. |
| | E. REFERENCE THE CWPB TYPICAL 90 DEGREE PARKING STALL |
| | DETAIL. |
| | F. [SATISFIED] TYPE D CURB CALLED OUT FOR WEST EDGE OF |
| | PARKING LOT BUT THIS CURB IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PGD PLAN. |
| | G. [NOT SATISFIED] TYPE D CURB CALLED OUT ACROSS |
| | SIDEWALK ON EAST SIDE OF PROPOSED DRIVEWAY. |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (7/19/22 SUBMITTAL): |
| | H. SHARROWS SHOULD BE LOCATED AFTER THE INTERSECTION |
| | AND NOT IN THE INTERSECTION. |
| | I. CONSIDER REDUCING THE LENGTH OF THE STOP BAR IN THE |
| | PARKING LOT TO HALF THE WIDTH OF THE DRIVEWAY. |
| | J. CALLOUT FOR TYPE D CURB AT BACK OF PARALLEL PARKING |
| | SPACES ON GRANT STREET IS LOCATED ON TOP OF THE VALLEY |
| | GUTTER LINE WORK AND IS INDISCERNIBLE. |
| | |
| | 30. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? COMMENTS BELOW WERE MODIFIED |
| | FOR THE LATEST (7/19) SUBMITTAL] SECTION A (SHEET C3.2) |
| | A. VALLEY GUTTER NOT SHOWN OR LABELED FOR GRANT STREET. |
| | B. SHOW SLOPE DIRECTION FOR PARKING SPACE. |
| | C. VALLEY GUTTER FOR STATE STREET SHOWN AT CENTERLINE |
| | OF R/W. |
| | D. IS THICKENED-EDGE SIDEWALK PROPOSED FOR GRANT |
| | STREET? LABEL AS SUCH AND PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE |
| | SIDEWALK.E. DOES THE EXISTING SIDEWALK ON STATE STREET |
| | HAVE CURBING AND THICKENED-EDGE AS SHOWN ON THE CROSS |
| | SECTION? |
| | |
| | 31. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? COMMENTS BELOW WERE MODIFIED |
| | FOR THE LATEST (7/19) SUBMITTAL] SECTION B (SHEET C3.2) |
| | A. WILL NEW SIDEWALK HAVE THICKENED EDGE AT BACK OF |
| | WALK? LABEL SIDEWALK AS SUCH AND PROVIDE DETAIL. |
| | |
| | |
| | 36. [SATISFIED] SIZE OF OUTFALL PIPE SHOWN ON THE |
| | CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAIL DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS CALLED |
| | OUT ON THE PGD PLAN. JUSTIFY ANY OUTFALL PIPE DIAMETER |
| | LARGER THAN 15 INCH. |
| | |
| | 37. [SATISFIED]SHEET C4.1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN (CAN BE |
| | ADDRESSED WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL): |
| | A. PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE TO HAY BALES FOR INLET |
| | PROTECTION. |
| | B. IDENTIFY WHICH INLETS ARE TO BE PROTECTED (ONSITE |
| | AND WITHIN R/W) |
| | C. MOVE HATCHING FOR CONSTRUCTION ACCESS OUT OF THE |
| | R/W. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS (7/19/2024) |
| | 38. FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL, SHOW THE CURBING |
| | ON THE OTHER SIDE OF STATE STREET AND GRANT STREET. |
| | |
| | 39. CONFIRM SIZE OF EXISTING WATER MAIN ON STATE STREET |
| | IS 8?. |
| | |
| | 40. LABEL SIZE AND MATERIAL OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES |
| | ON STATE STREET, TAMARIND AVE AND GRANT STREET. |
| | |
| | 41. SHARROW STRIPING DETAIL TO BE PROVIDED WITH THE |
| | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. BIKE STRIPING TO BE IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH CWPB STANDARD DETAILS AND MUTCD. |
| | PROPERLY SHOW WHERE THE MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE ARE TO BE |
| | PLACED. |
| | |
| | |
| | TRACY WARD, PE |
| | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | 561-494-1120 (O) |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
